|
it's chrome for your app atom? more like egacs: eight gigabytes and constantly swapping  
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 06:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:23 |
|
|
the engine for the moon
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 06:58
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:it's chrome for your app Atom: a ton of memory
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 08:12
|
|
|
electron is computer aids, op
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 08:19
|
|
|
javascript: bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 12:23
|
|
|
Poopernickel posted:Atom: a ton of memory
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
electron is great. it's what wpf should have been.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 17:06
|
|
|
proton
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
it's bad, op
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
the adoption of electron is what you get when you have nontraditional web developers starting to migrate there way towards other types of work same with people being so hot to adopt nodejs
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
lancemantis posted:the adoption of electron is what you get when you have nontraditional web developers starting to migrate there way towards other types of work yeah, because why should the very best frontend tech be restricted to web browsers?
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
akadajet posted:yeah, because why should the very best frontend tech be restricted to web browsers? because the very best that frontend tech has to offer is still hot garbage
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:because the very best that frontend tech has to offer is still hot garbage
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:frontend tech is hot garbage
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
erection 🍆
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
electron is the loving worst
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
is it possible to do electron well? like, is the system inherently flawed, or is it just that a bunch of lovely js developers are writing lovely js apps and so electron seems bad?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:like, is the system inherently flawed, or is it just that a bunch of lovely js developers are writing lovely js apps and so electron seems bad? ¿porque no los dos?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
electron is the JavaScript jvm.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
Punkbob posted:electron is the JavaScript jvm. mother of god
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:is it possible to do electron well? like, is the system inherently flawed, or is it just that a bunch of lovely js developers are writing lovely js apps and so electron seems bad? every single electron app has its own complete duplicate of Chromium, so no
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:is it possible to do electron well? like, is the system inherently flawed, or is it just that a bunch of lovely js developers are writing lovely js apps and so electron seems bad? i don't remember if it's actual electron but vs code is the only good thing i can think of and it still manages to be a pig compared to anything native.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 03:11
|
|
|
akadajet posted:yeah, because why should the very best frontend tech be restricted to web browsers? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKC5jjFkfgo
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
jony neuemonic posted:i don't remember if it's actual electron but vs code is the only good thing i can think of and it still manages to be a pig compared to anything native. pretty sure thanks to vs code, vs2017 now needs to run a node.js instance to provide js intellisense
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 15:47
|
|
|
akadajet posted:electron is great. it's what wpf should have been. wpf was also bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Poopernickel posted:Atom: a ton of memory
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
Plank Walker posted:pretty sure thanks to vs code, vs2017 now needs to run a node.js instance to provide js intellisense
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Plank Walker posted:pretty sure thanks to vs code, vs2017 now needs to run a node.js instance to provide js intellisense this is the only sane way to handle js
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 04:56
|
|
|
Poopernickel posted:Atom: a ton of memory
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 04:57
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this is the only sane way to handle js node is ok npm is hot garbage
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 05:11
|
|
|
i was not commenting on nodejs specifically i just meant that js is resistant to static analysis. doing anything useful with intellisense is gonna require a javascript runtime to eval poo poo and inspect the results. for java ides you can use the js runtime built into standard java implementations in vs.net, welp, kinda stuck with an external tool
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 05:52
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:for java ides you can use the js runtime built into standard java implementations was not aware of this
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 16:52
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i was not commenting on nodejs specifically IDE breakout exploit
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 23:11
|
|
|
i saw a presentation about electron the other day idgi, i thought everything was supposed to be web apps now, who deploys poo poo anymore? edit: i mean apart from peopel with real serious jobs in which case why are you using mobile platforms jfc
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
There Will Be Penalty posted:node is ok i'd rather use npm over zuckerberg's "yarn" or whatever
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:i saw a presentation about electron the other day bad ideas all the way down someone decided "okay, doing this on the web just doesn't work", but instead of just throwing out all the javascript hackery and writing a real program, they figured they could drop a web server on the client machine and point their web app to that instead
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
akadajet posted:i'd rather use npm over zuckerberg's "yarn" or whatever why? yarn is much faster and has a lockfile by default which i find appealing
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
every few months I answer the following questions in sequence "can this thing be done by the browser as part of a web app?" "what, not even with html5????? are you sure?" "as you know, we're deprecating our normal locally-installed software in favor of a web app, and management would really like the web app to be able to do that thing. are you absolutely positive it's impossible? why don't you research it for a while?"
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
i want to do all my group collaboration through a glorified irc/wiki, but i want to do it at 5 fps with 800ms of latency on a $20k workstation
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 05:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:23 |
|
|
There Will Be Penalty posted:why? yarn is much faster and has a lockfile by default which i find appealing yeah, and npm promptly adopted those features. so there's no reason to use yarn now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 15:05
|
|