|
Periphery posted:Also, people use the word 'oval office' in a derogatory manner way too much in this thread. It's ok. Be as Australian as you all want to be. It's your thread.
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 04:31 |
|
|
BrigadierSensible posted:Edit: and seconding the Johnson stuff. He always seemed like he was forcing his "Grr I'm a a tough bully" act.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
Schofield wants a longer holiday apparently
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:According to Crash Craddock Johnson was a nice guy that came from an extended family on his mother's side of entitled, money begging turboassholes and he struggled with it for a long time People who use rear end rather than arse; first cunts up against the wall 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
With this stat do they count out of bounds kicks from set shots and kicks clearly intended for a goal?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
snoremac posted:With this stat do they count out of bounds kicks from set shots and kicks clearly intended for a goal? No idea. That would make sense and at the very least I'd assume it counts oob shots. The kicks that don't make the distance might be a bit too much of a gray area but  .E: I would love to see what the difference to the Saints win:loss and % would be if they kicked at league average.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
That's even worse that Joe Daniher
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 09:09
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:That's even worse that Joe Daniher The crazy thing about Daniher is that since he had that 1 goal 6 game in round 6 he's kicked 22.4. If he can turn it around so drastically then I have hope that anyone can. Of course, the Saints are pretty good when it comes to being bad at things so I don't have much hope.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 09:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/laurena_wood/status/879616315203256322
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 09:28
|
|
|
To add: https://twitter.com/LaurenA_Wood/status/879616662370099200 https://twitter.com/LaurenA_Wood/status/879623004732313600 https://twitter.com/LaurenA_Wood/status/879623137351958528
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 09:52
|
|
|
What does this mean for Tony Abbotts leadership ambitions?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:05
|
|
|
Tribunal will deport Houli citing Abbott's plan to lower house prices.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:09
|
|
|
Two weeks, if Schofield gets the same there'll be riots lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:10
|
|
|
Was held at intentional. Remained at high impact...gets 2 weeks. Good behaviour ≈ 2 weeks? It's cause he's a Muslim isn't it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:28
|
|
|
TG-Chrono posted:Was held at intentional. Remained at high impact...gets 2 weeks. Good behaviour ≈ 2 weeks? Tribunal isn't bound to the box system and yeah they said that his record played into getting into down to two weeks
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:33
|
|
|
Schofields lawyer is calling the umpire a liar now lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
I really feel this was a very poorly conceived defence.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:38
|
|
|
I feel a Lionel Hutz crossover meme coming up.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:40
|
|
|
Malcolm Turnbull's character reference - My Bachar is not a thug. He may be a liar, a Muslim, an idiot, a thug, but he is *not* a porn star!
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:44
|
|
|
Schofield lawyer contending that olivers jaw was sore from jawing Schofield in the spine
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
Of all the nights this is he one I most wish the tribunal were televised
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 10:46
|
|
|
Jeez you know you're scraping the bottom of the barrel when you ask to introduce The West Australian into evidence
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:09
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:What does this mean for Tony Abbotts leadership ambitions? "Could I uh, have gotten Mr Houli off the charge of uh, shirt fronting Mr Lamb? You bet you are, uh, you bet I could"
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:10
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Jeez you know you're scraping the bottom of the barrel when you ask to introduce The West Australian into evidence Newsprint is a dead. I want to know what Perth breakfast and/or talkback radio has to say. They'll clear this right up in a fair and unbiased way.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:10
|
|
|
Can anyone remember if the tribunal acts as a review or a full trial when sitting on an appeal? If it's a full trial he has a small shot of getting off, if it's a review of the MRP decision they've done gently caress all to contest the original decision.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:16
|
|
|
"If the impact was anything higher than negligible, Oliver wouldn't have looked to retaliate" - Barry Zuckerkorn, he's very good
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:19
|
|
|
David Grace is a literal Tribunal wizard between getting jack Viney off and managing to get them to buy whatever his story was tonight. I think no suspension is correct and consistent with what the MRP has done this year but boy I can't see how they arrived at it by what he was saying. Hopefully they clear it up next year by saying intentional and high contact is an automatic one week.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:38
|
|
|
Given Parker got only a fine for a far worse elbow this week, this is a fair outcome. If they had suspended Parker they may have had a leg to stand on, but this is the afl mrp so lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 11:52
|
|
|
So is Oliver now officially a diver? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 12:06
|
|
|
realbez posted:So is Oliver now officially a diver? Considering the guy made contact with his head I'd say there's thirty or forty guys a week who do worse by throwing their head back in a fair tackle but I might be somewhat biased.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 12:08
|
|
|
#justiceforclarry
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 12:51
|
|
|
realbez posted:So is Oliver now officially a diver? Yep! I mean it would have hurt, but yeah
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 12:56
|
|
|
Clayton Olver folds faster then superman on laundry day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
thepokey posted:Yep! I mean it would have hurt, but yeah The impact or the whiplash?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
Pretty hosed up if tom McDonald doesn't win goal of the week imo. Over the shoulder snap while being tackled by McGovern with 20 seconds left for the 11th and final lead change of the match
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
I don't understand how they settled on only two weeks for Houli
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
AFL is appealing Houli's ban as not being long enough. To be fair whether he claims it accidental or not knocking a guy out the way he did deserves more than 2 weeks. Also Garlett has also been ruled out in addition to Salem for the Sydney game, and Watts hasn't come up yet. Pretty nervous about Buddy getting a big bag if Tom McDonald is still playing forward.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 03:49
|
|
|
No watts, hogan, garlett, Salem, jones. I'm fine, this is fine.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
snaeksikn posted:AFL is appealing Houli's ban as not being long enough. To be fair whether he claims it accidental or not knocking a guy out the way he did deserves more than 2 weeks. Oh, good. I didn't know that. 2 weeks is what he would have got if the mrp had simply graded it careless, isn't it? Straight to the tribunal for them to decide it was intentional but still only worth 2 weeks is pretty ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 04:31 |
|
|
Vickery Rance Houli Richmond sure have been a lovely bunch the last few seasons. Edit: Don't forget Conca.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2017 04:42
|
|
