|
You're flipping out about some sort of universal haze of meaninglessness, but these arguments are based on the opposite of uncertainty: the fact that innocent people can be and are convicted, and the fact that the appeals process is more expensive than keeping someone in prison forever if necessary. What moral or practical reason overrides that? It's not like we have too little prison space, and there's much easier and better ways to reduce prison populations.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 09:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:23 |