|
8-Bit Scholar posted:I'm struggling to beat Dagon in the single player challenges. How do I beat Dagon in the single player challenge I want his card I ran into the same problem as you. I got it after probably a dozen tries. Understand that the AI is extremely predictable, and will draw the exact same order of cards each time. I used pretty much the default monsters deck with a couple tweaks (adding in Archgriffins for chorts, another first light for cleaver) Mulligan for weather clears — you want at the very least 3 ways to clear weather. You want a first light going if you're going into round 3 for RNR.
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:48 |
|
|
I've gotten to level 10 with strictly Monster Weather, but I'm thinking of branching out and trying other decks as well. What's a decent, fun deck to play out there? Dwarfs?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 16:08
|
|
|
ShowTime posted:Do you want to rank climb or just have fun? Mostly interested in fun, but I don't mind seeing better rank numbers. I play this for about an hour or two at night after work up to second tier dailies, and don't have any real ambition to play more then that. Sounds like dwarves is a good fit, then?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 16:49
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:With the mages that spawn cards, do you need to actually run that card in the deck? with the wording of Spawn I'm gonna go with no but eh. Spawn = No, those cards are made from the digital aether Summon = Yes, they must be in your deck.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Looks like Itlienne will not be getting an enormous nerf — the original was a mistranslation. Just +2 strength.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
In addition to frost, here's what most people have been waiting to read:quote:Weather changes:
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
e: double post
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
Anyone else just stocking up on kegs right now in an attempt to get some of the soon-to-be nerfed cards for milling?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
This should mean a strategy could be to craft nerfed gold premiums, and mill them post-patch for a pretty solid powder -> scraps conversion.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 12:55
|
|
|
Maybe there's an accounting/economic reason they can't give you back meteorite powder, but this is nearly comically broken on how easy it will be to get golds during the refund period if you're willing to part with some  . I don't see them doing this in the future, but who knows.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
If you have any spare scraps & powder you should probably go ahead and make premium RNR/Drought. There seems to be zero downside, unless you really value powder (which is silly since you can buy it directly).
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 14:28
|
|
|
The Iron Rose posted:Do you have to craft then convert the legendaries before the patch? This is the likely assumption, yes. Otherwise it's tantamount to having a cash:scraps ratio for 5 days.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
frajaq posted:Goddamn Skelliege really has some stupid cards and they're everywhere, like cockroaches. I'll stop playing this until the next balance patch because holy poo poo As a relative beginner playing the meta Skellige bears deck, I'm just amazed at the flexibility of this deck. Feel like I have answers for literally everything the opponents throws at me.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
Skellige bears doesn't have to win R1 either, due to the carryover value of Morkvarg and the insane finishers in Hjalmar & Shieldmaidens.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2017 12:49
|
|
|
The acute issue with the previous patch was the sheer volume of changes. I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing to be on a 2-3 week cycle for balance changes, but each large patch needs a solid direction on behalf of the devs. It's impossible to do anything specific when you change each faction so drastically. You then open the door for many things being broken — which is obviously difficult to cover in a following patch without leaving new holes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2017 15:42
|
|
|
No Wave posted:Reddit is stealing our enjoyment again. We can't keep letting them get away with it. Feel like MP game devs teams learn very quickly (usually through a similar visceral experience) to just ignore the internet except for bugfixes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
I did all of the challenges before dumping any cash into it, so it is definitely doable. Mind letting us know what you're having trouble with? It's likely just a couple basic principles you're missing that aren't as apparent from the get-go (e.g., card advantage is an enormous premium in this game — much more so than something like HS or MTG).
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:All the flying ghost babies. I would imagine early next week, like last time.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Turin Turambar posted:Does it protect from Reset effects? Not sure if this interaction was patched in or not, but last time I checked Shield will not protect from Reset effects, but it WILL protect from weaken effects that are resolved at the same time as the Reset (i.e., with Peter Saar, shield will not protect the reset from occurring, but it will shield the weaken).
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Reality Winner posted:Have they talked about bringing this to phones at all? I'm sure they're thinking about it, but I doubt it's a priority before the release.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm up to something dumb like 39k scraps. Gonna wait for the meta to settle before I do anything.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2017 02:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:48 |
|
|
Subvisual Haze posted:A reset+weaken effect will still reset though (Mardroeme/Peter), which feels strange. My guess is that reset isn't coded to trigger a power-reduction flag, since it's not strict power reduction. Obviously, CDPR could add some logic for this, but for all I know it could be a balancing thing. BitesizedNike fucked around with this message at 19:52 on Jul 10, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2017 19:47
|
|