|
the last couple pages of this thread are the first time I've seen anyone on this board express any kind of opinion on dewey foley or heard mention of any angle he came up with, this whole thing falls apart when you start suggesting curtis axel signs were confiscated because 1) nobody has ever brought a curtis axel sign to a live event and 2) wwe would never listen to pitches for getting curtis axel over fwiw it's my understanding he's not a full on writer and merely an assistant
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:36 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 01:55 |
|
Dewey Foley? No, but you can!!!!!!
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:38 |
|
Alain Post posted:big dave has repeatedly mentioned that the idea is to use the CW matches on RAW to set up payoffs on the network On one hand, the only people who will see the CWs do good stuff are people who pay for the network, which is a very small fraction of the WWE audience. If most of the good stuff is happening on the network, people will continue to not give a gently caress about them on Raw because they won't be doing their cool flippy poo poo there. It could also hurt the division since the shows are going on after SD's main event, so a lot of the audience will probably leave instead of watching. On the other hand, if the CWs start doing impressive stuff on Raw and make you want to see more, maybe you'll pay for the network if you aren't already. It's also probably cheap to put together, since they are already using the arena for SD Live.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:38 |
|
the chains are off
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:38 |
|
I Believe in Dewey Foley
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:40 |
|
oatgan posted:and 2) wwe would never listen to pitches for getting curtis axel over does HHH still like him
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:40 |
|
Alain Post posted:does HHH still like him Hippos like birds but they're still gonna eat em. I think. I'm not a zoologist rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:42 |
|
oatgan posted:the last couple pages of this thread are the first time I've seen anyone on this board express any kind of opinion on dewey foley or heard mention of any angle he came up with, this whole thing falls apart when you start suggesting curtis axel signs were confiscated because 1) nobody has ever brought a curtis axel sign to a live event and 2) wwe would never listen to pitches for getting curtis axel over mick foley has said writer's assistant every time i've ever heard/read him talk about it, which probably means he does secretary-type stuff for a writer, jots things down at meetings and maybe gets to feed his writer ideas every once in awhile
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:45 |
|
Vaguido posted:On one hand, the only people who will see the CWs do good stuff are people who pay for the network, which is a very small fraction of the WWE audience. If most of the good stuff is happening on the network, people will continue to not give a gently caress about them on Raw because they won't be doing their cool flippy poo poo there. It could also hurt the division since the shows are going on after SD's main event, so a lot of the audience will probably leave instead of watching. On the other other hand, the likelihood is pretty strong that the crowd who stays to watch the cruisers might be smarky which...bodes well I guess?
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:46 |
|
This is all covered in the documentary Foley Knows Best.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:46 |
|
Alain Post posted:does HHH still like him
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:54 |
|
oatgan posted:the chains are off It turns out, the chains were inside him all along.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 18:58 |
|
That DICK! posted:Hippos like birds but they're still gonna eat em. I think. I'm not a zoologist rear end in a top hat what kind of rear end in a top hat are you?
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:03 |
|
oatgan posted:the last couple pages of this thread are the first time I've seen anyone on this board express any kind of opinion on dewey foley or heard mention of any angle he came up with, this whole thing falls apart when you start suggesting curtis axel signs were confiscated because 1) nobody has ever brought a curtis axel sign to a live event and 2) wwe would never listen to pitches for getting curtis axel over When I went to the Christmas raw here in Minneapolis a couple years back there was a giant We Heart Axel banner draped over one of the balconies.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:14 |
|
Dimebags Brain posted:When I went to the Christmas raw here in Minneapolis a couple years back there was a giant We Heart Axel banner draped over one of the balconies. Hometowns don't count
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:20 |
|
looking at Dewey Foley, he probably makes a mean steak & ketchup wrap which is probably why he's on payroll
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:42 |
|
Alain Post posted:I still don't understand how giving them an additional hour of WWE programming is the worst burial in the history of wrestling
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:49 |
|
IcePhoenix posted:Hometowns don't count But wasn't that where this sign confiscating thing happened?
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 19:58 |
|
sportsgenius86 posted:looking at Dewey Foley, he probably makes a mean steak & ketchup wrap which is probably why he's on payroll He's Stephanie's chaiwallah when Mick isn't around. It's the family business.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:14 |
|
Vaguido posted:On one hand, the only people who will see the CWs do good stuff are people who pay for the network, which is a very small fraction of the WWE audience. Dude it's like half the weekly tv viewers at this point.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:23 |
|
Curtis axel is an extremely good worker and almost as safe as Heath Slater. Guy is going to be around for awhile if only for those qualities. I'm sure he'll end up a coach at some point.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:40 |
|
Dilbert Fanclub President posted:Dude it's like half the weekly tv viewers at this point. Assuming all of the subscribers actually watch the content, which is unlikely.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:42 |
|
imagine not caring about akira tozawa, one of the top 5 wrestlers in the world
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:45 |
|
i have the network and i've never watched anything on it that wasn't a pay per view because holy christ, how can you want more WWE than the 26 hours a month you already get through TV and PPV
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:45 |
|
Efexeye posted:i have the network and i've never watched anything on it that wasn't a pay per view because holy christ, how can you want more WWE than the 26 hours a month you already get through TV and PPV if u don't watch raw it's hella easy
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:47 |
|
Alain Post posted:I still don't understand how giving them an additional hour of WWE programming is the worst burial in the history of wrestling WWE already had 3 hours to get cruiserweights over (on a non PPV week). If they couldn't do it in three, why should people believe the fourth will help in any way that isn't just padding Efexeye posted:i have the network and i've never watched anything on it that wasn't a pay per view because holy christ, how can you want more WWE than the 26 hours a month you already get through TV and PPV Basically 8 to 11 (or even 13 on the rare Takeover+WWE PPV weeks) hours a week. At some point, you're oversaturating the product thinking it's helping
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:49 |
|
Rhonne posted:But wasn't that where this sign confiscating thing happened? Yep. A few people tweeted about it and Axel replied to them which is probably the extent of what you can do to make that angle work. So naturally it was dropped
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:50 |
|
Ostentatious posted:if u don't watch raw it's hella easy This. I barely watch the weekly tv's anymore. With a ppv every 2 weeks, it's pretty easy to just watch the specials. If you actively avoided the CWC you hosed up.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 20:58 |
|
Talking Smack is special.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:03 |
|
Ostentatious posted:imagine not caring about akira tozawa, one of the top 5 wrestlers in the world Pretty smart of WWE to hide my favorite wrestler behind a $10 paywall.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:04 |
|
i watched camp wwe
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:05 |
|
I'd rather watch Swerved, the E&C show, Ride Along, Table for 3, etc than any given hour of Raw/Smackdown. Also Talking Smack whenever Miz/Alexa/Harper isn't on it.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:06 |
|
I am glad the Curtis Axel sign story is "real" and i hope someone asks "D. Foley" about it in an interview one day
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:07 |
|
MotU posted:i watched camp wwe it was enjoyable, better than most of the shows on the network
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:13 |
|
I liked it when Beta Bitch Bray Wyatt was too much of a weenie to take Nikki Bella (the hottest of the campers) to the dance
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:17 |
|
Alain Post posted:I mean they can change this, because they can change everything, but I still don't understand how giving them an additional hour of WWE programming is the worst burial in the history of wrestling LEt me break it down for you: 1) Raw is 3 hours and needs to be 2. 2) Braun Strowman 3) "Loserweights" 4) Sasha is bad and / or balding 5) James Ellsworth is killing the business 6) Nobody ever got over by being given dedicated screen time
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:21 |
|
Efexeye posted:i have the network and i've never watched anything on it that wasn't a pay per view because holy christ, how can you want more WWE than the 26 hours a month you already get through TV and PPV Reminded me of this: quote:On episode 86 of Sam Roberts' Wrestling Podcast, actor and former WWE writer Freddie Prinze, Jr. talked about his time working alongside WWE's Chairman, Vince McMahon. Prinze suggested that McMahon knows very little about popular culture and entertainment beyond his own professional wrestling empire.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:24 |
|
Basic Chunnel posted:2) Braun Strowman the MOOOOOUNTAIN OF A MAN
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:38 |
|
I do rather like the idea of Vince settling down in the evening for his 500th viewing of Wrestlemania 3.
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 01:55 |
|
Vince is right, WWE has it all and you can have it all too for only $9.99 a month
|
# ? Nov 28, 2016 21:39 |