|
logikv9 posted:i'm still pretty sure nothing matters I'm getting that tattooed on my buttcheeks.
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:42 |
|
|
What percentage does he have to hit again?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
new phone who dis posted:Are you going to put one word on each cheek or strategically place the O in Nothing on your rear end in a top hat? I like the way you think
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
"We want the Democratic Party to change! And we'll do it by sending a message. The message: just don't be a Republican! That's the true secret to obtaining a progressive government! Just concede everything!!!!!" I don't even mind Ossoff, but some of y'all bitching about some voters' attitudes is dumb.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
Yeah, basically.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
If you are not being represented either way, what motivation do you have to vote?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
I'm actually going to meet O'Rourke tomorrow, hopefully!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:42 |
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:also keep in mind the thing we are arguing about is whether or not ossuf and like-minded dems should throw a non-commital bone to progressives. they don't even have to push for it. when asked about single payer, they can simply say they support it but don't think it's realistic and say they will focus their efforts on improving obamacare or putting in a public option or something like that. they won't even throw progressives a bone. this will gain them votes overall. republican ads will portray them as supporting gay luxury space communism healthcare no matter what they do or say. the main disadvantage for ossuf saying he supports a medicare-for-all-like is scaring away wealthy donors.  I would rather see actual commitment to a progressive agenda, but most of these fuckers won't even attempt to placate the left. Not even an "I'd like to, but..." So yeah, I should vote for establishment candidates anyway. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 16:28
|
|