|
Hahaha I was trying to take a small mafia break but I just read the description of this and can't say no.
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 22:54 |
|
|
I'm still laughing at this game's flavor - I turned down a job at a knife manufacturing company near Portland a few weeks ago. Apparently it was a good choice!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 23:38
|
|
|
I Understand That I Am A Doublevoter.its me glenda posted:it was an inside job lets go after the person the frickin company is named after Suck it ##vote glenda ##vote glenda On a more serious note, I think 100's reaction to PMom's VT claim is relatively innocuous.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Every time This is a really convincing argument - like I didn't think 100 was scum at first but on a re-read 100YrsofAttitude posted:I'd love for that to be true, but I won't be cross-referencing every game to find it and I won't ask you to do so either because that's ridiculous. This post just sounds unnaturally defensive for this early in the game. ##unvote2 ##vote2 100 Since I don't actually want to use my doublevote to rush anything I'm just going to symbolically keep it on glenda.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
its me glenda posted:murmur twin has extra votes i have ptsd It's been like 5 years exactly since that Awful Survivor game right? Good times 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:I am absolutely not a scrub. I'm not a buster, I work hard for the little money I make, I'll never holler at women, I'm not the snappiest dresser but I don't look like trash, I live on my own, and sure I may be car-less, but I have no need of one where I live (I'll still get one anyway when I can because I miss driving something awful), and I give my companion all the love I can. Hahahahaha yessssss tpink posted:MT is a really good mafia player, so now I don't know what to think about 100yrs. Hi tpink! I'm now nervous that you calling me good is scum buttering me up so tell me what your thought process is on 100 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 22:06
|
|
|
Also I was hoping to be scum this game so I could fakeclaim miller, but oh well.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
The Lord of Hats posted:Also MMT are you a doublevoter because you are the literal Murmur Twins and therefore two people? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxc7S2EyMGk this is a stickup posted:I am raising one eyebrow at this post, intensely You see because the company is called Murmur Twins & Co, I figured pre-game that it would be a funny play that I could make if need be. But it needn't.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I will say that while it's clear that MMT is a doublevoter, I'm a little concerned about her because of this in the games starting post: I've never been a doublevoter before so I'm kind of making up strategy as I go along My thought process was:(a) After seeing Tao's flip I figured there are multiple probably multiple doublevoters in the game so I figured I'd put it out there and see how people react. (b) I don't really see it as all that great of an ability - like to me the whole idea of town is to have an argument capable of convincing a majority, not taking over the vote. I thought about it and don't think there's any huge advantage to keeping it secret. (c) I think doublevoter is like barely better than VT (maybe I'm wrong here?) so I don't feel like it's information that needs to be protected (like if I were a cop or doctor or something).
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Except inasmuch as mmt's "if I were scum" mirrors the first paragraph. I mean, I thought the tell with the pera thing was that the tone of her posts was significantly different than that way she posts as town. It's up to people here to decide if I relayed the "I thought it'd be funny to claim miller" anecdote because I'm nervous scum or because I'm town just stream-of-consciousing on D1.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
its me glenda posted:##vote merk I get that you're throwing your vote around to generate reactions but this feels like a scum101 post. If I hadn't been jokevoting you before I'd vote you here for real.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
Hah, nice.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:The Robot Life Is Very Whacky. Shooting From The Hip Shaft, Madman Stands Out. Calling it now: Keane is a venture capital-ist.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 07:02
|
|
|
The Lord of Hats posted:Also MMT are you a doublevoter because you are the literal Murmur Twins and therefore two people? 100YrsofAttitude posted:It's not so much you're posting like a beginner because you're not so don't try to hide behind that defense. Your post here features a very pointed question. Why worry what MMT is or isn't? If anything it'd be super easy to verify once Ecco does their first vote count. I still feel good about voting you so far. This post reads like scum 100 trying to drive a mislynch on town Hats. 100 is taking Hats' post way more seriously than is warranted, and looks more like an attempt to justfiy a fake read there than it does a real opinion.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I'm pretty satisfied with this answer to my question. Thanks MMT. TMMadman posted:I don't know if I could define Pmoms meta because he usually plays the same way regardless of alignment. Or maybe more accurately, he's got a few different play styles that he uses regardless of alignment. TMM being polite instead of argumentative is like my #1 scum tell for him. This is combined with the fact he's called PMom and myself town without making any scum calls or cases yet. ##unvote Glenda ##vote TMM Also for the record my intention right now is to play being a doublevoter by just keeping 1 vote each on my two strongest scum reads unless a situation arises where it's necessary for me to break a tie. (Ecco - I'll just name the person I'm unvoting when I do so, that seems easiest)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 17:08
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:No offense but go gently caress yourself MMT. I'm am so tired of this meta because it gets brought up all the time and it's why I've basically stopped playing. I just want to join a game where I can relax, have something to read a bit while working and occasionally comment or question people. We're in a game where people roll scum and all I'm doing is suggesting, on d1, that I have reason to believe you (someone who has fooled me in the past) might be one. I'm not trying to actually hurt your feelings or anything! 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:It's personal but not personal. Like, just to be completely straight-up about it - I think you're scum, both because of your content (town reads) and because of your reaction to a very loose d1 case on you. But I'm put off at the idea that you will actually get angry at me if I try and case you and don't know how to proceed because at the end of the day this is all about having fun.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I have said I think 2 out of 24 people are likely to be town AND I gave my reasons for thinking that way. And those two people are probably the people I've played with the most in this game outside of Kash. Who do you think is scum and why?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
Like given that (a) the last time I was suspicious of you I was right (Katamari) and (b) you've said yourself that you've gotten me to back of a scum read on you by acting angry at me I find it hard to regret opening up d1 with the "scum TMM is polite" thing because it leads to our interacting in the game and playing Mafia. I mean, right?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:But do you understand why I'm frustrated, right? Because I don't think it leads to actual genuine interaction. It just feels like you want me pegged into a little box that you can check off instead of actually letting me play my own game. For you it's "Polite TMM is scum", for me it's "Murmur is manufacturing content" (which is used on me no matter what I say). People incorrectly attribute meta reads all the time to me and while I acknoweldge it's annoying, I've always just seen it as one of those things that we sign up for when we agree to play. As you said, the last time we played I called you as scum, didn't push hard enough, and town lost -can you blame me for maybe wanting to be more critical of you in the subsequent game? Like I'll admit that even now I'm reading this conversation and wondering if we're genuinely chatting or if you're trying to manipulate me - I just find that to be fun I saw an effortpost though (and don't remember how my votes are distributed right now) so will reset to: ##unvote ##unvote2 ##vote 100Years
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
I haven't read the game since whenever the last time I posted but have read through the thread and am caught up / re-reading now.100YrsofAttitude posted:I don't think Murmur is using their doublevote on me. Full disclosure: I feel pretty good about the case on you and if really the only reason I'm not using my double-vote on you is because I said I wouldn't stack them. If it comes down to avoiding a no-lynch I would probably use my second vote on you.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:stickup is scum ##unvote2 ##vote2 Tired Moritz TM, after being prodded, names someone he thinks is scum (stickup). Then, instead of explaining why he said that, he makes an argument that I've only ever made as scum. It's easy to say "let's go after lurkers" as scum because he can technically tell the truth (that lurking is bad) instead of having to lie and make up a fake case. He throws a vote on Merk - at the time, the least likely person to argue back.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I don't think anyone else has really stood out for me just yet. What're your opinions of me, 100, and Moritz?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:it's a joke of my tendency to think you're scum in every game!! not this one though (for now). Oh wait I didn't realize that the stickup vote was explained as a joke but the rest of what I said (that I feel his "let's go after lurkers!" > vote on merk was scummy) still applies. Why didn't you think stickup was scum when you said the above?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
On one hand, I agree with the principle of going anti-lurker on D1. On the other, I feel like Hats sounds very similar to (this game) where Hats was town and was low-content / tentative / apologetic for not casing on D1. If we're going to go after someone who hasn't really put out content (other than a joke vote for stickup and a super-convenient vote on Merk/Tobbs before he had any posts) I would strongly prefer Moritz to Hats.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I'm a doc *smoking emoji* Why'd you post this?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 01:56
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I'm a doc *smoking emoji* Also what's your flavor?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:Saying the truth win games. Which of these sounds more likely? (A) Moritz is a town doctor who, while not a vote leaders, decided to claim on D1 because "saying the truth wins games". He decided this outweighed the risk of the doctor getting NKed (or roleblocked or something) on N1. (B) Moritz is scum who realized the case on him has merit and he couldn't find an acceptable fake case so he claimed doctor to dissuade people from voting for him. I've scummed with TM before (Swan Song and in that game he tried for a fake claim to take the heat off of him. This seems very similar to that. Also in that game, he very clearly knew the value of doctors (when we discussed targets and stuff) which makes me feel reasonably sure he wouldn't have just shared that info, unprovoked on D1, if it were actually true.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:Did you miss it the first time?? I actually did, but that doesn't change my opinion. Also I'm probably going to be asleep soon.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:The problem with (B) is that Moritz has, like, one vote and only a few people who have passingly commented on liking him for scum. There's no heat to take off. They also don't need a fake case; they could just join the bandwagon and no one would give a poo poo. I think it is, because you can look at a question like "what was Moritz's motivation for claiming doc there?". At the end of the day, the most beneficial reason for someone to claim to be a doctor (even moreso than actually being a doctor) would be so that people didn't vote for them. Pretend you're a town doc and talk me through the thought process that would end with you claiming.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 02:46
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't trust PMOM's wishy washyness. What's your flavor?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
Mithross posted:It was a 3p scum team. We could have won with town if I'd lived another day (I assume. It would have been weird to end the game just because the queen was dead). We also thought from reading our role PMs we would win with town if it was just us and vanilla left with the mafia eliminated. We even discussed claiming if it came to that. Hahaha TMM you bastard! I'm making a mental note to just double down the next time I make you angry in a game so hopefully you're not actually mad next time it happens. Yeah I dunno I guess I shouldn't have shown I was a double voter (I was actually a triple voter) but at the time I really didn't think scum would care that much about a town double voter. Oops.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2017 11:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 22:54 |
|
|
TMMadman posted:Sorry MMT, please note this section from our scum doc: Hah yeah I was wondering how you could possibly be mad at me for making that case given that you were scum the last time I made it. I think I would have gone after you if I lived so fair enough for killing me n1
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2017 13:00
|
|