|
ThndrShk2k posted:It's more likely they pre-judged any dissent as the enemy, and thus sexist or racist. Hell this is still happening right now all over social media and other discussions. It's the wrong lesson to learn.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 20:44 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 17:48 |
|
I'd say Anyway the point is just because there isn't any resistance yet you should be ready for what happens as the shock of the election wears off.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 21:29 |
|
Zythrst posted:Please please please ask about DAPL. Agreed.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 21:45 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I mean I guess it's me still being a ~pragmatist~ but I just can't imagine a mindset of 'yea he's basically perfect for the job and has done literally what we need before already...but he did a thing I don't like...' being any less dangerous than the one of 'uh clearly we can learn nothing from this and we just need to repackage Clinton as a cute young black guy to win????' Let him do his fundraising strategy, let him coordinate GOTV, let him run the Primary, don't let him chose the candidates.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 23:02 |
|
etalian posted:Bad dems had their chance, they must be replaced with progressive leadership. I don't feel we need a purity test for who is a "true" progressive for all potential DNC positions.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 23:16 |
|
Al! posted:its actually hidden in a chocolate bar but hillary bought them up and is currently having her remaining staff unwrap them all so she can be the only one who gets one Nice. NumberLast posted:It's not about purity it's about having a comprehensive and consistent platform that you stick to. Heh.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 23:18 |
|
Venom Snake posted:it's either incredibly sad or amazingly uplifting that the left is going to regain control of the democratic party with only very minor resistance. If you went back in time and told yourself that progressives would take control of the DNC with the support of chuck schumer would you believe yourself. Something crazy would have to happen before I believed that, like Hillary losing to Trump or something....
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2016 23:23 |
|
Holy gently caress Jess McIntosh blaming "internalized misogyny" for Hillary's loss. On All In. (sign in required unfortunately :/ ) http://www.msnbc.com/now
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:21 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:
Hey maybe instead of telling them to 'shut the gently caress up' you explain why it's isn't actually the mexicans or the blacks and you run a platform that helps everybody instead of acting like that is some kind of impossible thing. It's not the 30's anymore, we don't have to explicitly exclude minorities for social stimulus.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:26 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:This is a good start, but when even Sanders is talking about 'white working class' the anxiety grows.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:28 |
|
Abrasive Obelisk posted:When is the Keith Ellison interview? I don't think MSNBC is showing it? It was the first one. It's over now. Then was Jess "internalized misogyny" McIntosh.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:33 |
|
Peel posted:the thing is, outside this thread i encounter quite a few poc commentators reporting on and despairing at people jumping on the 'white working class appeal' bandwagon at the concrete expense of anti-racism. i think this thread is pretty good, but sometimes i get that sort of feeling, and there's no guarantee it won't slip over time as people tunnel-vision on the thing we want to actively change, which is class politics. or maybe they're all overreacting, but 'ignore what i see members of group x being concerned about' doesn't seem like a good start in not ignoring the concerns of group x I'm sorry that hot takes don't have enough nuance for you. The deeply flawed hillary campaign used anti-racism as a shield for status-quo neoliberalism. Not only that, but she explicitly dismissed free college, by asking if it would solve racism, or sexism!!! WTF!!!! How can you possibly defend that? Peel posted:this is a fair question. i don't know if there there was a strategic mistake re racism, but the potential mistake going forward would be to not concentrate efforts on fighting the barrel-load of racism likely to come down the pipe from the trump admin and gop congress, leading to minority disengagement (base disillusioned from their concerns being ignored you might say) and also minorities just plain not voting because gop governments won't let them As for this, Blame Clinton for the latter, but the former will be in the new DNC platform once Ellison and people like him remove the reigns from people who have no intention of addressing wealth inequality, and worse, use racism as an excuse for never doing it. ate shit on live tv has issued a correction as of 02:42 on Nov 15, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:40 |
|
Peel posted:this is the part of dem autopsy racechat where someone assumes anyone trying to highlight race is a clintonite shill out to undermine the revolution, which is exactly the defensive reflex that will lead people to actually ignore race No one is ignoring race. We just want economic policies that transcend race, not that are racist. I know it seems impossible, but maybe lets try or at least let's not use the fact that raising the minimum wage won't solve racism as a strike against raising the minimum wage? Is that possible?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 02:58 |
|
Venom Snake posted:powercrazy was 100% correct and you should never forget it.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:00 |
|
Lastgirl posted:criticism of a female's policy as "rape" ?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:08 |
|
jackofarcades posted:You know, there's nothing wrong with criticizing free college as not going far enough. I mean blatantly trying to judo it like Hillary did was dumb, but we can critique it. I don't think the problem of Clinton's platform was that it went to far, and Hillary had no intention of critiquing it in that way because she wasn't planning on incorporating any of it until Bernie forced her to. I mean sure, if you ask me Bernie's platform didn't go far enough, but who in the Clinton camp was doing that?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:12 |
|
jackofarcades posted:Your last point is big. A lot of Dems are reluctant to criticize some of these Dem controlled govts. The problem is that those with power protect the machine, even when it's Dem-controlled. People gotta put those govts on notice... but, like, people in Ferguson just don't vote a lot. Dems really need to rally these voters too. Law Enforcement is a huge issue that even Bernie isn't strong enough on. The most you see from various parties is deification of cops, never will you see the word "accountability." You'll see "training" as if the police possess some sort of childlike innocence, and just gosh darn it, don't realize they aren't supposed to kill people. You'll see plenty of condemnation of "cop killers" as if that is a thing that happens with any regularity. You'll hear about the pressures of the job and that's way they kill over 1000 people a year, most under dubious circumstances, and finally you''ll see them referred to as "only human" as if them randomly killing people is just an unsolvable problem part of the human condition. It's all poo poo and is a perfect example of something where racism certainly contributes but is hardly the cause-in-fact.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:22 |
|
Peel posted:i'm a british socialist here because it's interesting, important and akin to recent events in my country (the price of being a metropole is foreigners butting in). i paid little attention to the clinton campaign because it was a generic left-neoliberal operation of no special interest. i believe in democratic control of the means of production and consider increasing inequality a perilous threat to humanity in the longer term. i've said nothing whatsoever to suggest an affinity for neoliberalism besides thinking that anti-racist politics are important and powercrazy is accusing me of opposing a raise in the minimum wage, for some reason I'm referring to the neo-liberal aspects of clinton's platform. I'm bringing them up as an example of what not to do. Throughout the general election Clinton offered feel-good messages with not substance. "Love Trumps Hate" I loving terrible slogan since it has Trump's name right in the middle of it. But other then how bad the campaign was at it, I have not thing against positive messaging. But if that is all you have? That's a huge problem! You can't eat good-feelings and when the last 8 years have destroyed your family, you need something for that, Hillary had nothing.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:28 |
|
etalian posted:Trump supporters attacked the cast of SV at a LA bar and got thrown out lol
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:40 |
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Has this thread already discussed how Dems may look dumb if they condemn people who voted for Trump as monsters after they ran a candidate that voted for a terrible war? The most important part of the autopsy thread is the DNC needs self-awareness. Not "Wokeness," not "memes" but self-reflection. Why was a New York senator, the candidate of Wall St, supposed to be the savior of the party of the people?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:42 |
|
iospace posted:Maddow about to have a new DNC Chair candidate on. Boom. Bernie Sanders out of no where.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:44 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:so who was the dark horse DNC chair candidate supposedly announcing on maddow tonight Jaime Harrison.... yea. Maddow has been such poo poo for so long now. Oh well, she was pretty good in 2012 I guess.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:49 |
|
Zythrst posted:Want to make bets if he gets asked about it? Too depressing.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:52 |
|
Zythrst posted:OH poo poo! This is SOFT BALL with Rachel Maddow!
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 03:56 |
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Identity politics is a dumb phrase that apparently includes Marxism at this point since that focuses on people's identity as workers or capitalists. Identity Politics is a Privileged Distraction.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 04:43 |
|
theHUNGERian posted:Sorry for the day crew question, but given that none of the news outlets I follow predicted this outcome, I am worried that I live in an echo chamber. What news outlet(s) should I be following to get the most balanced news coverage? Laughing in my face while saying "they all suck" is an acceptable answer. Don't look for Pundit's "hot takes." Look for interviews, and polls. Basically primary sources. For example, what does Jaime Harrison say about his odorous relation with the Podesta Group? Well lets watch Rachel Maddow because she has him on. "It's to feed the kids." Welp at least we know.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 04:52 |
|
Beachcomber posted:Helpful/hurtful?: posters and billboards reading "what class are you?" That's the secret. "It could be worse therefore I shouldn't complain." is the message.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 04:58 |
|
Neeksy posted:Since Trump has to fill more than 2000 staffing positions in a few months and considering his ability to vet anybody, should leftists start applying for jobs there in droves to either overwhelm the system or become intentionally-useless employees? Apply for policy positions and try to do good
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 01:02 |
|
Battle Royale Baby posted:What about grabbing dick? Is trump equal opportunity? Gotta grab something.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 01:10 |
|
Lastgirl posted:Unfortunately it's the insane conspiracy theorists that are equipped with ARs and bunkers and can hole out for weeks. Well if racists didn't get upset when the Black Panther's were marching around Washington, then the police wouldn't be the only ones.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 01:34 |
|
Lastgirl posted:That is true. Well you could hang out in your coastal city living room with military grade hardware during the 2nd civil war any still watch HBOGO
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 01:43 |
|
It's super important to me that only the "right kind of people" are able to have rights. By the way Hillary Clinton is the future of this party, I'm so Woke.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 16:16 |
|
Thoguh posted:Also this probably won't be popular here but I think it would be a bad idea for progressives to make blanket amnesty for undocumented immigrants a big platform plank. Better to focus on things like reforming the immigration process and going after businesses that hire illegals. Absolutely agreed. You can humanize while enforcing current immigration policies, but punish businesses that actually cause the racial strife. It's not the fruitpickers who ate the problem, it's the agribusiness who offers $1 an hour and then complains that no one except desperate immigrants wants to do the work. Also stop underpaying h1bs.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 16:23 |
|
Maddox isn't an MRA guy nor is he racist or whatever otherizing term hills shills use for people they don't like.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 16:31 |
|
loquacius posted:I can't think of any specific examples for my argument because there's no way I'm going to Maddox's website as an adult over the age of 17 so I'm working off decade-old memories Same. He had a funny video like 12 years ago talking about how big his balls are, but I don't see how some childish jokes about genitalia make him an MRA. Anyway, maybe he is now, I don't know, but calling everyone you don't like an MRA is intellectually bankrupt.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:00 |
|
Battle Royale Baby posted:It’s about a group of people who routinely prize their privilege above ALL else. Period. We don’t get those voters. We don’t want to get those voters. We turn out our base and we don’t even have to worry about this. Agreed, Fortunately that group of privileged third-way dems has been booted, no need to bring them back, nor anyone associated with them nor any of their ideals.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:04 |
|
Al! posted:ahh hell lets give him another chance, whadda you say? Hes been doing a pretty good job so far with the dems Lol if you think Schumer is worried about anything.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:32 |
|
Battle Royale Baby posted:I’m just mad as hell to see Bernie bros. cynically losing this lost to try to once again steer us to their hopeless utopia. I’m not about that life. No, we are not going to back of the bus because you desire most of what Trump does only you desire it from the left. Take that poo poo and walk. It ain’t right and it sure as hell ain’t progressive. lol
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:35 |
|
enraged_camel posted:Just like those who think social issues are just a distraction are socially privileged. No one thinks this though.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:48 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 17:48 |
|
bump_fn posted:im a big dumb idiot why is free college racist It's not and I'm not going to attempt to understand the twisted logic that people had when they were calling Bernie's policies and his supporters racist.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:54 |