|
TMMadman posted:Hmmmm. I think it should be ##vote Snooze. She keeps pushing people to vote for PMush (including threatening Dick with a vig), but she's not voting for PMush. Hmmm. Maybe.
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 18:57 |
|
|
DickBastardly posted:lurker hate There are at least a couple of things I want to respond to in this, but I'm going to focus on one initially so it doesn't get missed again. Please explain to me, using my words, how I did this. Although I am pro lurker destruction, I have not sought a lurker cuddle this game. And have actively fought against the one example of that that has been put forth.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
Quid, my point - and case - was that PMush took way too long to talk herself into voting BK for it to be a genuine opinion. Her posts as a whole have been hella hedgey and self-conscious. Also, more pertinently, I don't believe her unconfirmed mason claim in a role madness game. Also also you have now called me out separately for making posts that were too long and posts that were too short. Make up your mind. CPig was your daycop real or a CPig Cop Funny Joke?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
Podima posted:CPig was your daycop real or a CPig Cop Funny Joke? I'd think it would be obvious at this point
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
Oh NVM I see he gave up on that. Fool me once...
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
Votefinder is back up btw. Votecount for Day 1   Poison Mushroom (5): Propaganda Machine, BottleKnight (3): Podima, Snooze Cruise (2): TMMadman, Quidthulhu SirSamVimes (1): Asiina, CapitalistPig, Podima (0): Quidthulhu, Quidthulhu (0): TMMadman, fiery_valkyrie (0): SirSamVimes, CapitalistPig (0): Poison Mushroom, BottleKnight, King Burgundy (0): TMMadman, TMMadman (0): King Burgundy, Asiina, Not Voting (2): DickBastardly, fiery_valkyrieWith 13 alive, it's 7 votes to execute. The current deadline is October 12th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 hour, 3 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:I'd think it would be obvious at this point My day vig on the other hand is real and powerful
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:what even is the PMush case? why the hell is she at -1? Did I miss it? People just seem to be voting her? This feels like normal Pmush to me. I'm not seeing her as scum at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:My feeling too. I don't agree with Snooze's case and I don't remember anyone else's reasons (so they can't have been compelling) Have you decided who is scummy yet?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Have you decided who is scummy yet? Fv said in our mason doc you are and i should use my day vig on you
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:Birds of a feather, flock together. Explain how you came to the point that you decided to vote PMush here, please.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
I could see a FV lynch. She has been very non-committal.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Hour until deadline.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:capps also allegedly has a case but i want her to show me what it is rather than just championing the fact that she has taken someone to -1. I don't like the SK call out here. Scum thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:capps also allegedly has a case but i want her to show me what it is rather than just championing the fact that she has taken someone to -1. Quidthulhu posted:I ask because you're laissez-fairing all over the place and don't really seem to care how you look or if the person you dunk is a badman, you seem fairly giddy that you're close to getting someone ded Quidthulhu posted:##vote pbs You can't possibly be serious with this callout/vote.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
mafia edit: lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:Oh whoops lmao Capps, what are you saying is a bad case?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:Fv said in our mason doc you are and i should use my day vig on you Are you claiming you are also a mason?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Podima posted:Capps, what are you saying is a bad case? No she's saying my case is bad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Podima posted:Quid, my point - and case - was that PMush took way too long to talk herself into voting BK for it to be a genuine opinion. Her posts as a whole have been hella hedgey and self-conscious. Also, more pertinently, I don't believe her unconfirmed mason claim in a role madness game. Are you referencing what I just said re: your not reading in context and pulling things out? Because you seem to be ignoring that. e.g. you just skipped over it and jumped on the easy "quid jumping to weird conclusions" posts
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I could see a FV lynch. She has been very non-committal. I just reread her post history and I agree with this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Podima posted:I just reread her post history and I agree with this. Clicked the little question mark again huh Pod???
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I don't like the SK call out here. Scum thing. I highly doubt quid is scum at this point.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I could see a FV lynch. She has been very non-committal. Yup. She's on my list.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
##vote Podima PBS is annoying me by not playing and might still be an uninvolved 3p but Podima is actively misrepresenting things while pretending to be involved and that is scummy as hell
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Are you referencing what I just said re: your not reading in context and pulling things out? Because you seem to be ignoring that. e.g. you just skipped over it and jumped on the easy "quid jumping to weird conclusions" posts I'm responding to this: Quidthulhu posted:Furthermore, the only actual case I am seeing is Podima's, which is a single quote "press the ?" delineation to make a point of how it looks "fake." It's weak, and I don't think it makes sense when you actually put her quotes in context of her and BK responding to each other, starting from where BK discusses his CPig vote: You and I are interpreting the BK/PMush interaction differently, is what it comes down to.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
SSV
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Clicked the little question mark again huh Pod??? Are you for real jumping on me for reading this game? Get over yourself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
Podima posted:You and I are interpreting the BK/PMush interaction differently, is what it comes down to. Are we? In what way? All you've really discussed is that PMush is being fake, but haven't said why, saying "the quotes speak for themselves" basically by just laying them out there with no commentary. Now you are sitting here saying "well we interpreted it differently." I would love to know why you feel that way, since you aren't sharing with the class.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I highly doubt quid is scum at this point. Yeah, I'm leaning town because he said a few things I don't follow, which I associate with Town Quid. But that post bothered me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Podima posted:Are you for real jumping on me for reading this game? Get over yourself. I don't believe you are doing this, no.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
This should say "SSV too" in regards to "not playing the game and that irritating me"
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:I don't believe you are doing this, no. Speaking seriously here - please don't insult me. I don't sign up for games I'm not going to put effort into, and the fact that you're going down this road means you have picked the wrong tunnel target. Why do you think I'm not reading this game? Summarize and point to specifics.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:There are at least a couple of things I want to respond to in this, but I'm going to focus on one initially so it doesn't get missed again. Regarding the post in which I "fish" Pmush, I honestly had an impulsive suspicion that the reason she "had reasons to be really want to get invested in this game" had something to do with a meta-feud with BK for the way I perceived her going after him at the time. But after re-reading a bit, that doesn't make sense since she made statements against voting for meta reasons, which really should've been obvious to me however it didn't occur to me at the time. By the way, this question I posed for her to elaborate had nothing to do with her role so I don't see how that is fishing based on what I assume to be your definition of fishing is. Now, my definition of fishing has a broader scope than of simply ascertaining a player's role, however I can see the flaw in using that term to describe one's questioning of a player for anything more than that so I will probably not throw that term around as loosley moving forward, especially when it has scum shade attached. Simply advocating a style of play is as good as playing it, especially if you can motivate others to play that style. This is in regard to your advocacy of D1 lurkercide. If you could prompt a lurker bandwagon without directly participating in it well... that social engineering at it finest, and what are scum but social engineers? mafia e: I forgot to quote KB for context Dick Bastardly fucked around with this message at 02:14 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:Regarding the post in which I "fish" Pmush, I honestly had an impulsive suspicion that the reason she "had reasons to be really want to get invested in this game" had something to do with a meta-feud with BK for the way I perceived her going after him at the time. But after re-reading a bit, that doesn't make sense since she made statements against voting for meta reasons, which really should've been obvious to me however it didn't occur to me at the time. By the way, this question I posed for her to elaborate had nothing to do with her role so I don't see how that is fishing based on what I assume to be your definition of fishing is. Now, my definition of fishing has a broader scope than of simply ascertaining a player's role, however I can see the flaw in using that term to describe one's questioning of a player for anything more than that so I will probably not throw that term around as loosley moving forward, especially when it has scum shade attached. Who is this post even directed at?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
Podima posted:Speaking seriously here - please don't insult me. I don't sign up for games I'm not going to put effort into, and the fact that you're going down this road means you have picked the wrong tunnel target. I'm not trying to insult you personally, but scum don't read as closely as town, or they fake reads, or they cherry pick stuff to make cases. I am saying you are not reading in a scummy manner. I think this is evidenced by your: -initial case on PMush being cherry picked quotes you say speak for themselves -your dismissal of my callout of that being based on the fact that you read BK/Pmush's interaction differently, although you didn't show that to be the case initially, since your initial case was based purely on PMush's words -your distraction here towards my being tunnelvisioned, insulting, etc. when you could easily just explain what it was you initially saw that doesn't line up with my reading of their back and forth in context. Since you aren't doing that, aren't I to assume here that you weren't reading carefully and DID cherry pick PMush's words to "speak for themselves," and now have no legs to stand on with this case?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I could see a FV lynch. She has been very non-committal. I like that you're feeling things out here, not going out on a limb and actually moving your vote until you feel like you've got some back up. That way when I flip town you don't come off as the ringleader. ##vote TMM
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
Dick don't edit your posts
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:Simply advocating a style of play is as good as playing it, especially if you can motivate others to play that style. This is in regard to your advocacy of D1 lurkercide. If you could prompt a lurker bandwagon without directly participating in it well... that social engineering at it finest, and what are scum but social engineers? hahaha. So to be clear, you are saying that my advocating of a strategy of culling lurkers when you don't have a scummy target, is MORE scummy, then someone actually going after someone they themselves think is a lurker cuddle? Like to be clear here, BK is calling his cuddle of Cpig a lurker cuddle and isn't planning on scum hunting today. That is less scummy? I want to make sure I fully understand your perspective.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 18:57 |
|
|
Podima posted:Explain how you came to the point that you decided to vote PMush here, please. I felt BK and Pmach's cases against were good at the time, and I had major scum vibes for KB so the voting correlation legitimized it in my mind. But Quid made a pretty good case for Pmush's defense, so I re-evaluated my vote. I really don't know what the gently caress is going on now, and probably will no-vote and start anew D2.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:18
|
|