Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Which would you have sex with?
Lena Dunham
Meghan Trainor
View Results
  • Locked thread
VendaGoat
Nov 1, 2005

by zen death robot


MiracleWhale posted:

which one can I sleep with to propel my fledgling Hollywood career to superstardom

Neither

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ClamdestineBoyster
Aug 15, 2015



VendaGoat posted:

Ok.

Meghan Trainor then.

She gonna make fun of you and make you feel like a piece of poo poo. At least Lena has that crushed soul, burnt out on life, heavily medicated on antidepressants and cheap wine omg my husbands a fag thing going for her.

VendaGoat
Nov 1, 2005

by zen death robot


ClamdestineBoyster posted:

She gonna make fun of you and make you feel like a piece of poo poo. At least Lena has that crushed soul, burnt out on life, heavily medicated on antidepressants and cheap wine omg my husbands a fag thing going for her.

The question was, to have sex with, I can actually achieve an erection, however limp, with Meghan.

I'm pushing half a rope.

ClamdestineBoyster
Aug 15, 2015



VendaGoat posted:

The question was, to have sex with, I can actually achieve an erection, however limp, with Meghan.

I'm pushing half a rope.

Ew.

VendaGoat
Nov 1, 2005

by zen death robot



Dude, I am putting this into the "Guy talk" category of, "death or gently caress them".

So, lena, Meghan or death?

MiracleWhale
Jun 30, 2015




VendaGoat posted:

Dude, I am putting this into the "Guy talk" category of, "death or gently caress them".

So, lena, Meghan or death?

quick death or drawn out and painful?

ClamdestineBoyster
Aug 15, 2015



VendaGoat posted:

Dude, I am putting this into the "Guy talk" category of, "death or gently caress them".

So, lena, Meghan or death?

Oh death for sure jeez, I'm not a huge gay ffs.

VendaGoat
Nov 1, 2005

by zen death robot


MiracleWhale posted:

quick death or drawn out and painful?

Drawn out and painful. I mean, look at the options here.


ClamdestineBoyster posted:

Oh death for sure jeez, I'm not a huge gay ffs.

Yah, I would pick death as well. It just wasn't on the op's list.

The Whoreax
Sep 7, 2008
I speak for the wood.

wheres goku

Kinsky
May 28, 2010

Well the word got around they said this kid is insane, man
Banged in the mouth and now he's got AIDS, man


I, too, have strong opinions about retards I only know through the token blurbs of stupid poo poo they say that gets echo chambered around the internet

Casimir Radon
Aug 1, 2008



Trainor is a bit doughy and wrote a really stupid fat acceptance anthem, but everything about Lena Dunham is terrible.

The Rage
Jun 28, 2007

I got my Magnum condoms; I got my wad of hundreds. I'm ready to plow!


Trainor

Kinsky
May 28, 2010

Well the word got around they said this kid is insane, man
Banged in the mouth and now he's got AIDS, man


I would have sex with Lena Dunham, but right before she finishes I would lean over and tell her "'For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? This is John Galt speaking. I am the man who loves his life. I am the man who does not sacrifice his love or his values. I am the man who has deprived you of victims and thus has destroyed your world, and if you wish to know why you are perishing-you who dread knowledge -I am the man who will now tell you.' The chief engineer was the only one able to move; he ran to a television set and struggled frantically with its dials. But the screen remained empty; the speaker had not chosen to be seen. Only his voice filled the airways of the country-of the world, thought the chief engineer-sounding as if he were speaking here, in this room, not to a group, but to one man; it was not the tone of addressing a meeting, but the tone of addressing a mind. 'You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man’s sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster. In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty. You have destroyed all that which you held to be evil and achieved all that which you held to be good. Why, then, do you shrink in horror from the sight of the world around you? That world is not the product of your sins, it is the product and the image of your virtues. It is your moral ideal brought into reality in its full and final perfection. You have fought for it, you have dreamed of it, and you have wished it, and I-I am the man who has granted you your wish. Your ideal had an implacable enemy, which your code of morality was designed to destroy. I have withdrawn that enemy. I have taken it out of your way and out of your reach. I have removed the source of all those evils you were sacrificing one by one. I have ended your battle. I have stopped your motor. I have deprived your world of man’s mind. Men do not live by the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those who do. The mind is impotent, you say? I have withdrawn those whose mind isn’t. There are values higher than the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those for whom there aren’t. While you were dragging to your sacrificial altars the men of justice, of independence, of reason, of wealth, of self-esteem-I beat you to it, I reached them first. I told them the nature of the game you were playing and the nature of that moral code of yours, which they had been too innocently generous to grasp. I showed them the way to live by another morality-mine. It is mine that they chose to follow. All the men who have vanished, the men you hated, yet dreaded to lose, it is I who have taken them away from you. Do not attempt to find us. We do not choose to be found. Do not cry that it is our duty to serve you. We do not recognize such duty. Do not cry that you need us. We do not consider need a claim. Do not cry that you own us. You don’t. Do not beg us to return. We are on strike, we, the men of the mind. We are on strike against self-immolation. We are on strike against the creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. We are on strike against the dogma that the pursuit of one’s happiness is evil. We are on strike against the doctrine that life is guilt. There is a difference between our strike and all those you’ve practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality-the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind. We have granted you everything you demanded of us, we who had always been the givers, but have only now understood it. We have no demands to present to you, no terms to bargain about, no compromise to reach. You have nothing to offer us. We do not need you. Are you now crying: No, this was not what you wanted? A mindless world of ruins was not your goal? You did not want us to leave you? You moral cannibals, I know that you’ve always known what it was that you wanted. But your game is up, because now we know it, too. Through centuries of scourges and disasters, brought about by your code of morality, you have cried that your code had been broken, that the scourges were punishment for breaking it, that men were too weak and too selfish to spill all the blood it required. You damned man, you damned existence, you damned this earth, but never dared to question your code. Your victims took the blame and struggled on, with your curses as reward for their martyrdom-while you went on crying that your code was noble, but human nature was not good enough to practice it. And no one rose to ask the question: Good?-by what standard? You wanted to know John Galt’s identity. I am the man who has asked that question. Yes, this is an age of moral crisis. Yes, you are bearing punishment for your evil. But it is not man who is now on trial and it is not human nature that will take the blame. It is your moral code that’s through, this time. Your moral code has reached its climax, the blind alley at the end of its course. And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality-you who have never known any-but to discover it. You have heard no concepts of morality but the mystical or the social. You have been taught that morality is a code of behavior imposed on you by whim, the whim of a supernatural power or the whim of society, to serve God’s purpose or your neighbor’s welfare, to please an authority beyond the grave or else next door-but not to serve your life or pleasure. Your pleasure, you have been taught, is to be found in immorality, your interests would best be served by evil, and any moral code must be designed not for you, but against you, not to further your life, but to drain it. For centuries, the battle of morality was fought between those who claimed that your life belongs to God and those who claimed that it belongs to your neighbors-between those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of ghosts in heaven and those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of incompetents on earth. And no one came to say that your life belongs to you and that the good is to live it. Both sides agreed that morality demands the surrender of your self-interest and of your mind, that the moral and the practical are opposites, that morality is not the province of reason, but the province of faith and force. Both sides agreed that no rational morality is possible, that there is no right or wrong in reason-that in reason there’s no reason to be moral. Whatever else they fought about, it was against man’s mind that all your moralists have stood united. It was man’s mind that all their schemes and systems were intended to despoil and destroy. Now choose to perish or to learn that the anti-mind is the anti-life. Man’s mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not. His body is given to him, its sustenance is not. His mind is given to him, its content is not. To remain alive, he must act, and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action. He cannot obtain his food without a knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it. He cannot dig a ditch-or build a cyclotron-without a knowledge of his aim and of the means to achieve it. To remain alive, he must think. But to think is an act of choice. The key to what you so recklessly call ‘human nature,’ the open secret you live with, yet dread to name, is the fact that man is a being of volitional consciousness. Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct. The function of your stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function of your mind is not. In any hour and issue of your life, you are free to think or to evade that effort. But you are not free to escape from your nature, from the fact that reason is your means of survival-so that for you, who are a human being, the question ‘to be or not to be’ is the question ‘to’ think or not to think.’ A being of volitional consciousness has no automatic course of behavior. He needs a code of values to guide his actions. ‘Value’ is that which one acts to gain and keep, ‘virtue’ is the action by which one gains and keeps it. ‘Value’ presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what? ‘Value’ presupposes a standard, a purpose and the necessity of action in the face of an alternative. Where there are no alternatives, no values are possible. There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence-and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not; it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and-self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it does; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of ‘Life’ that makes the concept of ‘Value’ possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil. A plant must feed itself in order to live; the sunlight, the water, the chemicals it needs are the values its nature has set it to pursue; its life is the standard of value directing its actions. But a plant has no choice of action; there are alternatives in the conditions it encounters, but there is no alternative in its function: it acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction. An animal is equipped for sustaining its life; its senses provide it with an automatic code of action, an automatic knowledge of what is good for it or evil. It has no power to extend its knowledge or to evade it. In conditions where its knowledge proves inadequate, it dies. But so long as it lives, it acts on its knowledge, with automatic safety and no power of choice, it is unable to ignore its own good, unable to decide to choose the evil and act as its own destroyer. Man has no automatic code of survival. His particular distinction from all other living species is the necessity to act in the face of alternatives by means of volitional choice. He has no automatic knowledge of what is good for him or evil, what values his life depends on, what course of action it requires. Are you prattling about an instinct of self-preservation? An instinct of self-preservation is precisely what man does not possess. An ‘instinct’ is an unerring and automatic form of knowledge. A desire is not an instinct. A desire to live does not give you the knowledge required for living. And even man’s desire to live is not automatic: your secret evil today is that that is the desire you do not hold. Your fear of death is not a love of life and will not give you the knowledge needed to keep it. Man must obtain his knowledge and choose his actions by a process of thinking, which nature will not force him t9 perform. Man has the power to act as his own destroyer-and that is the way he has acted through most of his history. A living entity that regarded its means of survival as evil, would not survive. A plant that struggled to mangle its roots, a bird that fought to break its wings would not remain for long in the existence they affronted. But the history of man has been a struggle to deny and to destroy his mind. Man has been called a rational being, but rationality is a matter of choice-and the alternative his nature offers him is: rational being or suicidal animal. Man has to be man-by choice; he has to hold his life as a value-by choice: he has to learn to sustain it-by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues-by choice. A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality. Whoever you are, you who are hearing me now, I am speaking to whatever living remnant is left uncorrupted within you, to the remnant of the human, to your mind, and I say: There is a morality of reason, a morality proper to man, and Man’s Life is its standard of value. All that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; all that which destroys it is the evil. Man’s life, as required by his nature, is not the life of a mindless brute, of a looting thug or a mooching mystic, but the life of a thinking being-not life by means of force or fraud, but life by means of achievement-not survival at any price, since there’s only one price that pays for man’s survival: reason. Man’s life is the standard of morality, but your own life is its purpose. If existence on earth is your goal, you must choose your actions and values by the standard of that which is proper to man-for the purpose of preserving, fulfilling and enjoying the irreplaceable value which is your life. Since life requires a specific course of action, any other course will destroy it. A being who does not hold his own life as the motive and goal of his actions, is acting on the motive and standard of death. Such a being is a metaphysical monstrosity, struggling to oppose, negate and contradict the fact of his own existence, running blindly amuck on a trail of destruction, capable of nothing but pain.'"

numberoneposter
Feb 19, 2014



Trainor for sure i could just plant my face between dem thighs.

Dunham aint got poo poo and is gross AF.

JiveHonky
May 12, 2001

by zen death robot


Grimey Drawer

Kinsky posted:

I, too, have strong opinions about retards I only know through the token blurbs of stupid poo poo they say that gets echo chambered around the internet

That's hosed up man. Your a real peice of poo poo.

Kinsky
May 28, 2010

Well the word got around they said this kid is insane, man
Banged in the mouth and now he's got AIDS, man


im actually gay just like the op haha.

chickie nugs for brekkie
May 17, 2010




Trainor. But you'll prob have to put in waaay too much effort to get that chubby pale pussy. Not worth it.

Frankenstyle
Dec 3, 2005

Mmmm, You smell like Lysol Wipes.


Eh, if I kept my eyes closed and she attacked my dick like it was a Calzone, there is a non zero chance that I might get an erection for Trainor.

numberoneposter
Feb 19, 2014



Kinsky posted:

im actually gay just like the op haha.
ok but how gay? like 3/10? or like a full 10/10 gay.

TheIllestVillain
Dec 27, 2011

Sal, Wyoming's not a country


numberoneposter posted:

Trainor for sure i could just plant my face between dem thighs.



hell yea

Berious
Nov 13, 2005


What an odd question because GBS loves themselves a slam whale

The Dennis System
Aug 4, 2014


Trainor I guess. Dunham is a horrible person.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012



College Slice

Kinsky posted:

I, too, have strong opinions about retards I only know through the token blurbs of stupid poo poo they say that gets echo chambered around the internet

Kinsky posted:

I would have sex with Lena Dunham, but right before she finishes I would lean over and tell her "'For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? ...

Wow, you're a really super-duper poster!

a turnip
Jul 22, 2015

by Shine


id sleep with anyone tbh


op what u doin this weekend

BIG-DICK-BUTT-FUCK
Jan 26, 2016

she had tiny Italian boobs.
Well that's my story.


Lol at this very question

(It's trainor)

paul_soccer10
Mar 28, 2016



thathonkey
Jul 17, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 3911 days!


Shredded Hen

what was the weird thing lena dunham did to her sister like molested her or some poo poo? the gently caress is up w that

mike12345
Jul 14, 2008

"Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I'm not sure we'll ever be able to answer that. It's one of the great mysteries."




Can I gently caress op instead?

monkeytennis
Apr 26, 2007

Mmmm ladyboys...



Would smash both as long as I didn't have to talk to them afterwards.

blowfish
Oct 10, 2012

I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!


Has anyone said Lena Rumpham yet.

Jukeboxblues
Jul 29, 2015




Grimey Drawer

I would deep fry my dick in either of their pussy batter tbh

Gobblecoque
Sep 6, 2011


Frankenstyle posted:

Eh, if I kept my eyes closed and she attacked my dick like it was a Calzone, there is a non zero chance that I might get an erection for Trainor.

dude you gotta be careful she's gonna bite yer dick off

Maldoror
Oct 5, 2003



Nap Ghost



















blowfish
Oct 10, 2012

I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!




blowfish posted:

Has anyone said Lena Rumpham yet.

thathonkey
Jul 17, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 3911 days!


Shredded Hen


i'm coming

Drive-Thru Salad Bar
May 15, 2009


2 all beef patties special sauce lettuce rape pickles onions on a sesame seed bun


I'm going

Nanpa
Apr 24, 2007



I'd prefer rumham

Nanpa
Apr 24, 2007


Third option: Danny Devito, but he has the rumham

Lawrence Gilchrist
Mar 31, 2010



I love the idea of a thread where people talk about how they wouldn't have sex with a public figure they found to be dumpy and/or a blowhard. I think it's a great trend in modern life and should continue.

If I was forced to pick between Steve Harbey and Ted Cruz I would 100% go Harbey I mean they both seem awful and are serial philanderers but at least Harbey would be less creepy about it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lawrence Gilchrist
Mar 31, 2010




Creepshots for the purpose of sexual evaluation? This is some next level poo poo

  • Locked thread