|
Votecount for Day 3  Retro Futurist (2): Kashuno, Bifauxnen, Mayor Glowku, tpink (1): Your Personal Muse, Not Voting (6): drowned in pussy juice, Epsilon Plus, Mayor Glowku, Retro Futurist, tpink, Yorkshire TeaWith 9 alive, it's 5 votes to execute. The current deadline is May 26th, 2017 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 0 minutes.
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 13:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
obviously this isn't accurate, I accidentally broke votefinder
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 13:12
|
|
|
oh no Slam  I wonder if that was that you on SSV? If so, thank you so much cause I had totally cooled on that case. You really did town proud.  hey Epsilon and YT, you two showed up before all "oh man, we'll post content later" but then you didn't before hammer. How about you give us some Lumpenlists? Who's your scummiest scum picks down to the towniest towns?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 13:25
|
|
|
 Go Town 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 13:31
|
|
|
Inf I don't always appreciate your live posts but your deadposts are top-notch
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 13:35
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:oh no Slam Yeah not a problem. I managed to get ill Friday morning (after a bunch of stupid poo poo at work Thursday, still am, but feeling better) and the hammer hitting like five hours before deadline caught me off guard. If you don't mind me diverging from the actual question for a moment. There's something that doesn't make sense about the deaths. D1 - This is easy, the vig goes off on HK and scum kill Hal. D2 - The vig goes off again, but there's no NK? My assumption had been that they'd targetted the same person, but that makes no sense given what we know of Slam/Flam's team now. Scum knew the vig would fire at DB, but didn't get two kills. Logically there's probably a medic role somewhere that's staying hidden that stopped the NK that night. D3 - Three kills? The vig goes off and kills one, the NK goes off and kills another. Where does the third come from? Perhaps on D2 scum poisoned someone and that explains the difference? Or there's something with the flavours that we don't understand. I feel like I've almost pieced the puzzle together but I'm missing something. To actually answer your question: You've given me something of a hard question. Everyone that was fairly suspicious yesterday died in the bloodbath last night. So I don't have that much information to go off in terms of determining scum/town and I'm notoriously terrible at the actual reading of people because I am a robot. Here's my thought process. I think RF is suspicious in that whilst defending the idea that we shouldn't murder him for information, he also refuses to claim his role. He got off pretty lucky yesterday and unless he claims I'd be willing to take the free kill for the information. But more importantly, even if RF is town, I think we get good information on both Bifaux and Tpink from his flip since they were strongly in his defense. I also suspect E+ because of his not posting. I note that the same is true of me, but I have a role that can be proven should the need arise that hopefully will provide at least a little assurance that I'm town. I think Kashuno is really strongly town favoured at this point. He was instrumental in the push on stickup and hammered him with Inf yesterday. I suppose that could be scum killing one of their own to gain support, but honestly, he's the one that told inf to do it, not the other way around. People I'm laughing at: DIPJ for this: drowned in pussy juice posted:##vote this is a stickup I dont know why this games so quiet but today feels [i]important[/b] I'm not sure I buy an every day vig in the first place but if stickup flips scum, I want to kill SSV, and if he flips town I reckon slamburger is next Because that was incredibly accurate and ultimately worthless.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 14:34
|
|
|
Well this was a bloodbath. Clearly I was wrong about Infi - and since Kash was pretty much pushing for the same thing and was voting along with him, it makes me less suspicious of him. I still disagree with his reasoning yesterday for wanting to lynch RF but now it seems less scummy.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
One thing about yt's analysis there is that n2 there's no reason to assume scum wouldn't double up on db, although I have no idea what happened there on n3 but whatever it was it loving owned
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:One thing about yt's analysis there is that n2 there's no reason to assume scum wouldn't double up on db, although I have no idea what happened there on n3 but whatever it was it loving owned Sorry to clarify. Flamander and Somber were on the same masonry. Somber's gearing up to murder stickup until flam comes in and they mutually agree to kill DB. Since Flam is scum, scum must have known that DB was going to be shot, so they wouldn't target him.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
You're right but at that point scum wouldn't really have had much information to go on wrt other power roles and were ahead in numbers and could very well have wanted to play it safe by targeting him twice
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:You're right but at that point scum wouldn't really have had much information to go on wrt other power roles and were ahead in numbers and could very well have wanted to play it safe by targeting him twice That's fair. The double up on n2 is entirely possible.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
It's the best explanation I can think of with the information we've been given but I don't know what the final piece of the puzzle is just yet
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
I want to explode with setup speculation but I probably should take a step back and look at how the scum have been posting throughout the game before I go too crazy but here's a thought: imagine a 6 scum setup where each scum is paired with a townie and the other six townies are paired off with each other Let's play some goddamned mafia guys
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:24
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:It's the best explanation I can think of with the information we've been given but I don't know what the final piece of the puzzle is just yet Is poison D2 implausible?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:40
|
|
|
Yorkshire Tea posted:Is poison D2 implausible? I don't know - it's kind of a rare game mechanic so I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. (but I also don't have a better alternative suggestion as to how we ended up with 3 deaths so...)
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 15:48
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:##vote this is a stickup I dont know why this games so quiet but today feels [i]important[/b] I'm not sure I buy an every day vig in the first place but if stickup flips scum, I want to kill SSV, and if he flips town I reckon slamburger is next I think this is a bus. It's way too self conscious. I'm not saying because everything ending up correct, but he gave a weird side note with it.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
I'd still like to vote Bif. Kash also looks bad and I'm getting ~vibes~ from YT's big post
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I'd still like to vote Bif. Kash also looks bad and I'm getting ~vibes~ from YT's big post Lol why, you know you can check votefinder or the OP to see what other players exist in this game YT you said you don't wanna claim your role but if it's a fuckin bus driver maybe you should 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Lol why, you know you can check votefinder or the OP to see what other players exist in this game My role isn't a bus driver, I only gain information.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
I like how YT wants to kill me for not claiming but also refuses to claim
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I'd still like to vote Bif. Kash also looks bad and I'm getting ~vibes~ from YT's big post I also get vibes. I think specifically him clearing Kash for defending town (or whoever he said that about)
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I like how YT wants to kill me for not claiming but also refuses to claim The difference between you and I is that you're free and I'm not.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 01:15
|
|
|
And why should that matter? It's not entirely consequence free, you're still down a townie. Besides, there's still absolutely no reason for me to claim other than Inf said so, and I mean he's Inf
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
I stopped getting notifications for this game
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:And why should that matter? It's not entirely consequence free, you're still down a townie. It matters because you asked the relative merit of killing me, who is someone who won't claim, against you, who is someone who won't claim. Since you're a free lynch when you die we gain information and can potentially hit a scum target with the next lynch. When we kill me then night hits and we potentially have another bunch of people die making the information from my death less helpful. Inf's logic was sound. Since I'd want to lynch you for information related to your role, if you claimed your role then I'd have no need to lynch you for the information. All of this should be caveated by the fact that I'm honestly not sure about what to do at the moment because as I mentioned, most of the suspicious people died last night and I'm really not very good at reading people's posts for intention.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:54
|
|
|
Hi all, hope you're having a nice weekend I'm thinking RF is scummy now cause he is STILL on my case even after SSV's and Stickup's flips. Consider revising your views based on new information, dude. I could see someone else maybe thinking I was bussing Stickup to draw attention away from a scummy RF lynch, but RF himself should surely know that he is town!  ##vote RF shut up Kash yesterday was still annoying
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 03:35
|
|
|
What do SSV and Stick's flips have to do with your actions?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:It's always gratifying to find out people casing me literally don't read
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
Good work teammate
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
Is there some deep, role related thing I'm missing or are you implying that bussing doesn't exist?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Is there some deep, role related thing I'm missing or are you implying that bussing doesn't exist? No need for a deep role related thing, it's that while I've been actually casing those two (admittedly cooling on SSV before the end though, but bringing him up on 2 different occasions before that for independent reasons!) and almost everyone else has been lurking like gently caress, all you can do is apparently wake up and say "yep, just sticking with the same lazyass case as I had D1 even though a lot's happened since then, guys!"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
after RF though, I'd say... Glowku scum.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:after RF though, I'd say... Glowku scum. I don't get this, I'm reading through the game wholesale and he's sort of one of the only "ok he actually seems quite townie" reads to me YPM still feels scummy looking at the way known town and scum interact with him for the most part but at some point vimes comes quite hard for him so I dont know what to think there RF hasn't stood out to me at all one way or another even after his posting picked up which might even be a better scum tell then just acting shady so I'd be onboard with that but I don't see it with glowku
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
the only other thing I have of note to observe is I'm not 100% sure scum can communicate with each other, SSV strongly gives me this impression here SirSamVimes posted:Also, why would I (were I scum) want to kill off a tracker when I always know who he's going to track? All I'd have to do is report to the scumteam who we're tracking and someone else can do the NK that also circumstantially explains why scum might want to target DB the same night flamander convinced his mason partner to vig him
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:32
|
|
|
no wait that doesn't make sense how could SSV have sold out DB in the first place if thats the case
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:42
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:I don't get this, I'm reading through the game wholesale and he's sort of one of the only "ok he actually seems quite townie" reads to me I had that vague feeling too but actually looking back at his posts, he seems to be right in that sweet spot of just posting enough to look engaged, but... not really that engaged. I got no gotcha conspiracies today, unfortunately. drowned in pussy juice posted:the only other thing I have of note to observe is I'm not 100% sure scum can communicate with each other, SSV strongly gives me this impression here that would be interesting, but I think it's a bit too unbalanced against scum.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:43
|
|
|
I'm hung up on the ridiculous setup I speculated about earlier and having 6 scum might just balance it out but unless I'm missing something where SSV signalled he and DB were trackers in thread its not really plausible One thing I noticed about RF that tilts him towards town for me but isn't necessarily damning one way or another is that he was quite early to get in on the flamander free lynch that directly led to another scum getting killed
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:46
|
|
|
I know scum love looking good when other scum are on the block but that just really hosed them over a lot and was a very hasty move if he is scum
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 07:48
|
|
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:I'm hung up on the ridiculous setup I speculated about earlier and having 6 scum might just balance it out but unless I'm missing something where SSV signalled he and DB were trackers in thread its not really plausible Weird. I agree that it's not very plausible that scum cannot communicate because that does seem too unbalanced. At the same time, if we assume a total of 3-4 scum (which would not be unusual in a game this size, particularly with vigs), then we have been *really* lucky with our lynches so far. So the idea of a larger scum team has some intuitive appeal at least.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
Hello I am here. Been spending the weekend with family and will resume shitposting later tonight. That is all.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:30
|
|
