Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Ace of Baes posted:

added, anyone else who needs to be added lmk i havent updated it in like a month lol

me, i suppose. dsa san francisco, wife and i joined in november but i didn't see this thread until yesterday.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
is anyone going to comrade pisspiggranddad's event on may 14th?

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

logikv9 posted:

:siren: Hello DSA thread. :siren: Your lovely OP has organized a gangtag for those of you who have donated a minimum of $5 to the DSA, if you choose to have it.



If you would like it, please quote this post along side proof of a donation of sufficient quantity. Proof can be simply quoting an older post you made previously that itself contained donation proof, or if you are a new donor that wants it, quote this post alongside proof of that donation.

I can nearly guarantee that your title will be safe and sound underneath your avatars within five (5) business days, or whenever I check this thread, really. :hai:

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
Went to a socialist feminism panel put on by my local along with International Socialist Organization and Socialist Alternative. There were some tankies outside who had a less solidarity-based message and more a purity-based one. Inside was much better, though one panelist I think could have done a better job about a response to this statement from National.

Still it was good. I hope we can keep up the solidarity with other socialist groups and build a local leftist coalition.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
Did a socialism happy hour. Tonight was announced on meetup and I met 3 people who showed up that were not yet members but found us on meetup and decided to meet some comrades. That's extremely cool and good and is quite inspiring that just tossing out a flag of "hey, we're socialists and we're going to meet up after work this day" results in new people showing up. Also met a Goon and acknowledged Goonness.

Stairmaster, join and email your local, depending on size of your local, they may have a bunch of smaller working groups or committees that will meet on other nights of the week.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Well... he showed up to happy hour/national delegate fundraiser raffle tonight. As far as I saw he did not buy a ticket and I didn't really see him chatting too much but he was on the other room so idk maybe he did. I did not get a chance to talk to him at all. It's weird, he's real thirsty for our endorsement and we are still nothing at all locally so even if he gets our endorsement we can't even offer him poo poo, we're enough to maybe canvas a single neighborhood.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

business hammocks posted:

Is it likely this proposal will pass?

lol, no. DSA tripled in size in a year and most delegates are not going to be from the people around more than a year ago. National has managed to do poo poo all to help any locals organize so there's poo poo all chance of the same delegates voting to first ask their members to pay like 8x as much and then give national 80% of their own members dues while simultaneously calling for a more centralized top-down model.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
The proposal is asking for at minimum 2x annual dues paid out over a monthly basis of minimum $10/month with an expected 8x-10x annual dues when averaged out over all members.

Then the proposal says the split should be 80% national, 20% local. National would receive between 6.4x and 8x more annually than they do now if the general estimate numbers in the post are accurate and it were to be adopted.

There are zero hard budget numbers justifying why national needs that kind of funding. They don't even give us a rough on "uhh, yeah we want 1 regional organizer per XXX members". They don't give us the regional distribution of members for us to judge the necessary number of national staffers, etc. How can I possibly judge their request without knowing why they are requesting that. Also, they primarily push organizers when imo, the first regional staffers from national should be conflict resolution and grievances because there's enough human capital at large chapters to provide that but smaller ones are going to either have no one experienced/trained or have conflicts of interest.

I did actually just find this, which at least goes into things a little bit more into detail. Just started reading. https://docs.google.com/document/d/16ZZ2OFzrquZK6Vt_Ll9W5kpLjX1PGagWnn8FjyGgk0I/edit

fermun has issued a correction as of 10:12 on Jul 8, 2017

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Accretionist posted:

Walmart's a top 30 firm.

If you work at Walmart, you deserve a $40/hr raise.

Walmart's shareholders thank you for your $40/hr paycut.

WALMART: $10/hr for you. $40/hr for shareholders.

That's a dollar every 90 seconds.

You're walking around with the shareholders hands in your pockets.

The shareholders are stealing a dollar from you every 90 seconds you're at work.

Retail is actually more labor-intensive than average top 30 firm work and retail is more likely to split the load of a full time employee over multiple part-time employees, which I don't think that profit/employee metric captures. I believe the profit/employee metric says 2 part time workers are 2 employees, so it makes retail look much lower in profit/employee than it would otherwise be.

Walmart made $6,714.40 profit/employee on average each quarter over the last 5 quarters.

Walmart's full-time employee schedule is 34 hours a week as their standard, which is $15.19/hour in profit if all their employees are full time, and goes up the fewer hours/week their employees work.

So they are fighting against $15/hour minimum wage while taking more than that in profit per hour the employee works.

fermun has issued a correction as of 05:33 on Jul 17, 2017

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
I did not go despite it being only 8 blocks away. I was making chili.


Anyone going to the bay area DSA camping trip this weekend? I'll be there.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
71 locals sending delegates to the convention! Pretty amazing.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

big black turnout posted:

also how do y'all stay so fabulously up to date on dsa going ons

Online, I participate in our local's slack, the dsa rocketchat stuff, use my basically unused facebook account to check my local's facebook a couple times a week, and I follow everyone from my local that I can on twitter.

In person I go to something once a week and my wife typically goes to 2 a week and we compare notes on any that we didn't both go to.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

big black turnout posted:

there's the rocket chat that I've filled the form out for 3 times now and never seen or heard anything from

something like 50 new people joined today after there not having been any new people joining in a while, so I think there's someone looking at the forms now.

My wife and I joined as a family plan, so we had to choose one of us to use rocketchat and also we only got 1 vote in the straw poll a few months back, and only count as 1 member for our local, and national just like doesn't reply to anything so I'm like 3 months from my re-up and since national has no system to account for there being multiple people in a family I guess.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

I Am A Robot posted:

lol so no one here actually knows what the spring platform is?

https://dsaspringplatform.org/

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Jaffe was at the general tonight and joined a working group. He's an active comrade now.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Ace of Baes posted:

I'd take a socialist who decided to run over a politician who decided to become a "socialist", but who knows if he's going to regular meetings maybe he'll become radicalized, class consciousness is a hella of a drug.

Don't get me wrong, I would prefer that too, and I have a lot of concerns about some of Jaffe's supporters.

I just think it's funny that Jaffe joined a working group because I honestly did not expect that.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

big black turnout posted:

is there any rule against a dog being on the organizing committee?

does the dog pay dues?

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

ChickenOfTomorrow posted:

which group?

Sorry I had to leave early, please thank your spouse for being my proxy :)

Conflict resolution. He said he's done over 500 mediations and has experience in training people in mediation and if the group is interested he can help train.

She didn't get to be your proxy for much in the end, there was a hangup with passing the criminal justice committee, they had some language in their charter regarding the committee's ability to kick people out of the committee that people wanted more clarification on and then there were a few amendments from the floor so we had to push all bylaw votes to next meeting because of it.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
What's to discuss really? Bob Avakian already told us who we support (Bob Avakian).

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Business Gorillas posted:

i think a lot of it is bellyaching but some of it is real

ex: the amendment regarding requiring 20% of chapters or 8% of members for the NPCs to debate on something is pretty fuckin convenient when NYC has 11% of the members by itself

Is that still the case? They only have like 5 or 6% of the delegates from what I saw and I think that'd track pretty well to proportion of members, though obviously NYC DSA is massive compared to every single other local.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

big black turnout posted:

do people actually use it? maybe im just in the wrong channels but nobody ever says poo poo

People will talk in the #general, #random, and #twitter rooms, but not very much still.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Business Gorillas posted:

i'm not interested in regional organizers until i get specific information on how they plan on recruiting them

coastal chapters recruiting people and sending them into the midwest and south is... uhh... not gonna go over well

imo, first we radicalize the juggalos and then we recruit from there

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
Just got home from a panel DSA SF had with Bay Resistance, SF Rising, ISO, and SF Berniecrats, plus there was a representative, Jovanka Beckles, from Richmond Progressive Alliance, a progressive coalition that was able to take control over a working class city here in the Bay Area. Plus there were some Socialist Alternative people that showed up as well as a few Marxists who were unaffiliated, and it was like... really good. Turnout was about 160 people, roughly 35 from DSA SF as best I could tell. Crazy turnout for a Friday evening Municipalism panel.


Our local's publication livetweeted it. It looks like they messed up and replied to an earlier tweet at some point creating two threads.

https://twitter.com/phoenix_sf/status/891108842179772416

https://twitter.com/phoenix_sf/status/891112967080628224

Video and audio exist somewhere as well but idk if they are online yet.


Judging by Twitter, everyone from all organizations there seem pretty excited about finding ways to work together. It was incredibly positive. We've got 5 more of these we are arranging, different topics and different orgs each time and with this one having gone so well I'm pumped about next month's.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

ChickenOfTomorrow posted:

Dang, wish i could have afforded the gas to go.

Final NPC candidate listing is up: https://dsaconvention.org/npc/

Maxine Phillips's decision to split her own vote by running as two candidates is a real power move, but it may prove disastrous for her chances.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
https://twitter.com/DemSocialists/status/892157813899898880

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

OhFunny posted:

I wish more the DSA chapters had their Constitutions and Bylaws online for frame of reference. All I can find is the NYC-DSA's Constitution.


Here's SF's: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ap2tx7yJ0wUn_gMfDjq5kxHFdUXU89Jg2mxB9diZlmM/

It needs some updating because we all agreed in our steering committee that the way it is written on some things is not how we intended it to be. The biggest thing is that we elected an all-woman-identifying steering committee which is against the rules of the bylaws at the moment. There are some bylaw amendments we are going to pass to get that in order next general.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
I think that the on-paper numbers are likely to see some shrinkage starting in November from the people who joined but never went to a local not re-uping. The actual number of people who are showing up keeps growing though. I'm hoping for >20,000 extremely in the streets comrades in a year.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

OhFunny posted:

Thank you. This is very helpful.

We are changing a few things due to issues we ran into:

1) We restrict who can vote to active members, and only establish active membership through general meetings. We decided to allow people who go to working group or committee meetings to be considered active members and allowed to vote. When people show up to weekly working group/committee meetings and yet have trouble making the general a couple times, they shouldn't lose their voting rights. As such, we through near-unanimous vote decided that people who are active in Working Groups or Committees can vote in general meetings if approved by either working group/committee co-chair.

The particulars of this are possibly changing as there are 2 main options for how we want to change this, either nomination by the co-chair as one, or attending 2 of the last 5 working group/committee meetings.

The opposition to this was by some people who are pretty parliamentarian and think that we should've changed the bylaws before allowing that.


2) As our bylaws are written, the Steering Committee has to facilitate all general meetings themselves. It takes a lot of work to be on the Steering Committee and we want more than just the same few people facilitating all the time. The Steering Committee was given the authority to find facilitators instead of having to do it themselves every time.

I think this was unopposed.


3) We elected an all woman-identifying Steering Committee. The understanding from the bylaws-writing working group was that banning this was result was unintended and that the purpose of the language had been to prevent two men as co-chairs. By unanimous vote we decided to ignore this part of our bylaws and correct the bylaws to match intention afterwards.




When is your bylaw drafting meeting? Ours was intense.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

fermun has issued a correction as of 01:55 on Aug 3, 2017

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
https://twitter.com/sfldsa/status/894401883934261249

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
The full delegate list along with their self-written bios were given 6 days before the convention started along with like 60 pages of proposals and amendments and the delegates were also overwhelmed with the platforms of the two larger slates. It was a lot of material to sort through in such a short time much less vetting outside of provided materials.

Give no time to do any vetting and get a NPC member who wouldn't have been voted in if they'd been vetted.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Shear Modulus posted:

when we have built socialism all phone plans will be unlimited

We will have unlimited texting and data, phone minutes will be harshly rationed to prevent the bourgeois excess of calling someone when it's not a god damned emergency.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Serf posted:

i suck at texting. i just call people

First against the wall.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Larry Parrish posted:

What exactly is good about Texas besides the oil fields anyway. It's hot and humid and a lot of dumb assholes move there to act like it's 1870 still

Then next year let's act like it's 1871 and bring about the Paris, Texas Commune.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

100 degrees Calcium posted:

Lot of cops in this thread

We're all coprades here.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Howard Zinn posted:

With the Establishment's inability either to solve severe economic problems at home or to manufacture abroad a safety valve for domestic discontent, Americans might be ready to demand not just more tinkering, more reform laws, another reshuffling of the same deck, another New Deal, but radical change. Let us be Utopian for a moment so that when we get realistic again it is not that "realism" so useful to the Establishment in its discouragement of action, that "realism" anchored to a certain kind of history empty of surprise. Let us imagine what radical change would require of us all.

The society's levers of powers would have to be taken away from those whose drives have led to the present state-the giant corporations, the military, and their politician collaborators. We would need-by a coordinated effort of local groups all over the country-to reconstruct the economy for both efficiency and justice, producing in a cooperative way what people need most. We would start on our neighborhoods, our cities, our workplaces. Work of some kind would be needed by everyone, including people now kept out of the work force-children, old people, "handicapped" people. Society could use the enormous energy now idle, the skills and talents now unused. Everyone could share the routine but necessary jobs for a few hours a day, and leave most of the time free for enjoyment, creativity, labors of love, and yet produce enough for an equal and ample distribution of goods. Certain basic things would be abundant enough to be taken out of the money system and be available-free-to everyone: food, housing, health care, education, transportation.

The great problem would be to work out a way of accomplishing this without a centralized bureaucracy, using not the incentives of prison and punishment, but those incentives of cooperation which spring from natural human desires, which in the past have been used by the state in times of war, but also by social movements that gave hints of how people might behave in different conditions. Decisions would be made by small groups of people in their workplaces, their neighborhoods-a network of cooperatives, in communication with one another, a neighborly socialism avoiding the class hierarchies of capitalism and the harsh dictatorships that have taken the name "socialist."

People in time, in friendly communities, might create a new, diversified, nonviolent culture, in which all forms of personal and group expression would be possible. Men and women, black and white, old and young, could then cherish their differences as positive attributes, not as reasons for domination. New values of cooperation and freedom might then show up in the relations of people, the upbringing of children.

To do all that, in the complex conditions of control in the United States, would require combining the energy of all previous movements in American history-of labor insurgents, black rebels, Native Americans, women, young people-along with the new energy of an angry middle class. People would need to begin to transform their immediate environments-the workplace, the family, the school, the community-by a series of struggles against absentee authority, to give control of these places to the people who live and work there.

These struggles would involve all the tactics used at various times in the past by people's movements: demonstrations, marches, civil disobedience; strikes and boycotts and general strikes; direct action to redistribute wealth, to reconstruct institutions, to revamp relationships; creating-in music, literature, drama, all the arts, and all the areas of work and play in everyday life-a new culture of sharing, of respect, a new joy in the collaboration of people to help themselves and one another.

There would be many defeats. But when such a movement took hold in hundreds of thousands of places all over the country it would be impossible to suppress, because the very guards the system depends on to crush such a movement would be among the rebels. It would be a new kind of revolution, the only kind that could happen, I believe, in a country like the United States. It would take enormous energy, sacrifice, commitment, patience. But because it would be a process over time, starting without delay, there would be the immediate satisfactions that people have always found in the affectionate ties of groups striving together for a common goal.

All this takes us far from American history, into the realm of imagination. But not totally removed from history. There are at least glimpses in the past of such a possibility. In the sixties and seventies, for the first time, the Establishment failed to produce national unity and patriotic fervor in a war. There was a flood of cultural changes such as the country had never seen-in sex, family, personal relations-exactly those situations most difficult to control from the ordinary centers of power. And never before was there such a general withdrawal of confidence from so many elements of the political and economic system. In every period of history, people have found ways to help one another-even in the midst of a culture of competition and violence-if only for brief periods, to find joy in work, struggle, companionship, nature.

The prospect is for times of turmoil, struggle, but also inspiration. There is a chance that such a movement could succeed in doing what the system itself has never done-bring about great change with little violence. This is possible because the more of the 99 percent that begin to see themselves as sharing needs, the more the guards and the prisoners see their common interest, the more the Establishment becomes isolated, ineffectual. The elite's weapons, money, control of information would be useless in the face of a determined population. The servants of the system would refuse to work to continue the old, deadly order, and would begin using their time, their space-the very things given them by the system to keep them quiet-to dismantle that system while creating a new one.

The prisoners of the system will continue to rebel, as before, in ways that cannot be foreseen, at times that cannot be predicted. The new fact of our era is the chance that they may be joined by the guards. We readers and writers of books have been, for the most part, among the guards. If we understand that, and act on it, not only will life be more satisfying, right off, but our grandchildren, or our great grandchildren, might possibly see a different and marvelous world.

I don't necessarily agree with 100% of Zinn here, but I think it's important we be utopian to some degree with our socialism.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Professor Bling posted:

Yeah see this is what I was hoping to hear but I guess "no national platform" is better than "NYC and SF said no so no guns"

gently caress off. SF DSA is not anti-gun as a chapter.

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Serf posted:

city people ain't gonna take up farming imo

We should make them, comrade! It would be a / cultural revolution!

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

Larry Parrish posted:

It is p weird that i guess candidates weren't required to provide any kind of deep background on themselves and nobody else bothered and now people are upset that nobody bothered to look things up for them before they voted

National gave delegates 6 days to read all the candidate provided material and all material on everything to be voted on.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
Didn't DSA National staff just organize under CWA last month? DSA National needs to publish some poo poo about how CWA is a reactionary organization. Let's get beef going with everyone

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply