|
*starts to quiver*
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
they were Good and we want to see them Again
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 07:38
|
|
|
post the final chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 07:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
lol if u didn't save the chomes when you had the chance   i never saw cooking with smythe though 
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 08:43
|
|
|
This is a review from a person who prefer writing summaries over doing problem sets and read only one book per topic for interest. I believe most people buy this book for its face value and yes that perhaps will give it a five star (no that I care about its face value as I am not a CS major). I rated this book with one star so that the people who really want to read this book would see. And as to today's stand point, one star is relevant in sense of its priorities in learning algorithms. I throw away these books a month later trying to make it a habit reading it a little every weekday morning. I started with the from the beginning, and it would be impossible otherwise without learning the language it uses. However, the language is outdated, which is even noted by the author saying that it'd be nice if some one update it. An old language is not too bad, since many ideas in algorithms should be language independent. Nonetheless, the printout format is for punch cards. Unless, someone is nostalgic in organizing punch card in a manner that covers 1/3 of code, then all right, the book should be for you. Yes, you may do what I did by ignoring the printout over all. However, my impression after reading the delicate chapter only on punch cards is that the later codes will be heavily entangled with such format. The author does argues that perhaps learning old languages may turn out to be useful at some point. I don't like this attitude compare to "this part is tedious, skip it unless you just have too much time with you" (yes, there are authors that do say this). And there, I drop the book. There are other things that worth mentioning. When introducing the language (I don't have the book anymore and so I don't quite remember what's it's called) and its operations, some behaviors under special conditions are left out, and so you cannot completely determine the result of some operation is weird cases base on the chapter along, and they are only vaguely mentioned by the solution of the exercises. Along with some typos in the examples, it's easy to lose the overall behavior of the code. So yes, to appropriately understand this book, reading it is not sufficient; you get to play around with it on an actual computer. The chapter that I think may worth keeping it is actually the math chapter and their associated calculation for the efficiency of the algorithms. I had not seen enough theorem dealing with complicated operation with sigma sums and pi products, and I didn't go through all the calculation, but after all, the math may be the most relevant thing today as it's definitely language independent. I get to read concrete math to check if the same things show up there. So yes, in case you want it on your shelf, don't read it with too much effort, unless you are interested in updating the whole set of books.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 09:18
|
|
|
welcome to the chome of the month club
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 11:53
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:chome in the streets
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
can smythe create a chome so large even he can't cum on it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
i'm reliving the final chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
how man
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
the experience of the final chome has been bestowed unto me to relive i'm going to experience it again
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:24
|
|
|
I'm ready.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:25
|
|
|
Chome, chome, chome... Chome, chome, chome... ChooOoooOoOooooOoome...
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
hmmmmmm. chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:32
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASIYkMFHx-E
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
ChomeCore also repostin' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hABO8hRAS0
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
your chomes my chomes chomes chomes chome chome chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 14:54
|
|
|
The Final Chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:I'm ready.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Smythe posted:loving pissed that a "friend" would imply I rendered as .mov. jesus Christ loving Sever
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
"Chome it up, fuzzball" -Indie Jones
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
I also having never seen cooking with smythe and would like to thx & godbless
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
noam chomesky
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
cooking with smythe is mostly interesting for being the exact friggin' opposite of his posting (quality excepted, both own)
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 05:39
|
|
|
Dongslayer. posted:mome chomesky
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
gonna relive the final chome again
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
how would i describe the chome meme? - lomarf
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 13:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 14:51
|
|
|
Radio Paranoia posted:mome chomesky yaaaaaaaaaaaasssss
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:gonna relive the final chome again
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
Gnome
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
COACHS SPORT BAR posted:cucking with smythe
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:smythe please bring back all of your videos and chomes, including, cooking with smythe. chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
cooking with chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
GameCube posted:six and a half figgies. heh. yeah, that's- *re-reads OP* bwuuuuuuuuh?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 03:38
|
|
|
*yospos ALPHA blasts past thread at a startling 6.6 figgies, leaving a cyan & magenta wake* oh my god he went full chome
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 03:47
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:*yospos ALPHA blasts past thread at a startling 6.6 figgies, leaving a cyan & magenta wake*
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
the final chome is truly an experience unlike any other
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 04:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
oh give me a chome where the buffalo mome
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:34
|
|
