|
So, with a new thread, does that mean we get a new stimpire?
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 05:04 |
|
|
Sunswipe posted:The romance in Alpha Protocol with SIE is perfect. It smells like cat piss and tuna! 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Change "Star Citizen" to "Chris Roberts career" and you've got it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
Daztek posted:Where is MoMA, I need someone to tell me everything will be okay Don't worry commando, everything is okay. Right now.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:
loving game development, how does it work???
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 12:50
|
|
|
Why offload it? If CIG collapses, the .jpgs will be priceless collectors items. The value will go up uP UP
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 13:47
|
|
|
Random citizen, January 2020 posted:So yes, it didn't turn out the way I would have wanted it to - but the implications of Star Citizen's ceased development are much less important than the fact that it was attempted in the first place. With hindsight, it might be easy to proclaim its goals to be impossible, but the fact that the destination wasn't reached does not imply the journey was in vain. I'm proud to have been a (small but loyal and sincere) part of Star Citizen's history, and I wouldn't trade my part of it for any amount of money - the dollars I can (very easily) replenish, the experience is unique. This is a real quote from a real citizen, right?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
Welp, I guess I was fooled. Sad trombone
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
I mostly hope they don't vanish. I honestly think some of those people need to see their failures in the eyes and be forced to learn from them. Some will be smart and get out and get a refund. Others will chalk it up to a learning experience, a very expensive learning experience. Others still will blame Derek Smart and his legion of goons/alts for spreading FUD, and refund cascade, etc. etc.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I was what notorious closed game development studio Harebrained Schemes is working on with their limited scope game development? In defense of HBS (not that they need it), they have actually released several games in the last couple of years, unlike Clown Imperium Gunk.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Very likely imo, but not quite yet Oh well, quote development takes time, I guess we'll just have to be patient and wait.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
intardnation posted:I am out - thanks moma for all the help! Good job, commando o4
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
Tokamak posted:Today's patch doesn't have any of the missing features, and introduced a couple of game breaking bugs. Patching succesfl
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 12:39
|
|
|
So here is a little musing: Do you think the staggering incompetence displayed by CIG is intentional? A filtering process, like in those Nigerian scam emails, where it is suuuuuper obvious that it is a scam, and therefore anyone, even the dumbest, would immediately discard it. But the people that fall for it are so dumb, they're never going to catch on, and as such is a "safe bet" when it comes to giving money to shady people. With star citizen, the game is so badly made, and has been for so long, nobody in their right mind would look at it and say "yes, this looks good. This is up to 2016 standards" So is it a filtering process that attracts only the most broken stupid people, and then milks them for everything they have?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 13:29
|
|
|
orcane posted:I'm dying... He's not wrong. He just forgot to mention it was done by someone else than CIG.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 14:42
|
|
|
orcane posted:I like deluded people on the internet, they're funny. Me too. And the best part: there's an infinite supply of them. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 15:06
|
|
|
A Neurotic Corncob posted:SC Product Lifecycle chart has been updated Star Citizen 1.0? Surely you mean 3.0
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I want to see SQ42 drop in its entirety next year (2017) and real progress made with the (star)systems. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
 That's him in the Lumberyard.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
It's ok, he wasn't actually Alpharius.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Posting on page 42, woohoo! edit: god dammit too slow! Slow_Moe fucked around with this message at 23:59 on Jan 15, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Trilobite posted:Google Translate is a harsh mistress. Every time they receive money they expand the scope, driving people to give them more money. An ouroboros of greed and stupidity.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
Was this made with google translate? I need to know because of a joke in the buttcoin thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 14:10
|
|
|
MeLKoR posted:I was inspired by it. I wonder what the overlap is between Smarties and Buttcoiners, at least as big as the one between Whales and Bitcoiners I suspect. I suspect there is some correlation. After all, a movement of idiots will attract a movement of people willing to laugh at their idiocy. This is good for star citizen because edit: here is my tax you snowflakes. 
Slow_Moe fucked around with this message at 15:07 on Jan 16, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
I think you can turn off loot anims in FC4. There is an option for it somewhere.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:Excuse me if I don't take your word on what is and isn't funny. Hello commando, how much have you spent on this joke so far?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:Ask your dad. gently caress you dad, you're not even my real mom!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
Maybe I'm just being sceptic, but I very much doubt that will happen. taxxe: 
Slow_Moe fucked around with this message at 17:38 on Jan 16, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:To quote : An Ouroboros of bad desing decision and Greed. Well, You're not wrong, but have you considered that to launch on consoles you need an actual legit working product, and not just ~dreams~? SQ42 is as likely on consoles as it is on PC. Also, I used the word legit.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:Thats why i want them to do it. Oh I'd love that too, it would be a slapstick comedy of errors. But more likely, they're going to announce a console version, and probably follow it up with some pre order bullshit or other wonderful opportunity to give CIG more money. And that'll be the end of it. And the whales will shove more money into the garbage fire.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
MeLKoR posted:CIG can release whatever piece of poo poo MVP they want on the PC and there is nothing the whales can do, not so in the consoles. Someone in a publisher is going to have to put his name in the delivery voucher. I doubt they'd be tricked with another Pupil to Planet movie. The likelihood of a release is still zero. On all platforms. 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Foo Diddley posted:I think Chris said that SQ42 would sell at least five million copies, on top of all the copies that have been preordered already Well, if Chris said it, then it must be true.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
I don't understand reddit, and their scrutiny of your posting history. Why is it so important to submit yourself to the neck bearded inquisition? They could learn a lot from 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Chalks posted:I wonder what the backer reaction will be when the saviour of pc gaming confirms that they're spending backer funds on a console port? Obviously they'll lie about it not compromising the fidelity of the game and say that it won't delay anything but what percentage of the backers will buy that and for how many will it be the final straw? They're going to be very salty. SC being PC exclusive puts them in an elevated position where they can lord over all the console peasants and filthy casuals. With a console release, or at least announcement, that unique privilege is taken away.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
Madcosby posted:Just curious, how would people in thjs thread rate derek smarts games? Everything I've seen of them suggest that they're crap. So I won't play them. But that means I can't ever give a good answer, not having first hand knowledge. Make what you will of that.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
REFUNDS!? YOU GAVE THEM REFUNDS!? \ 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
I don't think these dimwits understand why watermarks are a thing. What a surprise.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
Irony, thy name is fuckwit.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Baxta posted:I gotta ask. I googled but it didnt help. Idiots are fooled by big words that sound technical. This helps establish authority, and thus helps scam idiots.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 05:04 |
|
|
trucutru posted:Chris Roberts said here is a sweet ambush point. Over a decade ago I played FEAR and I had some memorable encounters. Like killing most of a group of soldiers, and listening to their leader telling the last man to go attack me. He responded with "gently caress you, Sir!" or something in that line. That was memorable. Meanwhile, in Star Citizen, a commando clips through a floor and the game crashes. Memorable, but in another way.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2017 12:38
|
|