|
Well, it's time for a Vault bad plan. I'm heading east! Is this a time for "gently caress This poo poo"?
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 18:12 |
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Well, it's time for a Vault bad plan. I'm heading east! Is this a time for "gently caress This poo poo"? might be a good use of it, yes
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
EDIT: Misread. Red's fully aware now right? Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 19:53 on Aug 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
she's back, but just barely (timewise), and you have no real idea how she's doing
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
Gotcha. Was thinking of enacting a titanicly bad plan. E.g. grabbing Amanlu, leaving Red a note, and bouncing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
yeah that's not going to work
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Gotcha. Was thinking of enacting a titanicly bad plan. I see how it is.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
Gotta stay on brand with terrible ideas.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
Vault is the worst. How much damage would it be if I just sucked it up and tried to go aggro back? I'm not quite sure of the moves involved but the new terrible plan involves a grenade.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
the knife is 2-harm
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Sorry for delay, trying to figure out which way Vault would jump here. My initial thought was to suck it up since i have 2-armor and escalate a threat back, but I'm not certain that'd be her choice. Plus it's PC-on-PC, and while AW is built for that, I kind of wanted to open a convo before I push it that line.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 14:28
|
|
|
you can tell her what she wants to hear or back off, I guess? we're explicitly past the point of easy conversation. I suppose you could read "barricade yourself securely in" as "doubling down" if you want.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 14:34
|
|
|
Should I roll Read a Person?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
if you feel there's some reason she wouldn't be level with you / you are willing to deal with the consequences of a bad roll, sure. otherwise this conversation doesn't seem like it calls for it, really
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
It's pretty much a straight hat-in-hand request, so I'll not roll.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
Vulpes Vulpes, are you still around?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 13:08
|
|
|
I am, sorry. Posted.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
So if the medical jargoning gets to be too much, please let me know. Also, The Mayor is free to chat with See during this Mister Bates. She can multitask fairly well and it looks like Vault isn't in mortal peril.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2017 00:54
|
|
|
Vault is the kind of person who uses one word where two would do.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
quiggy, having looked over the situation and battle moves in a little more depth, it looks like you're going to want to look more at the Bait a Trap move; you're going to need to be the bait directly or otherwise put yourself in danger to lure Magpie where you want her. I think that makes more sense than Hunt Prey, at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:quiggy, having looked over the situation and battle moves in a little more depth, it looks like you're going to want to look more at the Bait a Trap move; you're going to need to be the bait directly or otherwise put yourself in danger to lure Magpie where you want her. I think that makes more sense than Hunt Prey, at the moment. Sounds fair. Lemme figure out how I wanna play this out 
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
Hi everybody, sorry I kind of vanished there, it's the first week of class and I also started a new job so I haven't had much free time for much of anything. I'm still around and I'll be back to posting after work tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 06:59
|
|
|
Alright pair of questions about how to resolve this situation mechanically: 1) Can I roll Visions of Death before attacking Maggie? I want her dead if at all possible. 2) Regardless of (1), should I be rolling Go Aggro or Single Combat for this? My gut says Single Combat, but since I have Ice Cold I get a significant advantage to using Go Aggro instead (and could probably justify the "what I want them to do" as "loving die")
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
You've got two options here; you can start a general fuckin' mess with Seize by Force, and if you choose this option, you can also roll Visions of Death. You could also roll Single Combat, which will prevent Magpie's gang from getting (too) involved , but remember that either way you're still on the hook for potentially taking +1 harm from the trap. If you engage in Single Combat, you won't be fighting a small gang, on the other hand. If you want to try to cut and run, you can try to Act Under Fire. I'd say that no matter what you choose, Going Aggro is off the table. That narrative space was taken up by setting the trap and poo poo-talking Magpie. e - Maggie's gun is 2-harm, she's got various stuff on that amounts to 1-armor
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:You've got two options here; you can start a general fuckin' mess with Seize by Force, and if you choose this option, you can also roll Visions of Death. You could also roll Single Combat, which will prevent Magpie's gang from getting (too) involved , but remember that either way you're still on the hook for potentially taking +1 harm from the trap. If you engage in Single Combat, you won't be fighting a small gang, on the other hand. Sounds good. I'll take some time to think about it before posting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Well SeaDee See's time as an Angel is certainly not going to be *boring*
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
You're welcome.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
Now we just need to get Magnificent Max roughed up and I'll have the complete set.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Just gonna have to kill everyone I guess.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
quiggy, mark another harm; by SBFing you engaged the local gang members, too
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2017 13:43
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:quiggy, mark another harm; by SBFing you engaged the local gang members, too 
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
How long should Vault be down for?
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:How long should Vault be down for? Well for the surgery, See wouldn't put you too far under so Vault should be awake at any moment (See was probably closing Vault up in my post). For the healing from 6:00, it will be a week and you can be conscious (but in pain) if you want
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
PoultryGeist posted:Well for the surgery, See wouldn't put you too far under so Vault should be awake at any moment (See was probably closing Vault up in my post). For the healing from 6:00, it will be a week and you can be conscious (but in pain) if you want
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Figure I'm gonna have to be up and moving for that part. See is willing to let you heal up before getting you to do her legwork, but if you dont want to risk being unconscious she'll understand
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Also consider that depending on how Max wants to take his interactions, we may be close to a session end, and you could easily take a week's downtime...
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 03:55
|
|
|
That reminds me, I want to take the Prepared For the Inevitable advance; would it be reasonable to do that if I can talk See into setting me up with some supplies while I hunt for stuff for her?
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
Sounds good on my end
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
Would Vault getting stock for the move decrease See's? If that's the case I'm still ok with it but See would need additional payment. (Most likely a future favor/promise to come to her defense)
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 13:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 18:12 |
|
|
that's not really supported by the game mechanics directly; taking the advance gives you the kit. On the other hand every kit needs a supplier once the starting supply is used soooooooo
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2017 13:50
|
|