|
LuciferMorningstar posted:R is actually really good and there is documentation absolutely everywhere for it. What are you trying to do? troll, poorly 
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 18:45 |
|
|
R is good and its used because lowly grad students cant shell out the 100,000$ for 1 copy of SAS. I migt be able to gelp you with your R troubles PM me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
R is really good I'm going to second you install rstudio though I didn't for awhile and now regret all the time I resisted using it. If you haven't already you should check out the ggplot2 package for statistical graphics it takes a little more syntax to get what you want but when you figure it out its way better than base graphics. The biggest problem with r I have is that you're always trying to get factors into a numeric class and I don't understand why I can't just call them numeric without calling them character first
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
my dick r very big
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
root beer posted:my dick r very big analyze that statistic 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
milkman dad posted:R is really good I'm going to second you install rstudio though I didn't for awhile and now regret all the time I resisted using it. All of this is true and goddammit get rstudio right now. Unfortunately, I have yet to find a good GUI that lets you input your data like a spreadsheet (I could never get JGR to loving work, thanks Java) so all you can do is suck it up and do it the normal pain-in-the-rear end way, but at least do it with rstudio. Have you looked at places like Cookbook for R? It's been pretty helpful for me for the basics, I've been able to make templates for myself so most of the work is already done. There are some decent guides for ggplot2 as well.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
my wife does statistical analysis in R and it works for her. git gud maybe
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
Mange Mite posted:what is matlab even for Modeling PID loops?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Titus Sardonicus posted:All of this is true and goddammit get rstudio right now. Unfortunately, I have yet to find a good GUI that lets you input your data like a spreadsheet (I could never get JGR to loving work, thanks Java) so all you can do is suck it up and do it the normal pain-in-the-rear end way, but at least do it with rstudio. if you have data you can most efficiently enter manually, why not just put it in a spreadsheet and import to R?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
Statistica is underrated imo, it has great output organisation and formatting options. Spss is the default, but is actually pretty bad. R is for when your employer hires you to do statistical work but refuses to pay for a stats package, which is all the time so it's worth learning I guess.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
I just wish I could have more than two separate Y-axis in Excel.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
While we're talking about R has anyone every compiled a binary or something out of R? I would like to make widgets but don't want them all jacked up.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
milkman dad posted:While we're talking about R has anyone every compiled a binary or something out of R? I would like to make widgets but don't want them all jacked up. i don't know what you're trying to do but it sounds like you should make a webapp with python
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
Maybe in a 'it's the worst statistics package apart from all the others' sort of sense but otherwise 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
R is now integrated in SQL Server 2016 which is super great because we upgraded already
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
I use R every day for work, and it's amazing. However, I use python for some things as well (mostly visualization). Try some of the simpler stuff in python to mix things up (also it's quicker). I need to learn SQL for work. Anyone got some sick resources?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
William Stoner posted:I use R every day for work, and it's amazing. you can learn sql in an hour. actually less.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
unless you're a baboon, that is. then you'll need 2 hours
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
R or NumPy are the best ways to stat.Mange Mite posted:what is matlab even for Modeling ghost boners underneath orange sheets
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Celluloid Sam posted:my middle and last name both start with R JRR Tokin'
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Piso Mojado posted:unless you're a baboon, that is. then you'll need 2 hours am a baboon
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:17
|
|
|
R has a really nice ide but all I'm doing so far is copying text out of a math book so far honestly statistics seems more hosed than anything R could do, in general
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
William Stoner posted:am a baboon I'm sorry.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
Acne Rain posted:R has a really nice ide but all I'm doing so far is copying text out of a math book so far stats is literally just knowing the right equation and display to get your argument across or call bullshit on someone else. 90% of my stats side of my job is just referencing which test to use then plugging in some stuff to R.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
William Stoner posted:stats is literally just knowing the right equation and display to get your argument across or call bullshit on someone else. just sounds like you got a lovely job to me
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:26
|
|
|
yeah, but that's not usually how you think with math and there's actually two different kinds of stats, frequentist and bayesian, and they come from different ways of thinking about what probability and they result in completely different formulas and approaches
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:29
|
|
|
How do I get good at R? Like, is there a step by step guide to getting good at this poo poo, as somebody starting from zero?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:How do I get good at R? Like, is there a step by step guide to getting good at this poo poo, as somebody starting from zero? coursera has some decent classes
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
Which statistics software package looks like poo poo, has an unintuitive interface and hidden settings that deviate from best practice stats? Trick question, the answer is all of them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 08:55
|
|
|
this thread was created as a nerd honeypot
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 11:15
|
|
|
i don't like statistics or math and i think they should both go away
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 11:25
|
|
|
A Stupid Baby posted:i don't like statistics or math and i think they should both go away Never before have I seen such a perfect username / post combo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 11:40
|
|
|
Celluloid Sam posted:my middle and last name both start with R Bob Reginald Rectum?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 11:48
|
|
|
Yeah R is great as a statistical package and loving amazing to work with datasets, but it takes a bit of getting used to. Rstudio is loving required. I'm mostly self-taught in R so did the initial Coursera module in R to get a certificate. There's a hefty difficulty spike in it though. I've seen a lot of economists switch to programming to make their models, Italians in particular with agent-based modelling. The guys who become experts in visualisation must rake in the dosh because the poo poo I see them do is amazing. root beer posted:analyze that statistic >rootbeer_dicksize<quantile(sa_dicksizes)[2] 25% TRUE School Nickname fucked around with this message at 11:59 on Aug 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 11:53
|
|
|
Pick posted:I'm just curious if R is the worst program for statistics ever invented by a human being, or if somehow, somewhere out there, there is some sort of program which is in some way shittier than R. if so, please let me know, so I can feel better about the situation where R is a thing I have to use. thank you all so kindly. spss
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 12:42
|
|
|
I really don't see what's wrong with just using the calculator windows provides?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 12:51
|
|
|
Use tableu or prism if you are a retard like me
Whooping Crabs fucked around with this message at 13:18 on Aug 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
Saint Isaias Boner posted:as bad as spss is, pspp is an order of magnitude worse as should be expected i guess good point. I forgot about pspp because it's so bad. lol.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
Real men use SAS and revel in a nice clean & lean 12 GB Sas Foundation install 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 14:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 18:45 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cp0Yhlhoovg
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2016 14:26
|
|