|
okay what is the personal or political relationship? you were appointed by the president? so no AG should ever investigate the executive?
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:25 |
|
|
If it is so blatantly obvious in the rules of the DoJ, then what the gently caress took you so long.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
Wtf was that "I totally would've reported the meeting, which didn't happen, if I had remembered about it, even though it definitely didn't happen"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
i think we all know the first question is going to be what took you so loving long and he's not laying any sensible groundwork so no matter what his answer is going to be is going to look dumb as poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
He's stumbling and these are the loving softball questions
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
Its really weird how this is the first time this regulation has come up. So strange. So very strange.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:okay what is the personal or political relationship? he was a surrogate during the campaign (a position he just started claiming today, I think?)
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
Snuffman posted:Trump is going to fire this guy before the day is done. Maybe not that quickly, but Sessions is writing his own pink slip here for sure
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
Is Franken going to have another go at him today?
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
KickerOfMice posted:Is Franken going to have another go at him today? No
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
"it became clear to me over time this plain regulation i keep explaining to you that i would have to. please don't ask why it took so long. please."
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
So you weren't involved in the political campaign in anyway. However you use your position as a political surrogate to justify the recusal because of the CFR.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
lol burr doesn't realize the "general" in "attorney general" is an adjective.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:Wtf was that 
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
KickerOfMice posted:Is Franken going to have another go at him today? Franken is on judiciary, this is intelligence.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
LEAKS! *drink*
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:lol burr doesn't realize the "general" in "attorney general" is an adjective. Lol you don't realize it's an honorific
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
KickerOfMice posted:Is Franken going to have another go at him today? He's not on the committee. Harris on the other hand is going to tear him a new rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
LIke the drinking fountain policy. So lax lately, he's probably thinking
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Old Surly posted:LEAKS! *drink*
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
the answer to a yes/no question is never "maybe"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Boon posted:Lol you don't realize it's an honorific jeff sessions is not a general and should not be addressed as such.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
HEH
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
"We need to take care of all these leaks!"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
Way to feed him that answer, Burr
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:jeff sessions is not a general and should not be addressed as such. Shut the gently caress up
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
he is speaking very slowly. Warner will speak even faster to average it out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
We weren't a functioning team. Seems like an ongoing problem in this administration
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
"I gave you the answer mr" is such a sassy answer
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:he is speaking very slowly. Would love to see Burr try to give Warner the Kamala Harris treatment for talking over Sessions
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
Boon posted:Shut the gently caress up sorry you don't get how words work.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
"what do you think of mueller" here comes the skewer
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
He can't even answer an actual normal boring question. Shook  e: hmm, that's not technically a yes to not doing anything, just an allusion to the recusal
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
warner is clearly concerned sessions is filibustering questions
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:sorry you don't get how words work. I love how you revel in ignorance but mock it all the same. Warner addressed him the same way, because again, it's used as an honorific.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
"The proper form of addressing a person holding the office of Attorney General is "Mister/Madam Attorney General," or "Attorney General," and referred to as "Attorney General." The plural is "Attorneys General" or "Attorneys-General"." Jesus Christ, you are not going to be able to stretch your answers to waste his time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Sessions clearly stalling for time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
Hahahaha what a loving buffoon. "Do you trust this person to do a thing?" "*extreme circumlocution*"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:warner is clearly concerned sessions is filibustering questions correctly, of course
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:25 |
|
|
evilweasel posted:sessions is filibustering questions
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 20:23
|
|