|
sorry, did not vote for chores I mean
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
##vote chores seriously can we hang this scumbo already
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
tpink posted:lmao, I cannot loving believe we no-lynched. Way to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory. I love it when people don't join in the vote then complain about no-lynching.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
tpink posted:Scum didn't kill me last night because I would have flipped town, thereby confirming that stick is scum. We should have voted stick yesterday, like I said. Good lord this is stupid. They killed Moatillata because he is confirmed town and the main dispute in this game right now is whether you or stickup is scum, it was the obvious target regardless of which one of you it is.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
tpink posted:What are you talking about? I voted stick. Why didn't you vote chores?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
You are either scum or really bad at this game.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
DrAlexanderTobacco posted:apologies for not posting much yesterday (or indeed voting), timezones really synced up badly this time around. I'm pretty sure Tpink is scum. The only possible reason for your action to fail against Stickup is if he were jailed. If you were jailed, you would have been notified about it because of the communication aspect and they have no other form of roleblocking. And if one scum member was jailing the other, it wouldn't have been possible for there to be a NK. ##vote tpink
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
DrAlexanderTobacco posted:Roleblocking and protecting is mentioned but scumteam kills? Eager to have clarification from tobbs maybe. Roleblocking has always included scum kills. If this game had an exception it would be weird and dumb and also make the Escort role incredibly anti-town.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
This game is solved, tpink/chores are the scumteam.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Also yes holy poo poo unvote while you're unsure about the mechanics so he doesn't get scumrushed
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
have you not even used your one shot kill rofl
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
tpink posted:Seriously, how are people reading stick's ridiculous posts from yesterday (where he claimed he didn't know that I had claimed vig, that he didn't know that I voted for him, and that he didn't even read all my posts before deciding I was scum) and go "hmm ok that's town." How do you explain Tobacco's jail attempt on stick up failing? Sorry, this game is solved.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
the ironic part is if their kidnapper did not take an action, this game would not be solved
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
or if the kidnapper did the kill
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
So tpink, how angry are you that chores wasn't here to scumrush the vote with you?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
Scum roles: Kidnapper, Rolecop. Living town roles: Jailor, Citizen, Vigilante. Claims Citizen: SSV, Chores Veteran: tpink, stickup Jailor: Tobacco So Tobacco is confirmed town Jailor. He attempted to jail stickup, but failed. Seeing as there's no other form of roleblock, that means that stickup was already jailed. If the Kidnapper jailed stickup, stickup is confirmed town because if the kidnapper jailed his own scumbro no kill would have happened. Just self-vote, this game is done.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
Tobacco would have been notified of a kidnap because kidnapping allows communication between the kidnapper and kidnapee. Tobbs even mentioned that he creates docs for them, so the target would need to be notified that a doc exists. Sorry, your explanation doesn't work. It's impossible for you to not be scum.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
I mean I'm kinda impressed at how you're holding out in the face of overwhelming evidence.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
DrAlexanderTobacco posted:I'm swaying from left to right on your arguments here TIAS is railroading because they're sharing a claim so to each of them, the other is the only real target. I'm railroading because with your claim, there's no possible way for him to be town. The only defense he offers is "I don't know how the action failed" because he knows there's no other explanation.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Seriously.SirSamVimes posted:Scum roles: Kidnapper, Rolecop. There is no other way things could have happened.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 01:21
|
|
|
Chores is only dead set on me because he's sharing my claim.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
A compelling argument dongsbutt
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
okay can you explain to me how the hell tpink isn't scum when the night actions make it impossible
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
because if dongsbot did the night kill and jailed, I'm gonna be mad about this game
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
I don't get it. If you roleblock someone, your action succeeded. If your action failed, that should mean the target didn't get roleblocked. Listing it as a mutual fail seems like a weird way of handling it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:
Because for some reason people considered his claim valid and when I tried to push his lynch it resulted in a no lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 03:37
|
|
how did town lose this? How was chores not the one voted out?
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
chaoslord posted:You also could have voted the scum chores He did, but tpink and tobacco didn't. For some reason the last person to throw out a halfhearted claim was given the same level of consideration as the first person to claim.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 04:10
|
|
