|
I would say tell her you believe her and go to the scene of the crime before anyone can interfere with it.
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 23:40 |
|
|
We need our money, but we can afford some charity. Give one franc and pass yourself off as police.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
POOL IS CLOSED posted:I'm pitching in with this bloc, since I have no idea. I'm not reading any walkthroughs. I'm just going with my gut instinct.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Give her the good lawyer/bad lawyer treatment.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
Not at all. No need to let the Baron think he has a reason to lie. And keep quiet about the silverware.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
Break that poo poo. Also, how did the Baron know the time so exactly with a handless clock?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
Very illegal.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2017 03:30
|
|
|
Take it. We should study it further.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2017 14:05
|
|
|
Never.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2017 13:35
|
|
|
Yeah, we've got absolutely no evidence on her.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
Of course. The steak makes more sense than cannibalism.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
Is it wrong for me to wish for Sir Raven to be in this game? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qimBHg1Ch54
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Yeah, that clock ain't right and we shouldn't pry on payment.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Well then...
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
He seemed off. How did he remember the names of everyone so clearly, even a lowly flower girl?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
A witty saying proves nothing
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
Impressive
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
It's subtle and nuanced, but in a sarcastic tone of voice.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
How about we offer to get his photos the recognition they deserve?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2017 13:48
|
|
|
Chocolate could give us a lead on exactly who purchased recently.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Ask nicely about who bought the chocolate . We have no reason to believe that he's responsible.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Let's go with Juan, Caterline, and Mousey.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
Yeah, let's get that flower girl
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Keep up the pressure. We have nothing but a chocolate wrapper at this point. Also, she mentioned monkshood. That's quite poisonous...
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
Monkshood is also known as wolfsbane, and that flower girl said she had some. She knows more than she's letting on.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
Get mad.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2017 13:23
|
|
|
Xarn posted:Brute force didn't work last time, let us be polite this time. On the other hand, this dude is an rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
I understand. The flower girl had wolfsbane, which matches the description of poisoning we were given by the hunter in the bar. She was forced to kill the captain of the guard by someone else, and "Juan" took the fall out of love for her.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2017 14:07
|
|
|
Yes We know practically nothing but what we're doing.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
It is strange, yes.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
Yes, the chocolate!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
Oh yeah, I forgot about the west entrance!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
AJ_Impy posted:Coercion and the Judge.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 13:44
|
|
|
AceOfFlames posted:Still better than Pinky, the Brain and Elmyra. It looks like the whole trial was a setup to get rid of "Juan" after a botched murder of the king, though I have no idea why. I think they were relying on heavy circumstantial evidence and a bribed or coerced witness to sway the jury, which meant the whole thing fell apart as soon as we were able to show reasonable doubt.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
Commander Keene posted:I don't recall anyone ever explicitly stating that the king was the target of the assassination attempt. Perhaps Howl was the intended victim all along? It’s mentioned by the prosecution in the trial that Howl intercepted the flower. Obviously we have no way yet to prove that Howl was the target, but it’s always a possibility that they knew he would take the flower. I do find it curious that the flower girl is being telegraphed as responsible (she had wolfsbane) if Howl died from a candy bar. Also, there’s the possibility that the king really was the target and the conspirators are trying to do damage control.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
The chocolate is definitely the big problem though. It introduces reasonable doubt as to whether the flower was poisoned, but it also means the flower girl couldn’t have been trying to use a poisoned flower. Unless....both possibilities are true?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
A falcon never quits, you drat dirty apes!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:The fact that they're worried about us identifying their handwriting feels like a rather solid clue all on its own. Who have we gotten handwriting samples from so far?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:No one that I can think of, but it's probably either someone whose writing we're going to see a lot of, or whose writing they'd reasonably expect him to possibly recognize. I'm actually not too sure on Cocorico. As haughty and annoyed as he was by us during the trial, he conceded that the witness testimony was unreliable after being presented with sufficient evidence. It came off like he didn't know the witnesses was faking in the first place. I don't think he's actually part of the conspiracy, just an rear end in a top hat who thinks he's the smartest guy in the room and the case is a slam dunk.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2017 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 23:40 |
|
|
Zakrelo posted:Agreed. Like I said earlier, I think the big confusion is "Was the chocolate poison, the rose poison, or both?" We introduced reasonable doubt into the jury by pointing out the chocolate wrapper and that it's possible that Major Howl could have eaten a poisoned chocolate bar, as well as proved the witness a liar. At the same time, the swan had wolfsbane (which matched the symptoms of poisoning, as described by the hunter in the tavern) and Renard Vulpes said that he intervened to take the fall for her. This would imply that the rose really was meant to be a delivery method for poison. I'm wondering if it could have been two gambits colliding: the flower girl is blackmailed into poisoning the king, with Renard interfering to save her. But then someone else was trying to poison Howl with chocolate, and one or the other killed him.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2017 14:03
|
|