|
Let's do it.
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:31 |
|
|
##vote quid
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Scum found
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:So the thing with flipless mafia is that it requires people to actually put effort into posts so others can get a good feel for their tone - do they sound sincere, do they sound forthright, do they sound like they're hiding something. Father's Day was yesterday
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2017 17:06
|
|
|
I would like to lunch a player.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:HURM.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:11
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Ecco, you have come really hard out the gate saying we need to participate and do some major scumhunting. Like I said, you've done a really solid job initially of attempting to control the narrative. I haven't really seen you do any scumhunting yet, which, combined with your hard-nosed attitude, is giving me more pause than if you were simply being smug alone. This is one of the emptiest accusation posts I've seen. The game's barely started, to the point that you had just posted a content game, and you feel the need to say someone else is "controlling the narrative" ??? Seems as if you're trying to conjure up stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:I never presented it as anything else? There was almost nothing that had happened at that point except for Ecco making a jokevote on me, so my reads were understandably light and based on almost nothing. The way the list is presented should have made that obvious? This is a scumpost. Specifically that last sentence. It's not scummy, it's not an accusation, it's just "weird." Quid is above questioning, and he is manipulatively trying to say with this post that "picking at him" is suspicious and weird. You shouldn't do it. I think I'm gonna keep my vote on Quid.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:14
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:I found a way to watch it! I literally ahve the exact opposite reads of this post.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
peramene posted:pera's gonna pera; I don't have anything else useful to say, except maybe this: I refuse to vote Ecco day one short of an outright scum confession. The nature of this experiment demands she see d2 so even if she's scum, I'd prefer to focus the other one first. eh.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
peramene posted:I've gotta be out and about today so I am sad to report that for the most part, I won't be topless. hmmmmmm. this post, specifically that last paragraph, reads Fake As poo poo to me. Sara might be scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Also BK, you are officially lurking at this point, what's up? Nah, I think I fell solidly in the camp of unofficial lurking. But I'm back in action now.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:the early days of Evil Sagan. If I ever have a band and we release a debut album, this will be the name of it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:19
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:I'm gonna lock myself in. if anyone can answer this question I'll reconsider. I think PMush is town. She's acting pretty casual and loose which I have never known her to be as scum and also, while I don't think her case on you was good, I also don't think it was scummy. Honestly, I think Pmush/Ecco is a town slapfight tbh.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:You're manufacturing a problem, like you manufactured a problem earlier with my interpretation of pmush's posts. Agreed. Quid does this as both town and scum, though, he's just a very excitable player. I think he's scum here though.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:25
|
|
|
For what it's worth, since this is a flipless game, I'm not going to vote for people I'm not sure about or think are town at deadline. We don't get information from their lynch, so if I do not think there is a >50% chance someone is scum, I'd rather no lynch. Right now I'm good with lynching Quidnose and Sara, and that's pretty much it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:BK, calling bullshit. You pulled a post from the beginning of the game jokephase as your hingepin, quoted one other early post, and have said nothing about anything else. I've posted a SHITTON of content since then. Why am I scum for what I've done on the last 3 pages? Source your quotes. I made my case. I am indifferent to your satisfaction to my case on you.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 07:05
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:I disagree with BK's case on Quid, but it's good to see him posting. His read on pera is... odd? One shitposter to another, I know it is exceptionally hard to do that rambling stream-of-thought style with anything less than total sincerity. I saw a lot of that in her early posts, so I kind of set her aside, in a sort of "probably town" place, but having it all in front of me, I'm not quite so sure. Don't think I'm going to do much with it as a case tonight, I gotta be in bed in like two hours and she's not here, but I'll be looking at her a little harder tomorrow. It's basically a one-two for me. First is what Ecco posted earlier but I also was thinking, which is that Sara is saying a lot without really saying anything. I think this counters your total sincerity claim, because it's actually really easy to post a stream of consciousness sincerely when everything you're saying is really safe. Not contentless, mind you, but very safe. Second, Sara keeps talking about herself and her play in a kind of third person, like, a lot. Here you go: peramene posted:This is the thing tho, this is Quid - play nice w/ me, hit you. You're picking up on his grumpiness towards me but cite it. He's being chill, he's joking, he's dropping that "oh, pera being pera" (as are you - but compare the difference in how you two do it) like I'm not much of a casebuilder based on bast experience so I don't want reins but are other people seeing this poo poo? peramene posted:pera's gonna pera; I don't have anything else useful to say, except maybe this: I refuse to vote Ecco day one short of an outright scum confession. The nature of this experiment demands she see d2 so even if she's scum, I'd prefer to focus the other one first. peramene posted:I don't like this because it's in favor of long posts with many words which unfairly advantages myself and yourself. Which would be the ultimate scum team and gently caress You to you which is why I'm wondering Kash didn't do it. I was looking forward to it. peramene posted:pera primer: This is the kind of thinking I do as scum, because I want to present my innocuous thoughts about the game honestly and constantly, so as to show my town thinking. But being on that plane of thought in a game to begin with is scummy, and shows a level of strategy you only have to worry about if you're deceiving. Sara's talking a lot about herself, and while she's gonna come in here and say "I do that all the time, regardless of alignment," I think the way it's being done here definitely speaks to a scum mindset. That being said, I still feel Quid more for scum. Him getting angry at me only emboldened me!!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 07:14
|
|
|
I've been playing way too much WoW lately as well as being busy with family stuff but other than D&D tomorrow night (I'm in the same group as Sara) I should be around quite a bit tomorrow afternoon/early evening.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:This is one of the emptiest accusation posts I've seen. The game's barely started, to the point that you had just posted a content game, and you feel the need to say someone else is "controlling the narrative" ??? BottleKnight posted:This is a scumpost. Specifically that last sentence. It's not scummy, it's not an accusation, it's just "weird." Quid is above questioning, and he is manipulatively trying to say with this post that "picking at him" is suspicious and weird. You shouldn't do it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
But, according to Quid, his content on the three pages after those quotes where he was scum was so good he can't possibly be scum
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
peramene posted:Holding our heads up and moving along... This post is full of hypotheticals that are basically just assumed or even obvious and therefore are unhelpful. Like, that last paragraph has a lot of words but is basically devoid of content. Scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
peramene posted:I do that all the time, regardless of alignment. I do that in the loving shower. My post was in service of telling the members of this game, many of who have expressed concern about me being here, that I will be here. It was not a self-meta read or a description of how I normally act. I think the nuance I give on why I find the latter scummy is appropriate.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
peramene posted:This is obvious? Unhelpful? A hypothetical, granted - but a stated hypothetical is a recognized hypothetical. I don't want this notion hitting, say, Quid, so that he can dive on it. Can you honestly tell me that isn't worth doing? Yes. It's not. If someone else jumps on it, I think it's fine to offer this as a defense. If you offer it pre-emptively, I think you're just offering information that's not falsifiable while also showing that you are overly concerned about how you look to others in this game versus how others look and hunting scum. peramene posted:
I think Ecco's contribution was also rather unhelpful, but she wasn't the genesis of the discussion so it's not really pinging me. Also she's been hunting scum a lot.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:Heyo, break time again. I don't believe your jailor claim. This is a scumpost and Quid was your scumbuddy. Otherwise, why did you go so quickly from "I jailed ecco and clearly stopped the nightkill" to "hmmm, I don't know, what if she was the target?" You're backpedaling because it's a manufactured opinion. Claiming jailor D2 is clearly an unconventional move, but in a flipless game you probably think you can get away with it. ##vote pmush
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
I thought Pmush's posting was sincere yesterday, but all of her posting today just screams to me that we caught her scumbuddy.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
Ecco and Sara posted a lot of words that I will read later. I'm really tired today and it's hard to focus on mafia but everyone please read Pmush's posts again with the hypothetical context that both Quid and her are scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:plus I can't grasp why PMush would claim jailor if she wasn't a jailor. Why not roleblocker, to prevent the extremely-obvious "maybe ecco was the target instead dum dum" response? Or just skip the middle-man and go with a cop claim? I will unvote but I don't find your thoughts convincing and I think Pmush is def the scum. Consider my vote on her. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
peramene posted:i suppose I should accept "but also sensible," but I would certainly hope I've earned enough of your respect by now slash in this game for you to know I am above that sort of play. You're either a drat good scumhunter, a hell of an adversary... both, or neither. lmao fwiw I find this post genuine and accurate, and am leaning less scum on pera mostly because pmush is the scum and should be lunched!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
oh okay I am a lot more confused after reading this page
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
okay um wow ugh.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:or is BK pulling a Rarity and responding to posts as he sees them without catching up because lol that'll be funny. yeah. this is certainly a puzzle
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:pera is manic but also scum is the answer. I don't know if I buy that Sara would be able to do such an elaborate fakeclaim. not the cop part, but the breadcrumb, reasoning, etc it's intense.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
please stop referring to her as manic or having mania, Sara is playing the game perfectly fine. I just don't know if she's scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm a lot more likely to contradict myself as town where my opinions change and I'm much more flexible compared to scum where I believe I am beholden to my fake opinions and never change them without very specific effort to do so.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
okay gently caress it I know you're never supposed to claim this but this is a short, flipless game and we don't have a lot of people so this is basically already endgame. Ecco you can berate me for doing this and tell me why it's bad afterwards and it will be a learning experience but I have information that I think it is worthwhile to get out right now that will explain why I want to believe Sara while also lunch Pmush I'm a doc and I docced you last night Ecco. I even privately messaged Kashuno after Pmush's jailor claim to clarify that my night action was successful, and it was. So unless some weird rear end poo poo is happening, Pmush is lying and you were not jailed. It's a gambit and it failed.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
Maybe Pmush is a godfather?? Maybe Sara is an insane cop?? those are a lot more likely to me than other, stupider night action scenarios
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:why the heck didn't you say so earlier. because I'm rusty and prefer VT.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
I was doing the "try your best to get someone lunched while not revealing your action" that is suggested to do as cop
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:31 |
|
|
EccoRaven posted:goodness if it's pmush and quidnose after all this time wouldn't that be the neatest thing. I'm not saying anything, as I said I'm confused. I just have a night action contradiction that would indicate pmush is scum.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2017 23:07
|
|