|
july This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| j |
|
45 | 20.27% |
| u |
|
54 | 24.32% |
| l |
|
48 | 21.62% |
| y |
|
75 | 33.78% |
| Total: | 127 votes | ||
|
I'm glad the games didn't suck, because pre-release the new FE threads were the worst in Games.
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:20 |
|
|
I'm really glad I didn't start looking at those until after release, then. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:39
|
|
|
Any video game that gets real annoying about who your waifu is will inevitably have a bad threadJunior Jr. posted:I didn't know there was a geforce experience beta until the current version hosed up my native resolution, then it failed to install it, had to do it through nvidia's website, and now I can't get my old resolution back. Geforce Experience really just sucks in general, especially because it doesn't have a driver rollback function. They are just that confident that nothing will ever gently caress up for sure definitely, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:39
|
|
|
awakening on normal was a steamroll but the next difficulty up is just more frustrating than challenging. is it any better in the new one
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:39
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:I'm glad the games didn't suck, because pre-release the new FE threads were the worst in Games. can you fix my thread title please
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:40
|
|
|
oddium posted:awakening on normal was a steamroll but the next difficulty up is just more frustrating than challenging. is it any better in the new one Depending on which version but generally yeah. Birthright/Revelations are just generally easier by design but Hard is fun for a while and Lunatic is a manageable challenge. Conquest Normal/Hard/Lunatic descriptions actually make sense and are a lot of fun to try and best, although I've barely scratched a Conquest hard run. Limbering up with Revelations Lunatic first
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
MinibarMatchman posted:what the gently caress are you talking about, that was a great game. atlus didn't make ogre battle
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
In Training posted:Depending on which version but generally yeah. Birthright/Revelations are just generally easier by design but Hard is fun for a while and Lunatic is a manageable challenge. Conquest Normal/Hard/Lunatic descriptions actually make sense and are a lot of fun to try and best, although I've barely scratched a Conquest hard run. Limbering up with Revelations Lunatic first hmm thank you. i'm going to buy one of them
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
oddium posted:awakening on normal was a steamroll but the next difficulty up is just more frustrating than challenging. is it any better in the new one Depends on the path. All of them are at least more interesting, map-wise, than Awakening, but if you want a really satisfying challenge, play the Conquest path on Hard. Conquest Hard/Classic was the most fun I'd had with Fire Emblem in a long time. It had interesting maps full of enemies with clever skill combinations that you really need to plan ahead to work around and I loved that. Birthright and Revelation are both a lot more straightforward, but still less full of "rout the enemy and also instant-acting reinforcements" than Awakening.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
Awakening's difficulty levels were: Normal - A cakewalk. Hard - What Normal mostly should have been, but the gap between Normal and Hard is a bit much for some reason. Lunatic - Hard. Not that much harder than Hard, once you get past the first few chapters, which are absurd. Lunatic+ - DO NOT PLAY
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
oddium posted:hmm thank you. i'm going to buy one of them This Fire Emblem goon would recommend Conquest
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
CJacobs posted:Any video game that gets real annoying about who your waifu is will inevitably have a bad thread So what you're saying is, stay out of the Persona 5 thread/MegaTen Megathread when Persona 5 is close to release? In Training posted:This Fire Emblem goon would recommend Conquest  Conquest owns.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
oddium posted:can you fix my thread title please
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
Harrow posted:So what you're saying is, stay out of the Persona 5 thread/MegaTen Megathread when Persona 5 is close to release? fire emblem threads are bad because they're mostly posts about the most efficient/tactically advantageous ways to marry all of your characters and create perfect skill sets for your war babies
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Link? is a girl, yeah
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Link? should always be a boy because that's canon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
[the sarcastic lol pic Synthy posts]
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Link? i'm on my phone but it's the amiibo thread. can you make it just say "amiibos"
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
oddium posted:i'm on my phone but it's the amiibo thread. can you make it just say "amiibos" amiibros
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
it sucks that any discussion of Fates has to be prefaced with "but the plot is terrible" when the gameplay is like the best in the series
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
The plot of every FE kinda blows though. It's just people looking at each and getting nervous about evil kings and then eventually dragons. Sometimes both at once
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
xcom 2 is making me OCD out I know I should be okay with losing guys or taking hits once in a while but every time I lose a dude i just want to restart I haven't even seen Andromedans yet because of this
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
Raserys posted:it sucks that any discussion of Fates has to be prefaced with "but the plot is terrible" when the gameplay is like the best in the series People who play J and SRPG's tend to be interested in the plot of games.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
Raserys posted:it sucks that any discussion of Fates has to be prefaced with "but the plot is terrible" when the gameplay is like the best in the series Conquest has maybe the worst plot of all of them but the gameplay is so absurdly good that it's 100% worth it. God I loved Conquest. Going to have to play that again soon. I don't think I have it in me to play it on Lunatic though. I'll stick to Hard/Classic, I think. I don't know that I've ever been more pumped to win at video games than when I finished Conquest Hard/Classic without a single death. I didn't even do that in Birthright, but that was just because I was getting kind of bored by the end and wasn't willing to redo the last two chapters when a couple people bit it in the Endgame. Harrow fucked around with this message at 20:07 on Jul 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
Harrow posted:So what you're saying is, stay out of the Persona 5 thread/MegaTen Megathread when Persona 5 is close to release? Yes. Ciaphas posted:xcom 2 is making me OCD out I know how you feel, but the way I mitigate this feeling is by rotating my soldiers so that losing a couple won't gently caress me over. I try to make sure everyone gets out for a bit so they level up at around the same rate. Try bringing a couple rookies (or first-level trained soldiers if you have the training room) with you on missions if you're not doing that already.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
Capcom has apparently admitted the seemingly useless finger in the RE7 demo is just not usable yet. Motherfuckers. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
Dewgy posted:Capcom has apparently admitted the seemingly useless finger in the RE7 demo is just not usable yet. At least they admitted it now and not a year or so later like that pendant in Dark Souls thing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
Ciaphas posted:xcom 2 is making me OCD out Are you playing on Ironman? It's tough to deal with losing soldiers but in XCOM 2 that is just definitely going to happen sometimes. The game is just unpredictable enough that, at least before your soldiers are immortal god-killers and you're swimming in Psi Ops, it's reasonably likely you'll lose a few soldiers along the way and it's okay if you do.
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
Harrow posted:Are you playing on Ironman? nah, regular veteran I know it's ok and all, and to bring rookies once and again, it's just like damnit I liked that guy 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
Name them after people or SA posters you don't like, that way you won't get attached to them 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Ciaphas posted:nah, regular veteran I'm not ashamed to admit I reloaded from auto saves twice in my last XCOM 2 game on Commander. I let a few people die but there were two times when I was like "no, that's bullshit" and loaded. I'm also the guy who restarts the level any time someone dies in Fire Emblem but refuses not to play on Classic so don't ever listen to me 
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
CJacobs posted:Name them after people or SA posters you don't like, that way you won't get attached to them i hope everyone enjoys their army of cool time traveling hitmen
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:People who play J and SRPG's tend to be interested in the plot of games. those people also really enjoy the support conversations in fire emblem, which are still good and fine
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
CJacobs posted:Name them after people or SA posters you don't like, that way you won't get attached to them surely there's a character limit for unit names ??
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
oddium posted:surely there's a character limit for unit names ?? Just name one "All T. Humans" and you'll have it about covered
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
oddium posted:surely there's a character limit for unit names ?? You can shorten FactsAreUseless to FAU
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Phantasium posted:It is basically a beat for beat remake of the original gameboy game, down to enemy AI and amount of dialog. okay that helps me make an informed decision on what to do. Thanks for the info!
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
remember when xcom 2 came out and people were like "bernie sanders soloed this map for me while clinton took donations from the aliens  "
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:You can shorten FactsAreUseless to FAU
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:20 |
|
|
Fax R Usles
|
|
#
?
Jul 1, 2016 21:49
|
|
