Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

This is the Games Workshop Is Bad chat thread.

How this thread works
This thread tends to be a meandering chat thread as much as it is a thread about the specific topic of how bad Games Workshop the company is. So here's an overly detailed guide to this thread:
  1. Games Workshop (GW) is a terrible game company in the United Kingdom. Feel free to post and discuss the numerous ways they are terrible, and why.
  2. GW periodically does things, such as release products, file semiannual and annual financial reports, run or attend events, hire and fire people, open and close shops, etc. Whenever GW does something, feel free to post and discuss that.
  3. On most days, GW hasn't done anything in particular. Like normal human beings having a conversation, the topic can wander, and that's OK.
  4. That said, it is not cool to try to force the dominant topic of this thread into being about something totally unrelated to GW... like, say, anime. If what you really want is to chat a whole lot about something else, make a thread about it in an appropriate subforum and have a ball. Especially when there's already an entire subforum about that particular topic (like anime).
  5. And having said that, the only thing more annoying than some jerk who tries to make every single conversation be about the one thing he cares about, is having a dozen people constantly piling in to point that guy out, because then the conversation becomes about that guy and that's still really off topic and annoying. So just report anime posts and move on.
  6. If you think GW is good or if you like one or more of their products or if you just gave them money, hey guess what: we don't give a poo poo, nobody is shocked or offended. We probably think you made a mistake, but it's not like you murdered an orphan and we are aware of that. If you drop into the thread and try to be edgy with your pro-GW opinions or smugly inform everyone that we're engaging in "a circle-jerk" you will probably not get the outraged litany of hurt responses you were hoping for. Most of us in the thread have given GW money at some time or another. Why, just recently I bought the Warhammer: Total War video game, which means some proportion of my money went to GW in the form of a licensing fee. Warhammer: Total War is a cool and good game, though, so nobody cares.
  7. If you refer back to #1, you may recall that GW, a company based in England which makes nerd game stuff, is bad. It's important to remember that, because it is true, and if you forget, you might find yourself accidentally giving money to GW for bad things.
  8. As an easy way to keep this in mind, try this simple exercise. Every morning when you wake up, say out loud to yourself "Do not give money to Games Workshop. Games Workshop is bad." Say it three times.

So that's how this thread works. If you didn't read that stuff, that's OK, :justpost: and it will probably work out.

Games Workshop is Bad Resources
This is the third (I think) entry in the Games Workshop: Terrible Company series. There are several GW-related threads going at any given time.
  • Here is the previous GW Sucks thread. Warning: it contains quite a lot of anime and gundams, because it took like two years for boom boom boom to finally get banned. It also has dozens of extremely good posts about how bad GW is, as well as some deep discussions of gundams, heavy metal music, and "fun" as measure of a game's worth. Note that previously, the GW sucks threads were nominally "death threads" in which goons placed informal wagers on when GW would collapse and die; there is no sign of that ever happening, but feel free to place new bets in this thread if you feel the urge.
  • Here's the thread that came before that one, the 2014-15 Death Thread. It also contains many of my effortposts about how bad GW is, and is therefore worth skimming just for that.
  • Here is the Warhammer Fantasy Battle thread. Warhammer Fantasy Battle is a dead game, replaced by Age of Sigmar, which is bad. So this thread is now mostly about how GW is bad, but with a specific focus on the Fantasy tabletop battle aspects of its badness. It's a good place to ask questions about alternative, better tabletop fantasy-themed wargames, such as Kings of War. Although you can also ask about Kings of War in the Mantic thread, because Mantic make Kings of War.
  • Here is the GW Specialist Games thread. This is a pretty focused thread about GW's lesser-known games, such as Epic, Mordheim, Battlefleet Gothic, Blood Bowl, and Gorka-Morka.
  • Here is the Warhammer 40k thread. It is also referred to as The Bad Thread, because a number of posters in this thread are in denial about GW being bad, and especially about their flagship game, Warhammer 40k, being especially bad.
  • Here is the Warhammer 30k thread. GW has successfully tricked a bunch of 40k fans into thinking that because 30k is entirely about Space Marines, it's a more "balanced" game and therefore not terrible. This thread represents the honeymoon period of a newish GW spinoff game. Come back in ten years to help these poor bastards cope with the thousands of dollars they wasted on a game that GW eventually ruined and/or killed.
  • Here is the Warhammer Skull Appreciation Thread. Previously this thread and its several predecessors were located in GBS: now it's consigned to a ghetto of BYOB, because GBS mods get all weepy when GBS threads become popular and last for more than a couple of days. This thread is sometimes referred to as The Good Thread.


Why Games Workshop is Bad
If you are not intimately familiar with Games Workshop's history, products, corporate structure, market position, or (especially) customers and fans, you might feel like having a whole thread just about how GW is bad and why is excessive and weird. But it isn't, because GW isn't just bad, it's fascinatingly bad. The badness of GW takes myriad forms. It has been bad in genuinely interesting ways. It can be engaging and fun to explore those ways in detail.
Also, for many of us, this thread is somewhat cathartic. There are a lot of former (and nearly-former) GW customers here. Some of us spent decades being fans of one or more of GW's games or product lines. That relationship was generally abusive, especially towards the end. It's therapeutic to discuss how we were abused, especially with other former victims. (No, none of us think GW loving with us is in any way equivalent to sexual abuse or something, shut up.)

So here is a short list summarizing why GW is bad. I will also in the future link to specific posts that explore one or more of these items in detail, if someone posts them.
  • As a rule, GW's products are wildly overpriced
  • As a rule, GW's games are very badly designed
  • GW's executives are demonstrably incompetent, and yet simultaneously arrogantly overconfident
  • GW is extremely litigious, despite frequently having little or no legal foundation for its litigation, which has led to spectacular failures in court
  • GW's website, which it famously spent millions of pounds "upgrading," is terrible
  • GW has squandered decades of goodwill by repeatedly screwing many of its most loyal and longest-lived fans
  • GW more or less entirely ignores the existence of serious competition, to its detriment
  • GW's fictional settings - in particular the Warhammer Fantasy and Warhammer 40k/30k settings - are mostly derivitave badly-written schlock
  • The few redeeming qualities and compelling aspects of these settings have been repeatedly made worse, including the recent complete destruction of the 30-year-old Fantasy setting
  • GW gets a large portion of its revenue from third-party sellers of its products, but it is extremely abusive of those third-party sellers
  • GW's executives, in particular Executive Chairman and former CEO Tom Kirby, are openly contemptuous of their customers
  • Tom Kirby has repeatedly asserted that GW does no market research (and it shows)
  • GW has killed off its best games while maintaining its worst games
  • GW makes little or no use of social media to connect with its customers and fans
  • Many of GW's fans and the players of its games are stupid, annoying, or both; the company is either blind to this or actively encourages douchebaggery by its customers
  • GW's sales practices are predatory, particularly towards its youngest customers
  • Despite all of the above, GW frustratingly remains a profitable company that dominates the UK market and maintains a very large presence in the worldwide market of tabletop miniatures wargaming, which in many cases means better games and products cannot survive at retail

I'm sure I missed some items so feel free to point them out and I'll update this list.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



:siren:do not give GW money:siren:

evilmiera
Dec 14, 2009

Status: Ravenously Rambunctious
About those rumors of an End Times thing for 40k, has that been confirmed yet or did it all turn out to be just more fanmade crap?

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

A few months back, I was browsing through a local comics/collectibles/comics store when a vaguely-baffled soccer mom wandered in, looking for things to entertain her six-or-seven-year-old child

"This stuff's all pretty expensive," she mused, after a while. "How about that...uh, Games Workshop store, next door?"

The store owner overheard this and spent a good five minutes patiently and helpfully explaining that GW is an expensive and terrible hobby company whose products can't really be used by small children anyway.

This proprietor was a good man and, while I couldn't afford to buy much of his stuff myself, I was glad to subsequently introduce some of my wealthier friends (the kind of nerds who can happily drop $60 on Star Wars merch in a weekend) to his shop.

Gravitas Shortfall
Jul 17, 2007

Utility is seven-eighths Proximity.


Ground floor on another good thread. I still enjoy the 40K background, because it's gigantic, ornate, and horrible like your mum. but it took me far too long to realise that I like the IDEA of the setting more than whatever they're currently doing with it.

FrostyPox
Feb 8, 2012

THIS JUST IN:

Games Workshop is still a bad company that makes bad games.

kingcom
Jun 23, 2012

Ground floor, go play with X-wangs instead. They are pretty good and cool.

Sir Teabag
Oct 26, 2007
I was recently in a LGS in Montreal and they had an entire wall of 40K, the bottom shelf was all those board games that also use 40K minis and then there was a tiny section for Age of Sigmar. The section for Infinity was larger than the AoS shelf and it made me smile because sometimes good things happen.

That's my story

Runa
Feb 13, 2011

I'm not going to place a wager on the death of Games Workshop because I'm not a gambling man

PupsOfWar posted:

A few months back, I was browsing through a local comics/collectibles/comics store when a vaguely-baffled soccer mom wandered in, looking for things to entertain her six-or-seven-year-old child

"This stuff's all pretty expensive," she mused, after a while. "How about that...uh, Games Workshop store, next door?"

The store owner overheard this and spent a good five minutes patiently and helpfully explaining that GW is an expensive and terrible hobby company whose products can't really be used by small children anyway.

This proprietor was a good man and, while I couldn't afford to buy much of his stuff myself, I was glad to subsequently introduce some of my wealthier friends (the kind of nerds who can happily drop $60 on Star Wars merch in a weekend) to his shop.

Sounds like a good FLGS owner.

grassy gnoll
Aug 27, 2006

The pawsting business is tough work.
fun Fun FUN

Chakan
Mar 30, 2011
September, 2016

e:

moola posted:

GW is good.

Chakan fucked around with this message at 03:44 on Aug 22, 2016

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh
Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

Sir Teabag
Oct 26, 2007
LMAO are those all skulls?

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh

Sir Teabag posted:

LMAO are those all skulls?

Poorly-rendered words:

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

While I haven't payed attention to GW for a while, I did have to laugh recently when I happened to check and see that their products are now twice the cost that they were ten years ago, which was already prohibitively expensive for me, at the time a tween hypothetically interested in hobby gaming

reliably 100-200% more expensive than analogous products from their smaller competitors (despite those competitors presumably having less production infrastructure to work with), to say nothing of generic mini manufacturers that don't publish a gaming ruleset


Avenging Dentist posted:

Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

this flying gun-brick seems useful to the subtle, precise and secretive force that is Deathwatch

PupsOfWar fucked around with this message at 03:58 on Aug 22, 2016

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



Avenging Dentist posted:

Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

i thought this was a tau thing

Runa
Feb 13, 2011

I actually think it looks rad in a dumpy, adorable kind of way.

A lot better than most Space Marine flyers and skimmers, imo

potentiallycool
Nov 7, 2011

Homie
Fallen Rib

Avenging Dentist posted:

Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

Cos I'm an idiot I kinda like it. But it's fuckin' $130 NZD for 1 model that probably costs like 150 points. And that is the thing with GW, I can buy entire armies for that price if a Death Watch army was only this thing, 5 guys and a HQ then cool but it's not.

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh
It just looks like the Valkyrie's overweight, Hot Topic-shopping brother to me.

FrostyPox
Feb 8, 2012

I kind of like it but it's a really expensive model for a very bad game so thanks but no thanks, GW, gonna pass

S.J.
May 19, 2008

Just who the hell do you think we are?

An excellent OP from an excellent poster for what will inevitably be a terrible thread. Hell yeah.

Not a viking
Aug 2, 2008

Feels like I just got laid

Sir Teabag posted:

I was recently in a LGS in Montreal and they had an entire wall of 40K, the bottom shelf was all those board games that also use 40K minis and then there was a tiny section for Age of Sigmar. The section for Infinity was larger than the AoS shelf and it made me smile because sometimes good things happen.

That's my story

The biggest national chain for nerd poo poo and games recently stopped taking in Infinity :(

At least they started taking in WMH in the store in my town, so at least something is happening!

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all
One thing I've always found fascinating about GW's pricing is how it affects people's perspective of the pricing of competitors. When people look at a GW model and it's $100 for a single plastic kit and then see that they can get a good sized Kings of War army for that price, the reaction isn't that GW is overpriced, but that Mantic (or whoever) must have some terrible secret that's keeping their prices down. Slave labor? Not compensating their artists? Selling at a loss to try and gain market share? I remember in the 90s and the early 00s, one of the only bits of outreach GW did to its fans was in its careful explanations that no, seriously, molds are expensive and even though we haven't updated the models at all, we have to raise prices... for reasons. And fans went through the same cycle every time. First was outrage followed by threatening to quit the hobby forever. Then there was a rush on models before the impending price hike and they swore that would be the last they purchased. Then GW released a new codex or edition and surprise surprise these guys came back every single time.

wdarkk
Oct 26, 2007

Friends: Protected
World: Saved
Crablettes: Eaten

Avenging Dentist posted:

Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

It's not THAT bad. I mean, it's only in the double digits for real dollars.

It's still only slightly bigger than a Dropfleet battleship for 50% more.

Kai Tave
Jul 2, 2012
Fallen Rib

T.G. Xarbala posted:

I actually think it looks rad in a dumpy, adorable kind of way.

A lot better than most Space Marine flyers and skimmers, imo

It's the sort of thing that if it had been made 20 years ago people would have a lot of nostalgic fondness for but as a new release from the Premier Tabletop Miniatures for Maybe Gaming Sometimes company Games Workshop it doesn't seem very good to me.

S.J.
May 19, 2008

Just who the hell do you think we are?

Kai Tave posted:

It's the sort of thing that if it had been made 20 years ago people would have a lot of nostalgic fondness for but as a new release from the Premier Tabletop Miniatures for Maybe Gaming Sometimes company Games Workshop it doesn't seem very good to me.

It also seems like it isn't matching the overall aesthetic of the deathwatch in the story, where they work in small, elite teams, purposefully differentiated from normal space marine style engagements where they can quickly get in and out of bad situations, IRL special forces style. This screams the same kind of grandiose, bombastic kinds of full scale engagements that you'd expect from the Space Wolves or Blood Angels or whatever.

lovestick
Feb 11, 2006

~30303030303~


There are only 4 visible skulls on this flying brick space marine thing. Disappointing.

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



i mean seriously i thought the big lenses and angular panels were tau

Avenging Dentist
Oct 1, 2005

oh my god is that a circular saw that does not go in my mouth aaaaagh
It's a bad model for a lot of reasons:

  • As mentioned by S.J., it's really off-message for the Deathwatch, whose whole thing is that they're a small team of elite Space Marines that do special ops poo poo related to Xenos. I get that they want something like a Valkyrie, but it should evoke more of a "black helicopters" look than a "heavy gunship" look.
  • While it's better than the truly-awful Space Marine flyers, it still looks like "box with wings".
  • Despite being produced by the "best" tabletop model-maker in the world, the doors don't open, there's no interior detail, you can't extend the landing gear, and there's not even a pilot! How hard is it to have a little pilot dude like every other flyer in your range?
  • The guns are just all over the place and look dumb as hell. While some of them are optional, they still ruin the lines of the model, such as they are.
  • It's a fat Valkyrie. Pay the extra $1 and get a real Valkyrie.
  • It's called the Corvus Blackstar.

It's actually worse than the Land Raider kit. A kit which, in case you've forgotten, is full of design elements that make no sense (e.g. the treads are basically on backwards), has nowhere for the driver to go, and has no means of getting to the top hatches. Not that a Space Marine could fit his shoulderpads through those hatches anyway. I don't demand "realism" from my science fiction dollies, but I do demand that things make a vague kind of sense, and also that they look cool.

Avenging Dentist fucked around with this message at 07:29 on Aug 22, 2016

Gravitas Shortfall
Jul 17, 2007

Utility is seven-eighths Proximity.


I was thinking the other day how it would be possible for GW to make posable, snap-fit Space Marine sprues that were 3(or more) color right out of the box.

Add ball joints for (at least) the shoulders and hips. Miniatures plastic is pretty soft so wouldn't stand up to constant rotation, but the idea is that you snap the arms and legs on and pose them while the plastic cement is still melty.

Colored sprues for the big selling chapters, based on a generic core.

The main sprue would be whatever color the marine armor is. Let's say Ultramarines, so blue. You'd engineer it so that this was the majority of the figure, but had easy snap-in points for the secondary color sprue.

The secondary sprue would be things like the chest aquilla, shoulderpad trim, and captain's helmet. Hell, have all Space Marine shoulderpads have a port for moulded chapter logos and throw a selection on the sprue (or include them in chapter specific boxes).

Then have a tertiary sprue in black or dark grey that's weapons, pouches, grenades, bits and pieces. Could even go the whole hog and put half the backpack on the main sprue and half on the tertiary sprue so you get "metal" details on it.

Basically, take advantage of their market share and captial to push the envelope, do a bunch of poo poo that their competitors can't.

But no. Instead, flying bricks.

IanTheM
May 22, 2007
He came from across the Atlantic. . .

Business Gorillas posted:

i mean seriously i thought the big lenses and angular panels were tau


Tau have the only vehicles in 40k that mildly look like modern scifi technology. Anyway, vehicles in 40k seem to be their biggest racket. I don't understand what scale airplane and tank manufacturers know that GW doesn't, or are people really just willing to dish out that much money for a plane, or are they adjusting the price higher to justify the prices for the minis...

IanTheM fucked around with this message at 09:39 on Aug 22, 2016

Safety Factor
Oct 31, 2009




Grimey Drawer

Leperflesh posted:

[*]Here is the Warhammer 30k thread. GW has successfully tricked a bunch of 40k fans into thinking that because 30k is entirely about Space Marines, it's a more "balanced" game and therefore not terrible. This thread represents the honeymoon period of a newish GW spinoff game. Come back in ten years to help these poor bastards cope with the thousands of dollars they wasted on a game that GW eventually ruined and/or killed.
Why hello there. :shepspends:

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

I like Oldhammer stuff,

Luckily buying old WFRP books from game stores and appreciating Russ Nicholson art doesn't involve giving GW a red cent. Unfortunately their terrible nature also means that there is a 0% chance of them putting say, the Realms of Chaos books up on drivethru, given their fear of digital and belief that it's self-competition. I would buy those because the actual books cost the souls of newborns on ebay. I'm legit surprised that they allow FFG to put up WFRP 2e books.

I have never gotten into WH mini stuff, beyond playing with friends' armies, lucky me.

TTerrible
Jul 15, 2005
30k is a good game and they'll never ruin it he doesn't hit me any more we're going to have a baby

NTRabbit
Aug 15, 2012

i wear this armour to protect myself from the histrionics of hysterical women

bitches




Ground floor advice - take your ex-fantasy minis, and go play Mantic's Kings of War, a game that is cool and good.

Also


Avenging Dentist posted:

Absolutely everything about this product makes me laugh:

The Deathwatch Corvus Blackstar



A name only George Lucas could love

Avenging Dentist posted:

It's a bad model for a lot of reasons:

  • As mentioned by S.J., it's really off-message for the Deathwatch, whose whole thing is that they're a small team of elite Space Marines that do special ops poo poo related to Xenos. I get that they want something like a Valkyrie, but it should evoke more of a "black helicopters" look than a "heavy gunship" look.
  • While it's better than the truly-awful Space Marine flyers, it still looks like "box with wings".
  • Despite being produced by the "best" tabletop model-maker in the world, the doors don't open, there's no interior detail, you can't extend the landing gear, and there's not even a pilot! How hard is it to have a little pilot dude like every other flyer in your range?
  • The guns are just all over the place and look dumb as hell. While some of them are optional, they still ruin the lines of the model, such as they are.
  • It's a fat Valkyrie. Pay the extra $1 and get a real Valkyrie.
  • It's called the Corvus Blackstar.

GCPS TAD-65 'Hornet' transport



Enforcer 'Accuser' Interceptor


Solved tbh

NTRabbit fucked around with this message at 10:33 on Aug 22, 2016

Irate Tree
Mar 12, 2011

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

NTRabbit posted:

Ground floor advice - take your ex-fantasy minis, and go play Mantic's Kings of War, a game that is cool and good.

Also



GCPS TAD-65 'Hornet' transport



Enforcer 'Accuser' Interceptor


Solved tbh
TORNADODO



https://www.miniaturescenery.com/ProductPage.asp?Code=VH1DODO

NTRabbit
Aug 15, 2012

i wear this armour to protect myself from the histrionics of hysterical women

bitches





This is also cool and good, as is his Y2K Peregrine freighter, coming soon





Laser cut MDF and card. Amazing.

http://s434.photobucket.com/user/Mousemuffins1/library/CNC%20miniature%20scenery/freighter?sort=3&page=1

Drone
Aug 22, 2003

Incredible machine
:smug:


NTRabbit posted:

This is also cool and good, as is his Y2K Peregrine freighter, coming soon





Laser cut MDF and card. Amazing.

http://s434.photobucket.com/user/Mousemuffins1/library/CNC%20miniature%20scenery/freighter?sort=3&page=1

That's super Star Wars-y and good, but uh... how does the pilot get into the front seat of the cockpit? There's a door there at the back of the cockpit and maybe I could see the rear pilot crawling in there, but the front pilot looks pretty hopeless.

Unless the ship is crewed by scrunts. In which case, carry on.

Irate Tree
Mar 12, 2011

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Drone posted:

That's super Star Wars-y and good, but uh... how does the pilot get into the front seat of the cockpit? There's a door there at the back of the cockpit and maybe I could see the rear pilot crawling in there, but the front pilot looks pretty hopeless.

Unless the ship is crewed by scrunts. In which case, carry on.

I'd like to think that they have to squeeze past each other, every time they want to get in and out, the guy in back getting a face full of sweaty arse whenever they happen to get to their seat first.
You could say the chairs swivel, as well, if you really wanted.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all

Drone posted:

That's super Star Wars-y and good, but uh... how does the pilot get into the front seat of the cockpit? There's a door there at the back of the cockpit and maybe I could see the rear pilot crawling in there, but the front pilot looks pretty hopeless.

Unless the ship is crewed by scrunts. In which case, carry on.

Looks like there's a gap between the wall and the seats with tiny little steps on it.

  • Locked thread