|
Innit towinnit
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Don't kill me please. Anyways, confirming that I'm vanilla town What a normal post with nothing special about it. BTW what's your fave pizza size? Mine's **MEDIUM**
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
Anyone up for a Turbo No Lynch? Ton of town info roles out there so w/e let's see what happens. ## vote no lynch If this is an "anti-town" move, then haha I was just kidding.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
Lynching Jester is only as bad as lynching a townie. ie: game doesn't end, just makes a vicory for that player (I think??)
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:not sure i like the "let's do this" and then immediate backing off. this is not commentary on the idea itself just the post tone Ya 50% sure youre scum at this point.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:oh no there's someone trying to actually make meaningful reads and post analysis day 1, must be scum No you're just very jittery. Gut call.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:not in this game, check the role list The OP specifically states that a 3rd party win doesn't end the game. Not quoting it because it's technically "quoting the GM" but it's in the first post, under victory.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:It also talks about how the jester gets to murder a dude after he dies And who doesn't love a random dayvig??
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Mafia edit: Alright I see your point.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Claiming the following Turns out the real prize was the friends we made along the way 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:mod confirmed victory for all thanks have a nice day folks Loved the "Winner" gambit btw; very nice play.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
Flying and Jam are scumbuddies, calling it now.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Ya let's just do this. ## vote Flying . Extreme concern and accusations, but without votes to show conviction (except for a weirdly early bandwagon on Kash).
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:My votes on my current biggest scum read hth Your entire premise for voting him is a blatant OMGUS conveniently bandwagoning, on the guise of "Kash 100% seriously definately wanted to lynch someone for not posting in the first 2 hours of the game." Since that vote you haven't said anything to or about Kash. Yet you have accused a lot of things of other people. It's convenient for scum to be able to throw accusations of scumminess without needing to change their vote.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:I dont see an OMGUS there Kashu FL basically voted Kash as soon as Kash looked in his direction. Seemed pretty clear cut.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:Ok I'm back. And everyone has disappeared. Throwing down a vote and a scum read might get things moving again.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:well i mean a driveby vote is still a driveby vote Ya but if it targets scum then what's the diff?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
peramene posted:i feel like this is a scum post sorry fam Ya it's jam and flying. Seemed like a fake scumbuddy tussle back here: Flying Leatherman posted:i mean i definitely think it's more likely to be jam just misreading the meta rather than actively mischaracterizing because nobody else is gonna read TM that way or be swayed by it, but it's still weird Jamuraan posted:Are you trying to make a serious post about an off the cuff lurker joke comment? Seriously? Flying Leatherman posted:I mean you're posting p serious rn Jamuraan posted:Yeah I don't care if you make serious posts. I care that you took a nothing post and spent a concerted effort trying to throw shade at me.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:Has Hal confirmed? Has he posteD? Hasn't posted.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:Everyone whos not voting where are you?!?!?!?!?!?! Look in the mirror, it's you.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:Everyone whos not voting where are you?!?!?!?!?!?! Ya but you've given no reads at all, haven't voted, and there is no clear lynch target yet. At best, youll be able to throw a hammer vote on anyone at -1. After which of course youll be completely blameless for the results "because otherwise it would have been NL!" Seems a bit like hiding in plain site; barely better than straight lurking.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 03:13
|
|
|
Jamuraan posted:I'm down with voting Hal or Chaoslord. I'm down with lynch all lurkers. I would be up for that as well. For spite and in principal.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 03:33
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:I would be fine with that too, but what do you think of a Fisk vote? Pass. For today, at least.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 03:34
|
|
|
Mr. F! posted:Would you give me your read on Fisk? I think he's doing a really lazy effort that often ties in well with how scum likes to act day1. But Im not convinced enough for a lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
Flying you might want to claim here, though a lynch seems not so likely.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
Well it is past many bedtimes. Growing townies need all the sleep they can get!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 04:54
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't mean literal frame up. I meant like... isn't it weird that the sk would claim to kill because of the lurker policy? It's such an outspoken thing that clearly hints at who it could be That is the epitome of WIFOM. I don't think it's worthwhile to read into it because it's a coinflip as to whether that was written to cast guilt based on D1's lurker convo.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 13:21
|
|
|
I think full claiming roles is a bad idea. I think this format heavily relies on mechanical info; having roles shutdown by NK's is scum's goal. At least 2 nights of info is probably better than weak N1 data foiled by losing that power role N2 to NK. Unless you def found an anti-town role, in which case, probably best to say it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:The fact that a soft-claim scares Pera gives me reason to believe that they're avoiding it because soft-claiming reveals them as scum. Mafia has no info gathering roles, so I'm not sure that makes sense. The only power the mafia has related to info is the framer, but announcing your framed target makes no sense either. Agreed thaat killing SK is a priority. Jester and Executioner would be examples of less relevant 3rd party roles not worth claiming your power role over.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 15:43
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I would vote pera because I think they are executionee anyway. Executioner who won't reveal the name of SK they are pretending to know through a fake-claimed role? Besides, Executioner is not a concern for town survival. IMO, only scum and SK are.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I would vote pera because I think they are executionee anyway. 2 penny bottle imp posted:Executioner who won't reveal the name of SK they are pretending to know through a fake-claimed role? Sorry after Para's post I see you said executionee not ner. I dont see how the executionee is even relevamt.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 17:21
|
|
|
peramene posted:FURTHERMORE - secrecy is power. Now that I've said it's Kash. Town of Salem has wills. But they can sometimes be hidden. Now that Kash knows he's identified (assuming you are telling the truth), he has no incentive to help town. If scum falls before he does, he will lose, because we will have no targets left to lynch.l but him. SK is NOT town friendly. ## vote kashuno
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:actually, it was a phone typo. I meant executioner. I just didn't correct anyone because I realized my logic didn't even make that much else anyway. Fair.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
mafia edit:2 penny bottle imp posted:If scum falls before he does, he will lose, because we will have no targets left to lynch but him.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:kashuno is not the sk. I jailed him last night But you are def the jester after claiming scum, then sk, now jailer. Soooooo
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:your 'stats' are that of a level 0 bugbear. follow my orders lol this is funny but, at the same time, true.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2017 19:30
|
|
|
Mayor Glowku posted:Was gonna keep quiet about your little secret but maybe not now???? Could we stop with all this clickbait BS? Yes, we are all interested, please tell us what you know.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 03:37
|
|
|
Mayor Glowku posted:Is this your first post in the thread? Holy poo poo I didn't even know you were playing Looks like you and me have each posted about 30 times or so. I was av-less before tho so you may not have associated those posts with me.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:i'm not even jester Yo, can scum just NK this guy? I am tempted to put him on ignore.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:this is p funny to me, 2pbi did you forget about the defense phase or did you just want to try and get me to claim d1 for no reason I felt it was different due to timing making a claim expedient. But also I forgot about the defense phase I still think Kash as SK is a great lynch target though. Sorry guy, and thanks for the defense. PS sorry for serial posting I'm on my phone.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 16:37
|
|