|
Pakled posted:I don't know much about the Susan G Komen foundation in particular other than that's what people seem to say about it but "raising awareness" is actually a pretty good tool to fight breast cancer. Universal screening for breast cancer early is ultimately cheaper than allowing the cancer to develop and only treating advanced cases, and if society didn't hammer it in then fewer people would participate. Same thing with pap smears, colonoscopies, etc. That's not true at all, we've long past "awareness" and gone into paranoia about breast cancer. Newer recommendations push screening out later, and dispose with manual checks entirely: http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/20/health/new-acs-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines/
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2016 20:13 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 07:19 |
|
I'm pretty sure Vox and Buzzfeed don't have a cable channel, though.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 19:01 |
|
devtesla posted:That's the company behind this recruiting campaign: Does anyone else secretly despise people who hate those that "coast", I mean, get the gently caress over it, it's not your money rear end in a top hat
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2017 23:21 |
|
Are we talking that Tillamook x TCHO joint or Breyers?
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2017 22:12 |
|
You can always tell an idiot when they don't care about Obama deporting more people than anyone in history, but competing the wall that Bush and Obama voted to build makes you Hitler
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 15:14 |
|
mastershakeman posted:Obama voted for the bill? was it an omnibus? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Fence_Act_of_2006 "It's progressive to build a fence, it's Hitlerian to build a wall" - Liberals Is this purely because chain link is a more materially dialectic substance than corrugated steel?
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 17:58 |
|
Nonsense posted:The Democrats weren't elected to a majority until November that year and George W. Bush was still president. Meh, Obama still voted and spoke publicly in favor of it. That's enough for me and anyone who isn't a Hillbot apologist.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 18:23 |
|
Frank fracked the mountain!
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2017 15:22 |
|
Why would a citizen be happy not to be pulled over? Have they got something to hide?
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2017 17:57 |
|
Just say "T-Mobile is for cucks." Just loving say it.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 18:29 |
|
It's happening because the Kochs are brilliant: https://www.democracynow.org/2015/7/15/strange_bedfellows_why_are_the_koch Same thing is happening with energy: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/business/energy-environment/koch-brothers-fossil-fuels-minorities.html "Solar power and net neutrality are racist" is coming and it's going to be loving hilarious. call to action has issued a correction as of 00:07 on Feb 14, 2017 |
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 00:03 |
|
As long as you realize that a "first amendment above all" organization will never support "bash the fash", give away!
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 20:55 |
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:"Hmmmmm a pay-what-you-want bundle of some insanely sick video games if only it wasn't donating to the ACLU" - a fucktard
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2017 00:18 |
|
Personally I hope the speeches focus on why it was good to kill Al-Awlaki's son, but bad to kill his daughter
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2017 19:37 |
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:here's one woke fukkin ad Some little girls get to be empowered, others get to have their forearms double-stitched to a synthetic shoe upper, but it's so hard to tell which one should be which y'know
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2017 20:27 |
|
I'd donate blood and platelets more often if I weren't just donating a bunch of poo poo that then goes on to be sold to patients at incredibly high prices
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2017 23:12 |
|
fits my needs posted:Ummm, why would someone want to listen to them? Because LF was by far the most interesting thing that ever happened on this dead gay forum?
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2017 22:51 |
|
Buca di Bepis posted:3 white thirty somethings talking about leftism lol Erasing women and POC isn't cool, do better please
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 19:53 |
|
get that OUT of my face posted:wokeness is about self-flagellation of the more privileged instead of lifting up the less privileged
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 23:13 |
|
Sure it's a brand owned by the Koch brothers, but putting an attractive white woman on a product package is brave. I'm conflicted.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2017 22:33 |
|
The idea of giving a home to homeless people is nice, but then again I spend all my waking hours wanting to kill myself at a job I hate so I can afford my house... Fuckin' capitalism.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2017 18:57 |
|
Andorra posted:Beyonce performed for Gaddafi's family. So? Gaddafi was awesome.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2017 19:09 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:Source your quotes. What's this supposed to be about
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2017 19:26 |
|
Why didn't they just give the $100MM to the families whose kids go to the schools, it's no loving shock why Newark has bad schools (it's full of poor people)
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2017 22:35 |
|
an actual dog posted:Woke brand was maybe not so woke: Thinx Promised a Feminist Utopia to Everyone But Its Employees I love how the article gets a dig in at *white men* even though nearly all the employees and the people who gave them a raise were women
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2017 22:58 |
|
Troy Queef posted:you think their ads are bad? their PR emails they send to news outlets are worse (CAUTION: it's Jezebel): http://jezebel.com/a-celebration-of-the-beautiful-lightly-deranged-pr-ema-1784978795 AHAHAHAH they loving gave a 34% discount to celebrate women getting paid 78% as much, oh my loving god I'm dying over here
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2017 23:23 |
|
The Kingfish posted:Dan Carlin all but came out in support for single payer on his last show. More importantly, he denounced tax credits and the 50 state system as being obviously terrible. This blew me away. He's finally dropping the false equivalency nonsense and revealing his true socialist spirit.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2017 16:17 |
|
Equality ad in blue states, Football ad in red states. Target your digital marketing with Google.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 15:49 |
|
Note how honeybees are the only pollinators called out, because they are the only ones that matter to General Mills
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 16:50 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Well again no, because only 47% of of people under 24 are more likely to buy something advertised that way, whereas way more than 47% believe in equality. And I'm just going out on a limb here, but maybe it's because they realize the appeals are opportunistic and meaningless, like this thread is about. In which Jeb! Repetition learned about message segmentation (Hint: it's how Bud Light can advertise to gays and rednecks at the same time)
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 19:52 |
|
No one is immune to all advertising, most people are immune to most advertising (because most advertising sucks)
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 19:52 |
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:learning about finance and investing is something only the 1% can do: fact thinking that the difference between being well off and and not well off in this god forsaken country is due primarily to financial knowledge and not luck/station of birth/available jobs and their wages: silly
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 20:34 |
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:i didnt say that at all you mondo retard the majority of people in this country can't cover a $500 unexpected expense, advocating for their financial literacy should be like fourteenth on your priority list after higher wages, affordable healthcare, affordable childcare, affordable education, smash racism/patriarchy, (a billion other things), financial literacy but if only they used a low expense ratio index fund to invest the extra -$100 in income they had, they'd be set, yessiree
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 20:46 |
|
I feel fine doubling down on the notion that, if you can't handle a $500 expense, it's probably because you don't make enough money instead of a lack of self-flagellation on the altar of John C. Bogle (if you'll notice, the post that started this tangent was regarding Morgan Stanley, who I'm pretty sure is going to "educate" you into assuming as much debt as possible instead of how to balance a checkbook)
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 21:09 |
|
VOTE YES ON 69 posted:sure, maybe if you presuppose that people aren't utterly brainwashed by capitalism and pitted against a predatory financial industry trying to claw every dollar (especially future-earned dollars) out of their hands Luckily Morgan Stanley doesn't give a flying gently caress whether you put that vacation on credit or up your rear end, all they want is the fees on your retirement fund. I read the article and all I saw was "save more" aka "give us more money to charge a fee on", not "be less materialistic" or "here's a cheap way to fix your fridge" - and anybody that can't read between the lines on why Morgan Stanley doesn't talk about that latter part of financial education (being frugal) is a maroon call to action has issued a correction as of 22:03 on Mar 20, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 22:00 |
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:wow dude you might be too woke for this thread Man, I sure try but hopefully I'll be woke enough to defend Morgan Stanley soon just like my hero deray
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 22:21 |
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:Well guys this thread had a good run. Yeah you'd think so until /r/personalfinance got sicced on me
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 20:53 |
|
Is the irony in that L-MM clip that he's using the words of a Latino dude to rep a guy who has never done anything for minorities
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2017 14:49 |
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:the cool thing ive noticed about women in stem is that the acronym also works as a line graph of how many women there are in the field So why are mathematics programs so much more sexist than biology programs?
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2017 21:01 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 07:19 |
|
I can't decide if my favorite part is the completely apolitical signs or the crowd that literally claps and cheers when a cop drinks a soda
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2017 14:25 |