|
Naked Bear posted:Don't get me wrong, I'm sure everybody here knows that crazy guy who did the thing that time.. it happens, yes. My point is that it's not a common occurrence, and, not to discount your own personal experiences, anecdotes are just that. And as you pointed out, the concealed carry requires an O-5 to sign off on it. Personal experience and completely anecdotal but I've never met anyone who could get their O-3 to sign off on storing personal weapons in the company arms room, so I highly doubt that an O-5 will allow a bunch of retard enlisted to carry on base. Plus, as soon as some rear end in a top hat does and inevitably shoots his battle buddy you just know that garrison commanders will ban concealed carry.
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:17 |
|
|
Justin Tyme posted:What was the reason behind that? I feel like the commander being a dick about storing weapons in the arms room (which would show a lot of prudence/rear end-covering on his part, legally speaking) for no good reason would be like if the commander for some reason banned the practice of Judaism in the barracks. gently caress, dude, I don't know what the reasons were, nor did I care because my gun was at my parents. If there was an actual reason beyond gently caress Joe I would be quite surprised. For reference that was while I was in first brigade at the 82nd. My understanding in Italy was you just didn't own guns over there.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
Steezo posted:risk averse cowardice that isn't borderline, but actual treason that should be punished by death. Pretty accurate description of the military right there
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2016 18:29
|
|