|
btw I don't give all that much of a poo poo but since there's a bunch of peeps I don't know here, just for reference I am a girl goon
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 00:13 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 19:21 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:My gut says its RF. Something is off about his case on Bif is it? It's annoying as hell but it seems pretty par for the course imo like every drat game I try and start poo poo to see who's overreaching the most to get a case on me, but the strategy never loving works cause the dumbest ones still turn out to be town
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 01:25 |
|
Mayor Glowku posted:There's something super off about this post tbh. My gut feel is scummy but my gut is the only thing behind it. I've got my eye on you friend. aw cmon don't you remember our slapfight last time, it was fun
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 01:31 |
|
...wait were you actually scum that game though
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 01:32 |
|
dipj my mason doc is saying some very funny things about you remind me to quote them postgame
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 01:51 |
|
SSV or DB would be better
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 02:05 |
|
Slamburger posted:DB is barely playing. He squeezed out a rambling indictment of you when I prompted him for one but he didn't even lay down a vote. The fact that there are 5 players that haven't even put down any vote at all 1 hr before deadline is yeah I don't know if we can get a new pile of votes on him today but he's definitely worth keeping an eye on tomorrow.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 02:14 |
|
Flying Leatherman posted:----- EXECUTES WILL NOT END DAY ------ DB was one of the few people being cased yesterday and a potential mislynch candidate. DB would've also been freely executable today. This makes it a doubly mind-boggling choice for scum to nightkill. UNLESS someone sold out his dangerous status as a tracker. ##vote SSV
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 00:33 |
|
guys quit fighting my theory is way better
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 00:46 |
|
Yorkshire Tea posted:Sorry, I don't understand this? How did SSV out DB? SSV seems to be DB's mason partner: Flying Leatherman posted:DickBastardly, Strawberry, Town Tracker Mason, died Night 2 SirSamVimes posted:Guess I'm just vanilla now. Presumably they discussed the use of the tracker power. But now that DB is dead, SSV is just a vanilla with no partner they can
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 01:05 |
|
Yorkshire Tea posted:I like that theory! I'd assume that DB was smart enough to not out himself though, if he had such a powerful role. I wouldn't assume that the fact that SSV says NOW he's vanilla implies they were working together to decide who to track.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 01:24 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:Also, why would I (were I scum) want to kill off a tracker when I always know who he's going to track? All I'd have to do is report to the scumteam who we're tracking and someone else can do the NK I did wonder that too. But he wasn't killed N1, was he? Also scum could be doing other suspicious things besides nightkills. Maybe he wanted to track someone inconvenient, and it was time to pull the plug rather than have you tip your hand in arguing against it. Also the longer he lives and the smaller the player pool gets, the harder it might be to kill him off without being blocked or doc'ed or watched or what have you. The main thing that gets me though, is that if scum wanted him dead for whatever reason, even if they didn't know he was the tracker, they'd have had a real easy time of it during the day instead. He'd barely posted, he was already listed as freely executable, and there were people already saying they wanted to vote him. Why was it so important to jump the gun and NK him instead?
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 01:51 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:drowned in pussy juice went nowhere night 1 Interesting! Is this true, YT? Prolly don't say what you did, though
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 01:54 |
|
Yorkshire Tea posted:Yes. I can prove it and my role if need be. (But I don't want to). yeah no worries, just wanted to make sure SSV's info was legit
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 01:57 |
|
well whatever he did didn't kill me obviously, so that blows the "abort abort kill the tracker NOW NOW NOW" theory out of the water. ...unless he was roleblocking me or something and they didn't want that to get outed either still though ##unvote
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 02:09 |
|
yeah let's do it ##vote Flamander
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 02:48 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I'm for any of the free lynches although I don't know if we should do all of them today we don't get those flips till end of day, do we? So yeah, we could ration em out like 1 per day just to see how things go.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 03:05 |
|
Come on and Slam and go and hammer Flam
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 12:19 |
|
whoah wait we get flips NOW? Sweeeet ##vote RF
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 12:45 |
|
I believe Slam, wanting to kill Krell sounds legit ##vote Stickup
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 18:35 |
|
Kashuno posted:Also with me thinking tpink scum and tpink hard defending rf I mean...why not do it? the case on Stickup is better. Way better.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 18:43 |
|
Slamburger posted:Is he though? He hasn't contradicted people posting their interpretation that he can no longer track people. I suppose it could be a feint to leave the scum unsure of whether they need to NK him or not, but since he outed himself without prompting in the first place, that's hardly a great strategy. SSV also still got the tracker results even when DB was dead so seems like they did have some kind of wonder twin thing going on
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 19:10 |
|
since we had 2 kills in one night I believe that there should be a town vig in addition to the standard scum NK. Or it could've been an SK in addition to the scum, but the fact that Flam flipped as explicitly scum and "vigilante mason" suggests otherwise. I strongly believe Slam is town and that scum bothering to talk him out of shooting Stickup is an awesome lead.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 19:19 |
|
I'm actually feeling a little better about SSV now. I don't think he'd be as likely to volunteer that info he did if he was scum.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 22:23 |
|
Also the choice of DB makes a bit more sense if Flam was just desperate to get your attention off Sticks without looking too suss himself. "Let's play it safe and just shoot a lurker" is a nice innocent strategy for a mandatory town vig.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 22:26 |
|
Kashuno posted:However, I would like to kill RF especially since I am curious about tpink I don't see how this logically follows
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 22:35 |
|
Kashuno posted:Tpink puttin out hArd defense of RF lynch I didn't want to lynch RF either once he actually showed up, and hell, I'm one of the peeps he was casing, why are you focusing on just tpink framing it up as a "hard defense"?
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 22:49 |
|
See this RF dude's alright
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 22:52 |
|
tpink has also shown up to contribute by now, it's almost as if the people pushing for lurker cases don't actually have anything to go on!!
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 23:36 |
|
Infinitum posted:Actually I'm pretty sure Kash is scum in my masondoc because I legit do not have any ability listed other than just being masonpals The thought of an Inf/Kash masondoc is giving me loving chills rn
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 23:39 |
|
Infinitum posted:I'd link it if it doesn't get us modkilled Why would you assume that like literally the first 3 flips had nothing
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 23:45 |
|
Slam can you shoot either Inf or Kash please
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 23:48 |
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:Wait why do we want to shoot kash ~WIFOM~
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 23:56 |
|
Mayor Glowku posted:Stickup was the one flam didn't want to kill right? Sorry I'm boozing yeah, congrats even while drunk you managed to read the thread more accurately than Inf
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 00:09 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:I feel like the best pick is ##vote infinitum I wouldn't mind if the vig took a shot at him, especially if the vig is mandatory! But seems like a waste to try and actually build a lynch on Inf when it's mostly based on him not reading stuff and that annoying people. It doesn't exactly let us analyze people's pushes and strategies as much as this interesting case on Stickup.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 07:42 |
|
drowned in pussy juice posted:Inf is being scummy but imo all this poo poo around DB and slamburger has me insanely interested, I'll switch to him to prevent a nolynch but I think there is something way fishier here than infs posts & giant avatar this is like the first correct thing you've posted all game lol
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 07:43 |
|
how exactly does the lynch give us any information if the only reason to lynch him is "lol free lynch"
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 12:16 |
|
Infinitum posted:The same could be said of Flamander, and he flipped scum.. soooooo Flamander was also completely not contributing at all, ever. Even after he was up on the chopping block. Slamburger posted:Fine but you've made that argument and everybody except Inf disagrees with that logic.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 12:25 |
|
voice friend bad (at math)
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 12:44 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 19:21 |
|
Retro Futurist posted:I have no idea but I've already said I'm a bit suspicious of them. Not as suspicious as I am of Bif though, who everyone seems to have forgotten about especially Kash seems to have forgotten about me, he's just all sold on tpink being this "hard defense" even though I've supported tpink's argument and agreed fully.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 18:20 |