Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

Main Paineframe posted:

superdelegates didn't steal the election

neithet did the russians.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

for as much democrats moan about the electoral college and how the popular vote doesn't determine the presidential election, they sure as poo poo are hypocritical when it comes to the structure of their own primaries with superdelegates

sexpot
Nov 12, 2016

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

comedyblissoption posted:

for as much democrats moan about the electoral college and how the popular vote doesn't determine the presidential election, they sure as poo poo are hypocritical when it comes to the structure of their own primaries with superdelegates

Ahem

*taps mic, leans in*

"Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh it's ok"

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

comedyblissoption posted:

for as much democrats moan about the electoral college and how the popular vote doesn't determine the presidential election, they sure as poo poo are hypocritical when it comes to the structure of their own primaries with superdelegates

people generally only complain about things that matter

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Main Paineframe posted:

people generally only complain about things that matter

lol what?

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

Main Paineframe posted:

people generally only complain about things that matter

🤔🤔

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
Nah.

cargo cult
Aug 28, 2008

by Reene
has anyone yet pointed out that carter page literally had repeated contacts with a russian spy who worked for the same development bank that kushner met with. the spy was also being targetted by preet bhrara. fuckin lol at all the tankies itt earnestly posting that there's nothing untoward about memebers of the trump team doing legit business with russians.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

remember all the complaining about the electoral college in 2008 or 2012?

me neither

it's only when it plays a significant role in leading to an undesirable result that people bitch about it - like when a president you don't like loses the popular vote but still gets to be president

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Main Paineframe posted:

remember all the complaining about the electoral college in 2008 or 2012?

me neither

it's only when it plays a significant role in leading to an undesirable result that people bitch about it - like when a president you don't like loses the popular vote but still gets to be president

I was responding to the more general statement that "people only complain about things that matter" which is absurdly false and probably even negatively correlated.

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

:agreed:

voter suppression is bad

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

Gringostar posted:

:agreed:

voter suppression is bad

Not having a message that motivates your own voters is pretty bad too though

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Gringostar posted:

:agreed:

voter suppression is bad
this is a map of people dissatisfied with american politics i think moreso than a map of voter suppression

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

comedyblissoption posted:

this is a map of people dissatisfied with american politics i think moreso than a map of voter suppression

people are really bad at acknowledging more than one thing can affect an outcome at a time itt

JeffersonClay
Jun 17, 2003

by R. Guyovich

Not a Step posted:

Not having a message that motivates your own voters is pretty bad too though

comedyblissoption posted:

this is a map of people dissatisfied with american politics i think moreso than a map of voter suppression

Putin's goal was to depress turnout by undermining faith in the US electoral system as well as to diminish Clinton and advantage Trump.

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
I stole the election for Hillary you're welcome

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
It was easy as pie all I had to do was post on the internet

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

logikv9 posted:

I stole the election for Hillary you're welcome

boy are you in trouble when we have your quarterly performance review

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

JeffersonClay posted:

Putin's goal was to depress turnout by undermining faith in the US electoral system as well as to diminish Clinton and advantage Trump.

was about the same as 2012, so...

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

comedyblissoption posted:

for as much democrats moan about the electoral college and how the popular vote doesn't determine the presidential election, they sure as poo poo are hypocritical when it comes to the structure of their own primaries with superdelegates

republicans have won the popular vote 1/5 times and the presidency 3/5 times since the year 2000

dem superdelegates did not and afaik have never caused the winner of the party's popular vote to lose the primary

that seems like a pretty big difference

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Yeah, superdelegates have no influence when the media reports candidate X winning with 350 delegates before a single ballot is cast/caucus caucussed.

E: just like money has no influence on politics

And misinformation never sways public opinion.

Corky Romanovsky has issued a correction as of 02:44 on Apr 5, 2017

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
superdelegates is to bernie as russia is to hillary imo

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Corky Romanovsky posted:

Yeah, superdelegates have no influence when the media reports candidate X winning with 350 delegates before a single ballot is cast/caucus caucussed.

E: just like money has no influence on politics

And misinformation never sways public opinion.

sounds like u got... superowned

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

wizard on a water slide posted:

republicans have won the popular vote 1/5 times and the presidency 3/5 times since the year 2000

dem superdelegates did not and afaik have never caused the winner of the party's popular vote to lose the primary

that seems like a pretty big difference
superdelegates are a democratic party invention that only exists so that the democratic party can try to overturn a popular vote while attempting to claim legitimacy

the fact they haven't had to invoke the nuclear option yet doesn't somehow mean that superdelegates aren't a terribly undemocratic system. as head of the dnc, blowing off criticism of them by invoking russians is farcical.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

comedyblissoption posted:

superdelegates are a democratic party invention that only exists so that the democratic party can try to overturn a popular vote while attempting to claim legitimacy

the fact they haven't had to invoke the nuclear option yet doesn't somehow mean that superdelegates aren't a terribly undemocratic system. as head of the dnc, blowing off criticism of them by invoking russians is farcical.

Superdelegates exist so if there's a three way race where no one gets a majority they can avoid an equally undemocratic convention fight.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Corky Romanovsky posted:

Yeah, superdelegates have no influence when the media reports candidate X winning with 350 delegates before a single ballot is cast/caucus caucussed.

E: just like money has no influence on politics

And misinformation never sways public opinion.

lol if you think that had a meaningful effect on the primary result

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Bip Roberts posted:

Superdelegates exist so if there's a three way race where no one gets a majority they can avoid an equally undemocratic convention fight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-round_system

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
is this before or after we nuke caucuses or are they still "good"

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

no poo poo there are better options but superdelegates didn't steal the election

unlimited shrimp
Aug 30, 2008

Main Paineframe posted:

lol if you think that had a meaningful effect on the primary result

Inasmuch as they influenced the conversation and helped to frame certain possibilities as inevitabilities (e.g. "don't waste your time with Bernie because the superdelegates are in the bag for Clinton"), they had about as much an effect as Russia did on the general.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

i never said they stole an election. i said they are an incredibly undemocratic institution. complaining about the electoral college while keeping around something even more undemocratic is called hypocrisy. even the republicans dont have something as stupid in their primary system.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

comedyblissoption posted:

i never said they stole an election. i said they are an incredibly undemocratic institution. complaining about the electoral college while keeping around something even more undemocratic is called hypocrisy. even the republicans dont have something as stupid in their primary system.

No, the winner take all events the Republican Primary has are way worse.

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

logikv9 posted:

is this before or after we nuke caucuses or are they still "good"

look at who won them and then search your feelings

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

JeffersonClay posted:

Putin's goal was to depress turnout by undermining faith in the US electoral system as well as to diminish Clinton and advantage Trump.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

the trump tutelage posted:

Inasmuch as they influenced the conversation and helped to frame certain possibilities as inevitabilities (e.g. "don't waste your time with Bernie because the superdelegates are in the bag for Clinton"), they had about as much an effect as Russia did on the general.

It's heartening to see that the Republicans care so much about whether or not the Democratic primaries were fair to a candidate that goes against everything they stand for. Real noble of them

Lamebot
Sep 8, 2005

ロボ顔菌~♡
gwarsh
https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/855179842840604672

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Like, what are they invoicing him for?

theflyingexecutive
Apr 22, 2007

get hype y'all, he's gonna flip bigly

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

Corky Romanovsky posted:

Like, what are they invoicing him for?

apparently the cia tools that were leaked after trump was voted into office

oops

  • Locked thread