|
I'm a filthy casual, but this is fun e: I should probably make that shroud... Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Apr 25, 2017 |
# ¿ Apr 25, 2017 21:54 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 04:47 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2017 10:39 |
|
PJOmega posted:Could you link to some of these articles? http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/limited-information/definition-bomb-2013-06-12 http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/latest-developments/why-bomb-rares-exist-2016-06-10
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 19:56 |
|
updated: new:
|
# ¿ May 4, 2017 19:19 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:I definitely like the old version more. I felt the old one was a bit too wordy, but I cleaned up its templating. I think I agree PMush Perfect posted:This one's just straight-up busted. I don't play much competitive so it can be hard for me to tell if its broken. I guess its: - You can use the ability when the card hits the table. - Since you can use the graveyard, you get a free extra use out of it if its in your hand - Four (five) castings is alot - Even tho its expensive, there are too many ways to cheat the card onto the battlefield, so the cost alone can't justify something that powerful. I will make a single attempt to fix it. Its probably still broke as gently caress tho. If so, oh well, I will move on rather than salvage it
|
# ¿ May 4, 2017 21:30 |
|
Should be called "Hot Potato"
|
# ¿ May 8, 2017 11:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2017 18:04 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:
Why is it silver bordered? It's the best card!
|
# ¿ May 17, 2017 01:16 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2017 20:42 |
|
Would -1/-0 be more workable? I thought these were too complex for uncommon, but mana-fixing rocks might be pointless at rare?
|
# ¿ May 19, 2017 20:48 |
|
ungulateman posted:Also the way they're currently worded you only need one colored mana symbol of any of those colors to turn them on, which makes them even better than you probably intended. (Compare the multicolored gods' wording to see what I mean.) You are very correct. Thank you for helping me out TheChirurgeon posted:Even with -1/-0 it's way too strong--that effect costs 3U on a blue enchantment where that's all it does. Also, these are all significant upgrades over the banners/obelisks. I've changed the esper version. Its probably still too strong.
|
# ¿ May 22, 2017 20:25 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 16:02 |
|
ungulateman posted:As unintuitive as it sounds, you don't need a full stop at the end of that ability. I guess that's because its part of a keyword?
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2017 16:13 |
|
ZeroCount posted:
Well this is great
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 17:29 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2017 21:42 |
|
mostly i just like the goofy guy i found to put on the card
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2017 15:58 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2017 16:03 |
|
e: changed the last card Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 01:12 on Jun 30, 2017 |
# ¿ Jun 29, 2017 20:13 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2017 18:22 |
|
okay one more
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2017 20:59 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:
o poo poo, better answer this Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 02:54 on Jul 12, 2017 |
# ¿ Jul 12, 2017 01:37 |
|
Oh yeah, for some reason I kept looking for "Tree" in the editor and going wtf updated
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2017 02:54 |
|
Man, ya'll got all the best ideas already
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 01:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2017 13:52 |
|
Lone Goat posted:Could this more easily be read as "If enchanted player would draw a card, instead they draw the second card of their library" or am I missing something? I have no idea. I've never seen text for drawing from anywhere but the top or bottom of the library, so I figured it wasn't supported
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2017 14:42 |
|
Elyv posted:I feel like you could probably draw the second card of your library but even if not, "When Enchanted Player draws a card, instead that player puts the second from the top card of their library into their hand" has 99% of the same functionality I think this is a good change. Thanks for you help!
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2017 21:11 |
|
Not Alex posted:The enchanted player is now immune to being decked. Whelp. Guess I'll stick to the first version! also
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2017 14:23 |
|
manaburn's back baby!
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2017 03:18 |
|
completing the rarity cycle I guess e: powered it up a bit Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 02:23 on Aug 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Aug 25, 2017 20:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2017 23:11 |
|
I should probably drop the "triggered abilities" thing but gently caress it, we're doing weird poo poo
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2017 21:55 |
|
If you're using it as a 5 color mana rock, you're not gonna get very far with it. Its important that it steals EVERY mana ability So you can generate mana without tapping it: Then tap it for alot of mana: While it also gives you free mana: Some mana abilities have beneficial riders: or gently caress it, just go infinite: There's alot of pitfalls tho. Alot of mana abilities refer to the card by its own name, and while we'd copy those abilities, I don't think stuff like this could be used: So it would probably be confusing as hell. I don't have any clue if its actually worth bothering exiling stuff and also killing yourself to get it. E: actually braid of fire isn't a Mana ability, it's a cost! Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 02:58 on Sep 1, 2017 |
# ¿ Sep 1, 2017 02:41 |
|
Thanks for the clarifications, guys. Small update: removed the "twice" clause because it wasn't really needed Also I'm stealing the art from Naked Singularity because it captures what I'm creating and because that card is dumb: Also made a non-insane version: I can't get colorless mana to show up in my editor Apparently I need to download an update but it isn't clear which one I need.. The worst submarine posted:
lol this owns
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2017 20:23 |
|
(it stacks) e: gave it haste Nebalebadingdong fucked around with this message at 20:01 on Sep 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Sep 6, 2017 16:23 |
|
more modal madness
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2017 22:59 |
|
hell yeah this is my kind of contest!
|
# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 16:24 |
|
The worst submarine posted:My entry is here. u fucker!
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 19:56 |
|
ZorajitZorajit posted:Top down designs around this subgenre's tropes are encouraged: pick a mark, assemble a crew, scope the joint, get in and get out, and get away with the loot. - assemble crew - scope the joint - get away with the loot Could a single card encompass an entire heist story?
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2017 22:04 |
|
Dr. Stab posted:So you can cast spells from that hand indefinitely? Also, name a land spell. Hmm, I dont think so. Why would it be indefinite?
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2017 02:39 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 04:47 |
|
Dr. Stab posted:I think the less ambiguous wording "you may cast any number of nonland cards revealed this way" Yeah you're probably right that it could be clearer. Stuff like Talent of the Telepath uses "among them" which is probably what it should be changed to.
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2017 19:23 |