Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
surc
Aug 17, 2004

Leveling mechanics are only bad when the game is not balanced properly around them.

Also not all RPGs are designed to be min-maxed to the optimal ending, that is mainly a legacy of people being trained to play that way by poor game balancing in the past (sup, Baldurs Gate), combined with people's need to feel like they always made "The best" decisions. Isometric RPGs in particular have been pigeonholed as that style, but the presentation of a game doesn't actually require it to follow a specific gameplay mechanic, or even be designed with the same target audience as other games presented in the same way. :shrug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

surc
Aug 17, 2004


You're right, it's not fair to put that on Baldurs gate.

Sup, AD&D.

surc
Aug 17, 2004

bongwizzard posted:

imho a ruleset should not have be about keeping people from min-maxing in a single player game. If you don't want to get hit by mudcrabs for hours, just like don't do it and just play the game?

There's a difference between a ruleset "being about keeping people" from doing a thing and "not being designed around" people doing a thing. There's nothing wrong with an RPG that doesn't involve min-max mechanics. If they come up with a successful alternative, that is a cool and good and innovative thing.

  • Locked thread