Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Telarra
Oct 9, 2012

What the gently caress is that intro. Overwrought visuals of some loving prop sketches, over top a theme that's a whole lot of nothing bookended by butchered excerpts of the TOS theme.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Telarra
Oct 9, 2012

Regarde Aduck posted:

This poo poo again.

Of course it looks modernised. The enterprise of the original series looked like poo poo because it was made in the 60's. That's the only reason. That trekkies will somehow head canon this to mean that's actually what space ships of the 23rd century would look like is everything wrong with star trek fans.

The only reason the tech advancement is an issue to you people is because you have brain problems. You are stupid. You can't handle the abstract thought needed to understand that what the ships look like in Discovery is what the ships of TOS would actually like. Essentially the tech upgrade should be done in your imagination which isn't limited by the material and budget available in the 60's. But that's too much for you isn't it? So instead you piss and moan about things looking different and the LEDs being "wrong". You're assholes and you don't deserve this new series.

You forgot to call them pedophiles again.

Telarra
Oct 9, 2012

Grognan posted:

Anyone posted that this is probably the origin story of section 31?

It's set a hundred years too late for that.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply