|
Okay dude  Do you mean the class action lawsuit or the one that the Sanders campaign filed? e: Seriously, you could do a victory lap or whatever if you want, or you could point me at the correct lawsuit, because there's at least 3 that got covered that I can see and tbh I'm not that interested and evidently neither is Bernie Flesh Forge fucked around with this message at 11:53 on May 29, 2017 |
#
?
May 29, 2017 11:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 10:30 |
|
|
the seth rich thing is a roger stone-style dirty trick to distract attention away from #russiagate
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 11:45
|
|
|
conspiracy theorists are often the ones who end up getting played by actual conspiracies. studies further show that conspiracy theorists are more likely to engage in conspiracies, because it's how they interpret events in the world. a 9/11 truther is more likely to tell a researcher that they would have carried out a false-flag attack were they the president than people who don't believe in the 9/11 conspiracy theory. (but does that make me a conspiracy theorist if i think the conspiracy theorists are engaged in conspiracies?)
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 11:48
|
|
|
Huh, if Jared Beck is leaning into this Seth Rich bullshit then imo that's a pretty big red flag that his case is probably bullshit too
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 11:59
|
|
|
So DNC is murdering people who reveal them. Question is, why? They are already revealed! There's no secret anymore... or ever was. Bodies only make things worse. and above all else. THEY LOST! IF THEY ARE THE ILLUMINATI DEEP STATE HOW CAN THEY loving LOSE?!!!
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 13:36
|
|
|
Bholder posted:THEY LOST! IF THEY ARE THE ILLUMINATI DEEP STATE HOW CAN THEY loving LOSE?!!! Everyone knows the Illuminati is just a decoy you silly goose.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 13:39
|
|
|
The DNC is willing to go to war with Russia than own up to their transparent corruption 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 14:28
|
|
|
The_Cack posted:The DNC is willing to go to war with Russia than own up to their transparent corruption I don't think the DNC can choose to go to war with Russia.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:I don't think the DNC can choose to go to war with Russia. You never saw Wag the Dog? Lots of things are possible when you control the media
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
My favorite part of it all is that republicans believe this poo poo so it's easier to bend over for trump and company to gently caress them "Lol libcucks" they laugh, as a man in a business suit and power tie eats their lunch
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:I don't think the DNC can choose to go to war with Russia. Hillary was chomping at the bit to shoot Russian planes down
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:You never saw Wag the Dog? Lots of things are possible when you control the media Wag the Dog was about not starting a war though.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:Wag the Dog was about not starting a war though. But wasn't it?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
Dunno, the movie was about a fake war where no one got hurt and then Billy Clinton watched it and was like "pfff, hollywood schmollywood" and just bombed a pharmaceutical factory.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:You never saw Wag the Dog? Lots of things are possible when you control the media Like winning the election?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
Bholder posted:Like winning the election? Wag the Dog didn't have Wikileaks ruining everyone's clever schemes
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:25
|
|
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:Wag the Dog didn't have Wikileaks ruining everyone's clever schemes Now you're saying Russian propaganda did swing the election?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Those emails were propaganda?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
The way they were deployed, absolutely just because their contents were (at least partly) true, doesn't mean they weren't used as propaganda
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
I thought propaganda was inherently misleading. Was Collateral Murder propaganda?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 15:56
|
|
|
Considering they constantly pointed towards single emails without context. See this email where one representitive answered to a journalist? They are totally in cahoots. See this term "I look forward working with you again"? It totally means they are in control. See this email about pizza? It actually means children, they are pedophiles.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:02
|
|
|
Toadvine posted:I thought propaganda was inherently misleading. Propaganda is about how information is applied, "misleading" or not. I'm not sure what Assange's goals were with Collateral Murder so I have no opinion about that, although omg he's a blatant Russian clearinghouse these days
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:05
|
|
|
Propaganda is anything that makes the U.S. look bad. That's what CNN told me.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
Ahahaha Assange cites Washington Post coverage in that
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
I can never remember which one is Vile and which one is TBW....
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
If it turns out Seth Rich was the dnc leakman would the dnc leaks still be propaganda?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
if my balls turn out to be gigantic would that make you love me?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:25
|
|
|
spoiler, they're not gigantic 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:25
|
|
|
I'm not a balls guy sorry. How's your chest hair and muscle definition?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
extra stout posted:uhhhh you skipped the very brief and simple points in my post, misread part of it then listed off coincidences with absolutely no value? I don't address your points because any points that I make will be discounted. You point to coverage downplaying the DNC lawsuit as evidence of a conspiracy. You point to the initial coverage as evidence of a conspiracy. There is nothing that I could say to convince you otherwise.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
Lote posted:I don't address your points because any points that I make will be discounted. It is not the existence of coverage that is suspicious, it is the nature and qualities of the coverage itself.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
Bholder posted:So DNC is murdering people who reveal them. A Bernie Bro like Seth Rich coming out and saying he's the leaker would really cramp the style of the whole Russian narrative
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
Toadvine posted:I'm not a balls guy sorry. very hairy but not defined by any stretch Seriously why on earth would you buy into dumb poo poo like this? Are you genuinely dumb or what?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
If Seth Rich hacked the DNC and gave the results to Wikileaks why did a Russian hacker (or group of hackers) claim credit for it? https://twitter.com/guccifer_2?lang=en
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
Jukebox Hero posted:My favorite part of it all is that republicans believe this poo poo so it's easier to bend over for trump and company to gently caress them "As a man in a business suit and power tie eats 364 of their lunches, every one of their breakfasts, and every one of their dinners for that year." Is more accurate a representation of what the rich are doing, proportionally. I'd get into fractions on that one remaining lunch if I were greedy, but I'm not. I think my point has been made without it.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:38
|
|
|
Because the dnc has shown itself time and time again to be untrustworthy, conniving and wholly uninterested in anything beyond maintaining wealth and power. It's not that I believe the dnc murdered Seth Rich, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least. And the Russia outrage they've manufactured has been a massive distraction for too many people and will neuter plenty of genuine criticism against both parties for years to come.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
So you do believe this extremely bullshit thing but you also don't believe it. Ok dude  You're loving dumb lol
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:44
|
|
|
"manufactured" lol yeah nothing to see here, everything's fine
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
I'm confused why Seth Rich would identify himself to Assange while leaking the documents. It just seems like it would be stupid thing to do after what happened to Manning. I though the whole point of Wikileaks was for anonymous drop?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 10:30 |
|
|
Podesta was drafting the Russia angle on election night to distract the willing half of the population away from the very real failures of the party's mentality
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 16:48
|
|