|
Happy to see that these accomplished plagiarists are back releasing a new project. Their PR people's revisionist history will inevitably insist that the reason their trio of records simultaneously released flopped years ago was due to the singer's drinking problem finally boiling over instead of the simple fact that the entire project was poo poo. There are NO great triple records in music history, let alone 3 records simultaneously released. The best thing that could happen was for them to flop in order for a producer to be given the latitude of doubt and actually serve as a voice of reason and editor, instead of enabling indulgence.
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 20, 2024 12:11 |
|
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:that's not a triple album I'm not a doofus, poser. There's nobody who has released 3 records simultaneously to great success. There are artists who dropped 2 records at once - for example, Guns n Roses 'Use Your Illusions 1 & 1' (not my favorite example, btw) - and found success, bu to release three practically at once the way Green Day did...no loving way. As soon as you hear 'triple album' that should be an alert that whoever was guiding the band said 'gently caress it', took the money and mentally checked out.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
Cemetry Gator posted:69 Love Songs would like to argue with you. I'm just saying. I humbly will make exception for The Clash and promise to reconsider The Magentic Fields in the near future.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 10:29
|
|