|
budgieinspector posted:We are of the same vintage, I suspect. The only one missing for me -- and this is way back in the early, early development: genesplicer posted:Dude, there's a difference between funny and really loving creepy. Learn the difference.
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2016 09:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 16:49 |
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
generative grammer posted:pretty sure 1960s disney employed a lot of pervs and pedos so this was 100% intentional What was? 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2016 12:52
|
|
|
There is nothing even slightly sexual or suggestive in either of the images you posted. You're weird.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2016 12:55
|
|
|
Ahh, back in the day when you could put poo poo like this in kids' movies with no backlash  Also uhh... what is this from?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2016 13:04
|
|
|
Dreadwroth posted:Wizards, definitely not a kids film. My parents taught me that all cartoons are for kids and I believe I am a better person for having watched Heavy Metal and Fist of the North Star at age nine. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
Lol apparently there's not a single acclaimed filmmaker in the entire world who doesn't want to gently caress underage girls
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 08:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 16:49 |
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Some us prefer a small, round rear end, buddy Do you direct movies?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 09:59
|
|