|
i like gobots
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
 pew pew
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
Oh hey the thread is open um ok that was quite a N0...
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:Inf has been forced to think before he posts for the first time in... hell, forever I don't know if I like this brave new world we find ourselves in.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:Stop posting LNP policy here I think there're plenty of Aussies they'd be fine with shooting.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 06:56
|
|
|
Tirade posted:P. sure two of the deaths are flavour, Slasher Hawke was the only person actually signed up. ok I was hoping that but hadn't checked. would be a little unfair otherwise (but very funny)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 07:35
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:you're probably pissed i wish i was rather that stuck at work
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 07:40
|
|
|
At this stage I'm happy to keep Inf around to see what his deal is. I'm fine with lurker lynching. Hiip and Fisk are the current lowest candidates.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 09:02
|
|
|
It'll be very out of character.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 12:55
|
|
|
At this point I think we have no way of knowing if Inf's telling the truth or is pulling off a very elaborate deception. I'm not going to volunteer to test his lynchbomb threat, since I think at this point either we a) learn he was telling the truth and lose two town (presumably) or b) get lucky and find out he was lying and putting himself out there in a very suicidal fashion. I wouldn't be shocked that if Inf really is scum he actually has some sort of lynchbomb, as it would explain why as scum he's trying so hard to keep himself in the headlines. I'm not sure whether that sort of thing is "fair" in this sort of mafia, though - does it seem like it would be too unbalanced for town to give scum that kind of signoff? Either way, I'm comitted to killing a lurker rather than Inf since at this stage the risk far outweighs the reward, and nobody else has given any particular reason to be suspected. There's plenty of time, though, so I'm holding off voting to give everyone time to post.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Does that include me and Mills? Or no opinion there on our exchange? I hadn't recalled anything that stood out in my memory as particularly concerning, but I've slept three hours in the last two nights so I may well have glossed over something. I'm working now and sculling coffee so when I get a sec I'll reread and post my thoughts.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:##postcount I'm not sure of a lot of the timezones - where are the bottom 5 or 6 people located?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 01:07
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I don't know yet if Mills' intentions are bad but iajanus showing up to pretty much paraphrase my lurker opinion after all that makes me nervous OK, going back through the thread, I may be misreading this but you and mills did a quick "vote Bif" "hi Mills" and then nothing, then I said I'd be Ok with lynching a lurker like Hiip or Fisk (all on page 4), then you came out on the next page and said that you'd be fine with lynching Hiip rather than Mills or Tith. ( I can go back to get the quotes if you want but I'm in a bit of a rush). Are you intentionally misremembering the order of the conversation or should I be getting suspicious? Sorry if I'm mistaken. I still don't think there's anything suspicious about your exchange but your latest comment is a bit more intriguing.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 01:15
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I had to go back and look cause I thought you just hadn't read our latest posts but you're right, you'd already mentioned it on page 4. I forgot about it in the ensuing tsunami of Inf posts and Mills acting like I was the only one who was suss for it. No worries, it's been a nightmare trying to get my head around Inf's purported PR and the usual D1 noise. I'm tempted to have a nap at lunch to see if that helps  Bifauxnen posted:also, my suggestion of Hiip was not taken from checking who had the literal lowest postcounts or meant to back up your suggestion, but from my personal experience of knowing that even if he does post a lot, half of those posts may just be "ey yo its ya boy" I remember that from a couple of previous games, which was why I was happy to namedrop him when I saw he was down the bottom of the count. I figured it might kick him into gear, at least (and hopefully with something meaningful).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
tithin posted:Holy poo poo, Anidav just made an enemy for life murder for real at the next brisgoonmeet
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
Mills posted:Bold is mine for emphasis. I would seriously ask everyone who is town to think about whether they would explain the situation this way. I can't see myself throwing the word presumably on the end when my setup assumptions are that 1. Inf is town (based on what he just wrote), 2. I am town. It's an over-wrought, over-worded explanation from someone over-thinking an attempt to post "content". Wow, you go to sleep for an hour and when you come back there's a shitload of posts and you're the new target de jure. Wonderful. I would seriously ask anyone who's played with me before if this is my normal posting style. Yes, I'm idiotically verbose, but that's just me. I used the word "presumably" because I'm guessing scum wouldn't be dumb enough to be caught in the potential blast of Inf's explosion, but they might try to push the vote carefully anyway to get rid of a couple of extra town. tithin posted:I dislike this. The conclusion is wrong, although you're right with regard to the fact that there's higher odds of hitting town (purely because there are more of them out there). It makes no sense for all of the scum to be talkative early, and it makes a lot of sense to try and sneak through at least one member of the team without them saying anything incriminating. I'd be very surprised if one of the scum isn't hiding at the bottom of the list somewhere - hell, if it's anything like the last few games I've played when we get to read the scumdoc there'll be one person completely silent with everyone else screaming at them to show up and contribute. Mills posted:It's time to vote! Ahab Itualliar posted:In that case I say it is survival of the fittest. I am suspicious of Mills, now, since he's come out of nowhere to push a claim on me which Ahab jumped to agree with, then tried to make it keep rolling by implying to everyone that it's almost lynch time, again with Ahab following closely behind. When he was told that there was still a full day of time to go, he just sailed on by and kept just pushing the case on me, with no details and no acknowledgment of the fact that his lie/mistake was called out.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:
Where did I say I want to sacrifice town? I said that given your lynchbomb threat it's very unlikely that scum would be dumb enough to risk putting themselves in the blast radius, and later that I'd be happier to vote a lurker since I'm not getting a good read on anyone and believe that there's a decent chance that one of the lurkers is scum, based on prior experience with scum having one or more people talking heaps, letting someone sneak through without drawing attention to themselves (and misdirecting as necessary). As such, I think there's a decent chance of catching one scum hiding in the bottom group, with the negative result being someone who isn't posting anyway. Given no more attractive options that's where I'm voting for now. I note that Mills completely ignored my point about him and Ahab having a double team act of first focusing the attention on me, and then pretending hammertime was near to try to keep up the attack. Whilst it could be an accident, I'm marking it as suspicious since he never tried to explain or correct himself.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 08:07
|
|
|
Mills posted:Yes. Let's try to link two unflipped players as scum with no information other than that they both suspect a third person. A stellar idea. Please tell me more. Still ignoring the question about insinuating it was hammer time a day early?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:Link the post Sorry, am on my phone at a client. I'll quote it when I'm back off site in twenty minutes or so.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 09:11
|
|
|
Mills posted:It's time to vote! This was 45 minutes before "hammer time (minus one day)". All of the original mills posts about me came within 1.25 hours of the purported time, which seems to me to be a pretty big push to get a quick vote on me. When the real time was pointed out mills disappeared for a while except to just tell taste to vote for me (shortly after being told about the time).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 09:46
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:I still think MMG is a better choice Sure. After another night with 2 hours of sleep I'm nowhere near the right headspace to try to argue properly and I don't really care since it's D1. Feel free to vote me out, although it isn't great for town if you do. I'm Megatron, 3P deposed leader of the Decepticons. My entire raison d'etre is to hunt down and kill Starscream as retaliation for being ousted. Each night I get to name a target, and if it's him I shoot him and win the game. If it's not, nothing happens. I assume Starscream is scum. ITT AMA about being the deposed head of the evil team!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
Whoops, missed that if I hammer him I also win.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
And unusually for 3P I don't win just for making it to the end.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:how come you haven't voted Anidav then lol i'm too tired to work out if this was a joke or if I'm missing some glaring clue 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 21:57
|
|
|
Mills posted:So basically what I said about you not being town because of the way you wrote that post was prettttttttty good. Not really, since that's how I always post
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Wait your night power is just looking at people but only identifying Starscream? Yeah; paraphrasing the PM each night I can check out a player; if they are Starscream I shoot them. I then get my 3P win condition which (as I've mentioned) says that if I kill him or hammer him then I win. No other ways to win, like surviving  . If someone else kills him I get to float around like a sad robot.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Anidav posted:So we can't use you as, say a sad Starscream obsessed cop? Well, yes. Until he dies, when either I won the game or am totally useless (except for helping with logical deductions).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
I don't really have a strong opinion between MMG or Inf but I'd like to hammer whomever is on the block in case I get lucky and win the game D1 (although maybe not Inf since that may well be suicide).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
mafiaedit: whoever
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Ahab Itualliar posted:No you had it right the first time. and you're right, I shouldn't have second guessed myself 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:I'm sad to say I must go Good luck, but god drat you for making me parse this as a limerick that's missing the last line infuriatingly.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
I'm happier to vote Fisk rather than MMG but will hammer either as a chance to get lucky with Starscream and avoid a nolynch.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
Well, with you and me that brings it to 7 for MMG, which is closer than I'd assume we'll get in the next 1.5 hours for Fisk. I guess we'll see if more people show up.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
I've seen double voting being both scum and town but more often scum.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
I'm here and definitely voting, I just want to be last for my chance to get starscream.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
OK, leaving as late as possible to see if anyone else is voting... ##vote MMG
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 03:29
|
|
|
as if being in hospital is any excuse for neglecting your auspolformer duties
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
As might be surmised from me not getting an awesome post saying I won the game (and no death for my target) I did not find Starscream last night. Not sure if I should post my target but they're now cleared from Starscream suspicion from me (although obviously could still be scum).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 11:09 |
|
|
Anidav posted:Ok so your result is a star or not star result with no indication of alignment. From all the info I have it's basically WIN THE GAME or nothing at all. Although in this case I got that the action failed, so I'm not 100% sure if that's just what it's called when I miss Starscream or someone interfered with me. I guess I'll learn if that's the standard response as time goes on.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 23:43
|
|