|
A Winner is Jew posted:IIRC only Kasich was beating her in the polls and that probably has more to do with him being a generic republican candidate since no one knew who the gently caress Kasich was. What's going to fuel a lot of Clinton votes is Trump hatred. Kasich wouldn't galvanize people to vote out of fear in the same way and would require Hilary to win on her own merits.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2016 22:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 14:57 |
|
Completely ignorant question here: Is it in the realm of possibility that Texas could go blue in this election?
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2016 23:05 |
|
Honestly, I think Paul Ryan is a lock for 2020 unless there is another Trump-esque mutiny. And I think he'd have good chances of winning even if Hilary is doing favorably as President. But it doesn't matter because this isn't about the Presidency. It's about the Supreme Court.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 12:48 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Ryan is clearly aiming for a 2020 run, but I wouldn't count Kaisch entirely out. I suspect that part of his distancing from Trump and refusal to bend knee all the way is to better position himself as the dissenting voice of wisdom among the failed candidates* this time around, who can point at the smoldering crater Trump leaves of the party and say "warned you, didn't I?"
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 13:52 |
|
Deteriorata posted:It's both. The pair of them completely flipped the poo poo of conservatives. They hated Hillary first because she was a liberal, ambitious, opinionated woman who clearly had the chops for national politics. Then Bill had the audacity to unseat an incumbent Republican after they had won 5 of six elections mostly by blowouts. You can say that this existed with Bush. But the 2000 election was more or less against the spirit of the electoral college (Gore didn't lose out of any sense that he wasn't fit to be President but because of a fluke with the math) and David Siegel claiming he did illegal things to secure the Florida election for Bush. And while tons of people didn't recognize Bush as a legitimate President, you didn't see much of that rhetoric come much from Kerry and Obama shied away from any calls to explore wrongdoing of the Bush administration. In the end, Bush's legitimacy as President isn't really in question and Dems have more or less decided to settle for the argument the disgusting lie that Reagan is on the level of Lincoln. Meanwhile, there are probably already meetings to try to figure out how to impeach Hilary. EDIT: Despite everything we've seen, Hilary's argument is that Donald Trump should not become President. Christie's argument is that Hilary should be in prison. Timeless Appeal has issued a correction as of 16:16 on Jul 20, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 16:13 |