|
Bip Roberts posted:Hillary is a liar but that's not why she's under investigation. She's under investigation because she's Hillary Clinton and republicans will generate a scandal over literally nothing. Look at Benghazi ffs. Hillary Clinton being SoS was literally in charge of Benghazi people and accepted blame. What kind of retarded shill are you?
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 30, 2023 11:34 |
|
|
Mnoba posted:Hillary Clinton being SoS was literally in charge of Benghazi people and accepted blame. What kind of retarded shill are you? i judge her as i would my pet hound, yeh as a bitch!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Frantically destroying all her computers before an impending FBI investigation was just the cool and normal thing to do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
whoa i made up that post as i wrote it. killerr
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
look, democrats will rabidly attack anything to do with george bush jr they are just dumb that way. I mean look at the whole iraq invasion thing!
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:Hillary is a liar but that's not why she's under investigation. She's under investigation because she's Hillary Clinton and republicans will generate a scandal over literally nothing. Look at Benghazi ffs. Hillary 2016: I'm a liar, but so are you Also paging StonetearX2 to the thread for some storytime
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
Mnoba posted:look, democrats will rabidly attack anything to do with george bush jr they are just dumb that way. I mean look at the whole iraq invasion thing! let us nto forget jimmy catre
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
hillary clinton is a liar and arguing either way about it is just dumb the CIA was running the show on the ground because they were up to some iran style "nest of spies" poo poo but no one is pressing them and hillary is taking one on the chin for them which is probably why they endorse her just read weiner's "legacy of ashes: a history of the CIA" and the whole benghazi debacle starts to make sense
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:just read weiner's
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
Mnoba posted:Hillary Clinton being SoS was literally in charge of Benghazi people and accepted blame. What kind of retarded shill are you?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
and gently caress handing anything personal over to the FBI would you trust the loving gov to protect your intimate personal secrets?? WRONG. you know everything the FBI connects to the internet gets compromised because they have been a culture of just hiring accountants and lawyers for decades and now struggle to get IT people because times have changed the conservatives continually deride the public sector for shoddy work but when it comes to clas data they think the gov is the pinnacle of security. if there was clas data on those servers it was in better hands with a private firm
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:08
|
|
Robot Pride posted:and gently caress handing anything personal over to the FBI Yeah let's not pretend like every other politician in DC wouldn't have done the exact same thing.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
taking a brave stance in support of irreperrable systemic corruption itt
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
im sure anyone would have shoved a cigar up fatty ding dongs snatch, it depends what the definition of "is" is
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
HRC hasn't done anything criminal. Is that really so difficult to wrap your head around? Like it's okay you can say she's a bad candidate and drop all the hysterics as well ya know? 
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
"It is entirely excusable for Hillary to not follow protocol because if she had she would have had her politically advantageous position compromised. Simple as that." -Sputtering amoral dweebs itt
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:HRC hasn't done anything criminal. Is that really so difficult to wrap your head around? There's actually many laws she broke that she got a pass on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
giving huma access to her email was criminal in itself being "too big to charge" isn't close to the same thing as not doing anything criminal president trump will have her in front of a jury
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
reallivedinosaur posted:taking a brave stance in support of irreperrable systemic corruption itt because i'm totally sure that every person in america would readily give up their personal data that could include chat transcripts of spousal arguments or sexual pics/talk, embarrassing e-mails from children/other family yeah, man, feel free to hand over your machine with pics of your wife's pussy on it so the lab techs can jack off to them and send them to their friends because i'm sure there would be ZERO chance those poo poo birds would copy them off or leak them you trust the government that much?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:25
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:There's actually many laws she broke that she got a pass on. To be honest I'm more willing to believe the attorney general and the Department of Justice and the FBI and all the other various senate commissions on this than random GBS posters. If there was evidence then she'd be indicted but she wasn't because there obviously did nothing criminal. And I would *absolutely* wipe any data that wasn't being subpoena'd because like was already said screw them having all my personal info that they don't need.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:because i'm totally sure that every person in america would readily give up their personal data that could include chat transcripts of spousal arguments or sexual pics/talk, embarrassing e-mails from children/other family Hey retard private citizens don't have to follow FOIA. People with government jobs are held to a higher standard so maybe don't talk about your pussy farts on official government communications.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:because i'm totally sure that every person in america would readily give up their personal data that could include chat transcripts of spousal arguments or sexual pics/talk, embarrassing e-mails from children/other family If they have a warrant it really doesn't matter if i "trust them" or not. I am legally bound to comply, and if i destroyed evidence I would certainly face new charges for that. I get it, you think certain people should be above the law. Too big to fail and all that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
I like to imagine that these politicians dont even care who gets elected and they like to just sit and rub elbows with one another and laugh while the poors root for their candidate like its a fuckin sports event.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:To be honest I'm more willing to believe the attorney general and the Department of Justice and the FBI and all the other various senate commissions on this than random GBS posters. Why would the Democrat DoJ prosecute their own candidate? Especially when that candidate has promised the current Attorney General that she'd be able to keep her job if aforementioned candidate wins?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:27
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Hey retard private citizens don't have to follow FOIA. People with government jobs are held to a higher standard so maybe don't talk about your pussy farts on official government communications. So then the entire government is corrupt to the point that it doesn't matter who you vote for; if Hillary can blatantly commit crimes and get away scott free like you say then what's the point really?
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Hey retard private citizens don't have to follow FOIA. People with government jobs are held to a higher standard so maybe don't talk about your pussy farts on official government communications. Hillary followed FOIA.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:So then the entire government is corrupt to the point that it doesn't matter who you vote for, because if HRC can blatantly commit crimes and get away scott free like you say then what's the point really? Purge
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:28
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Purge Well... yeah.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:Hillary followed FOIA. She actually didn't turn over all of her work related emails. And she lied under oath about this.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
reallivedinosaur posted:If they have a warrant it really doesn't matter if i "trust them" or not. I am legally bound to comply, and if i destroyed evidence I would certainly face new charges for that. i'm not willfully handing over a private computer to the gov and this has nothing to do with how much money you have or what position you hold. sorry if your spine is so weak you bend over and suck heel on command
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
I don't think deleting work related emails and not turning them over willfully to the government is following FOIA but we're dealing with paint chip eaters from CSPAM so let's go slow
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:i'm not willfully handing over a private computer to the gov and this has nothing to do with how much money you have or what position you hold. lmao at mr anti-government man hillary supporter here if cops show up at your door with a warrant you got no choice but shut up and let your lawyer handle it
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Why would the Democrat DoJ prosecute their own candidate? Especially when that candidate has promised the current Attorney General that she'd be able to keep her job if aforementioned candidate wins? so the gov is corrupt or is it higher moral standard? pick one so i can decide whether or not to give them my computers
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:I don't think deleting work related emails and not turning them over willfully to the government is following FOIA but we're dealing with paint chip eaters from CSPAM so let's go slow lol be more bitchmad
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:i'm not willfully handing over a private computer to the gov and this has nothing to do with how much money you have or what position you hold. Um have you heard about laws? The state has the monopoly on violence. Hope your philosophy winds up working for you
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Um have you heard about laws? The state has the monopoly on violence. Hope your philosophy winds up working for you he's a freeman on the land. a citizen of the seas or whatever
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:lol be more bitchmad Keep lying scum
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:so the gov is corrupt or is it higher moral standard? pick one so i can decide whether or not to give them my computers Well as a society we expect the government and its employees to do things. This is enshrined in law. Some people with advantageous connections (corruption) don't have to follow the law since they'll be insulated from prosecution. Also I guess I should alert the authorities about you. It sounds like your computer is loaded with cp
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Well as a society we expect the government and its employees to do things. This is enshrined in law. Some people with advantageous connections (corruption) don't have to follow the law since they'll be insulated from prosecution. Also I guess I should alert the authorities about you. It sounds like your computer is loaded with cp WOW threat of false report? amazing. we escalated this quick
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 30, 2023 11:34 |
|
|
Robot Pride posted:i'm not willfully handing over a private computer to the gov and this has nothing to do with how much money you have or what position you hold. Secret and Top Secret info has very strict protocols on how its supposed to be transmitted and received, and if 99% of the dipshits in the military understand this then there's no reason why Hillary shouldn't have. For fucks sake you have to do biannual training for all this garbage as a government employee. Guess Hillary really has lost her marbles. Too old for office.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 23:42
|
|