|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 21:24 |
|
|
low resolution and a bad aspect ratio
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Jabor posted:low resolution and a bad aspect ratio
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
im fine with the standard pixel pitch but i dont like the aspect ratio
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 02:59
|
|
|
What's a good aspect ratio?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
16:10
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 03:04
|
|
|
3:2
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
square pixels, square screen
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:square pixels, square screen - microsoft when designing the 'surface studio'
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
16:9 is acceptable as 1440p, imo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
My 4k monitor is 16:9 and it's not bad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
1440 is now the lowest i will go
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
I like my 1080p, 28 inch monitor because I primarily use windows and its hidpi support is garbáge
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
1080p at 28 inches is practically low dpi
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 05:57
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I like my 1080p, 28 inch monitor because I primarily use windows and its hidpi support is garbáge haha lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
akadajet posted:My 4k monitor is 16:9 and it's not bad. 4k blows on everything other than osx. 6 years since the iphone 4 and no one else has figured out good dpi scaling yet.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 08:37
|
|
|
my lounge pc has 1080p and is 50" so the DPI is something like 12
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 09:14
|
|
|
1080p is perfectly fine... for a phone. on a monitor this is garbage resolution. lol if your eyeballs are subjected to visible pixels. always be hidpi
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 14:11
|
|
|
1080p isn't good on a phone
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:4k blows on everything other than osx. windows 10 does it fine. osx is the most seamless implementation tho.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
dead gay son posted:What's a good aspect ratio? 1.85:1 is p dece. 2.35:1 is the best. 1.66:1 is garbage dogshit. 1.77:1 (aka 16:9) is like legislation written by centrist, neoliberal democrats: doesn't really fit anyone's needs, comes from a "compromise is the ultimate goal" mindset, but is better than nothing, so v  v
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
what best resolution for huge fuckin tits
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
pram posted:what best resolution for huge fuckin tits low as possible unless you need to see acne, cellulite, trackmarks, bruises and scars rendered in loving 4K in order to get your end away
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 19:28
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:16:10 shaggar was right. 16:10 can do two full document pages side-by-side. it is the correct productivity monitor. its dumb that they sell monitors in 16x9 because thats what hd movies come in, because for most people computers are for doing work and tvs are for watching movies.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
buttcrackmenace posted:low as possible this all seems pretty good
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:shaggar was right. 16:10 can do two full document pages side-by-side. it is the correct productivity monitor. its dumb that they sell monitors in 16x9 because thats what hd movies come in, because for most people computers are for doing work and tvs are for watching movies. but if i ~consume content~ on a 16:10 monitor there will be black bars!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
I like that 4K exists, because it makes screens with lower, perfectly acceptable resolutions cheaper.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
1024
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
the chinese invented 16:9 so a 24" monitor is actually less pixels than a same size 16:10 monitor, and now they're pushing 21:9 for the same reason. pretty soon we're going to get a 24" 9001:9 and you're going to get nothing inside the box
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 01:51
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:16:10 16:10 is dead, im sorry
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
my dual faux 4k monitors (16:9 3840 × 2160) suit my retinal needs
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
posting in the shaglord honeypot B)
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 02:19
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I like my 1080p, 28 inch monitor because I primarily use windows and its hidpi support is garbge notLikeThis_dot_jif
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
mishaq posted:my dual faux 4k monitors (16:9 3840 × 2160) suit my retinal needs gross
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
24" 4k monitors are just expensive 24" 1080p monitors
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 02:39
|
|
|
mishaq posted:16:10 is dead, im sorry i have a 16:10 24" monitor plugged into my gamin rig right now and i will have it no other way
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:my gamin rig lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:i have a 16:10 24" monitor plugged into my gamin rig right now and i will have it no other way lol if your monitor isnt retina in tyool donald j trump 2017
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
mishaq posted:lol if your monitor isnt retina in tyool donald j trump 2017 retina is a bullshit marketing buzzword oh look i'm sitting 8 feet away from my 55" 1080p tv and i can't see the pixels. it's a retina display
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 21:24 |
|
|
Sagebrush posted:retina is a bullshit marketing buzzword it's called scaling and all your text is super crisp and beautiful sorry about your lovely monitor
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2017 05:39
|
|