Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I will play this mafs

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


So is there any reason at all not to mass claim

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Quidthulhu posted:

But in all seriousness this should probably be like, a claimless game.

##vote quid

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Our goal is to hunt scum and you seem to be against a very effective means of scumhunting. I honestly don't think it'll break the game though.

Consider this. The game has 17 players. There are 7 anti-town players (consolidating the scum and 3p). If a mass claim occurs, that means only three players will get confirmed town status.

I still really don't like the fact that you're just using being nice to the mod as an excuse to avoid a strategy that "breaks the game" though.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Why not

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Jonathan Fisk posted:

You get 3 confirmed guaranteed and then the rest of the scum team and 3ps have to consciously not choose the same roles

I'm not saying it isn't a strong tactic, I still want to do it. I'm just saying it probably doesn't break the game.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


man, reducing the pool of lynchable candidates from 17 to 14 sure makes the game no longer mafia. the integrity of the game would be completely ruined

I'm the Citizen btw.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


In what way is there no point for you to play the game?

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Tbh that feels kinda fake. Even if your power was completely negated, you can still play mafia and at this point there's enough resistance to the mass claim idea that there wasn't that much pressure for you to claim if you're so against it. Leaving my vote where it is.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Quidthulhu posted:

I'm saying that your strategy is against the spirit of Mafia, a real dick move to the mod, and that makes for an unfun game, which you have also doubly ruined because nobody is going to visit me at night now. There is no point for me to play.

I think you're vastly overestimating the level to which this breaks the game.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


come @ me

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


The fact that there's no counterclaim this close to the lynch is making me cool on Quid. ##unvote

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I like juicy info

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Moatillata posted:

Who visited tobacco

Don't answer this question, seriously.

##vote Moatillata

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Moatillata posted:

Okay so we didn't mass claim so we could play night action mafia but no one wants to talk aboit results so I am just gonna go j/o in a microwaved watermelon

I wanted a mass claim, but that only works if everyone claims. Trying to get him to out the probable doctor is an incredibly scummy thing.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Moatillata posted:

Why would the doc protect the jailer of all people

Because he claimed and asked for protection and is a powerful role?

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


GulagDolls posted:

is your reason for voting him because he asked that

Yes, there is no town reason for pushing him to reveal who visited.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


So this is what I've got so far, correct me if I've missed anything?

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


list updated

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Why is my vote still listed on Moat?
##unvote

##vote tpink seems as good a target as any

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


##vote omg

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I mean it's not won yet, it's very possible that some of the unclaimed people are town and scum/3p beat them to claims.

Not probable, but possible. Anyways, I'm going to bed.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


The I'd rather ##vote Gulag

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Drunk Nerds posted:

##vote dralexandertobacco

Are you ever going to say why you're so certain that Tobacco is the kidnapper?

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


oh that's right, drunk nerds is dead isn't he

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I woke up an hour ago. :saddowns:

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


##chaoslord non-claimers die

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Dunno why people are saying citizen isn't out, its me and I claimed ages ago.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I'd like to knock out confirmed badguy Gulag.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


##vote gulagdolls

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Hey stckup, three things.

1. Why did you vote me over someone who hasn't even claimed yet?

2. Moat is the Marshall so I really doubt you were jailed by him. Either whoever jailed you is dumb or your lie is dumb.

3. If you're the vig, why didn't you speak up when tpink claimed the cop kill?

Something doesn't add up here.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


got some chores tonight posted:

oh ##vote sirsamvimes thats my role

Well that narrows this down. ##vote chores

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Chores stick-up scumteam ggwp

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Moatillata posted:

Ssv why didn't you vote stickup? You better not be impersonating me I have lawyers on retainer

Because from my perspective, chores is 100% confirmed scum.

tpink posted:

That's right. We already have a bunch of votes on stick-up, though, so we should get that done first, and then chores is next.

This post made me start to doubt myself. You're acting like two votes is a large amount of momentum that's difficult to move, and you seem kind of desperate to get stickup hanged.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


tpink posted:

I thought there were 3 votes on stickup, not 2 - my bad. I am not desperate to get stickup hanged; I am also happy to vote chores (the other remaining scum), since at this point I think the town victory is pretty much assured and it's just a matter of rolling up the remaining scum.

Victory assured? We're at MYLO, aren't we?

Hang wrong target, scum kills someone, and then we're at four alive with two scum. Scum wins.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Also, see Quid? Mass claiming was a strong tactic, but it didn't break the game. :v:

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


I agree, let's vote chores.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


Moatillata posted:

So you and stickup are the scum team then ssv?

Jeez

No, I'm just unsure whether stickup or tpink is scum but I know chores is scum.

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


why would I, as scum, start the push for mass claiming in the first place

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SirSamVimes
Jul 21, 2008

~* Challenge *~


this is a stickup posted:

no lynch in like 5 minutes, did no one even bother to show up?

you showed up and for some reason did not vote for moat

  • Locked thread