|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
help
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:GUILTY confirmed
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 01:39
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:Anime gently caress boy oh good a confession nice
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
"peramene" directly translates to "myself guilty" in old bunun
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:I was suggesting that Hal is as good as a stump the way they are now. Not to use it on them. this isn't an accurate representation of your post about hal, and I feel that this is the type of situation that will lead to everyone having hard to dismiss suspicions about you again
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:This is a weird equivocating post. In what way is she suspiciously quiet? pera is extremely wordy, and the utter lack of  is surprising, but it's too early to for us to really say this means anything
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:This seems like a reach less than 24 hours after the start of the game, but what trips me up is Hal thinking something is suspicious while also thinking that "its better not to vote pERA today." (1) it is possible to be suspicious of someone while believing that using an investigation D1 is better than killing someone based on little to no info
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:hal is scum in every single game this is true though
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
help I am being oppressed
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:5. The Judge renders his verdict. If the Defendant is ruled GUILTY by the Jury, the Judge must use one of his [SENTENCE] actions. [SENTENCE] actions include: here are the choices again for reference. the top half can be used if peramene is voted out, and the bottom if it is someone else.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 00:21
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:I prefer an investigation over killing peramene. Top choices to investigate are vector_to and Retro Futurist. why should we investigate either one of them instead of you?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
peramene posted:I am delighted to discover I am being represented by reputable counsel. Surely we can now dismiss the case ##vote peramene
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:In Old Angiln it directly translates to "completely innocent". I cannot dispute this bold claim
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I'm not going to be engaging with people roleplaying as lawyers tbh mostly same but it's fine this early imo
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 14:09
|
|
|
peramene posted:Coming to you live from innovation in game design think tank something awful dot com, direct from today's judge: people having fun is bad as it should be!!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
day one is really important, and significant, always
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:I'm fairly mealy-mouthed, self-deprecating, and equivocating when I write, since, as a rule, I find it hard to take a firm stance on things in life. I speak my mind more often and more sincerely when town as I have nothing to lose. I'm far more cautious as scum since I feel bad letting down the rest of team, as I feel beholden to them to do a good job. btw 100yrs, I forgot to go back and reply to you because I soon realized I was thinking of the lord of hats.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
peramene posted:solid, that makes literally one of you. please don't post about your boner, it's awkward I dunno why you quoted my post at the end as if it's related to 100yrs calling you out for not posting, but I will quote it again as it is important and correct this is a stickup posted:day one is really important, and significant, always
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
let's investigate me, instead, and then pmom can do a funny and kill or stump me, instead
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 19:31
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:It's not that. It just feels very wasteful. We lose a day altogether and nothing's changed. I also think being confirmed town would paint me as target to the scum. If they can't mis-direct people towards me, what good am I to them alive? I don't understand your logic. you want to investigate someone today instead of killing someone today (good), but not you (oh) because nothing would change (  )so if you realize that an investigation paints a target on your back, it also would paint a target on your two suggested targets' backs. it also wouldn't change and more or less than investigating you. why do you want to investigate anyone if this is the case?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
this is a stickup posted:I don't understand your logic. you want to investigate someone today instead of killing someone today (good), but not you (oh) because nothing would change (
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
gulag trying to break the game early gives me good feels to some extent, but people jumping on like this makes me feel p suspiciousRetro Futurist posted:I like it ##vote rf this is a safe, easy vote to throw out early for a thing that will never come to pass rf is kinda hard for me to read but probably a bad choice for activity reasons, and also Tired Moritz posted:Retro is always scum tbh
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
I just realized the irony of feeling bad about rf having an early vote out there
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
your alignment being confirmed to the thread will change the game a lot for you whether you are town or scum
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
##vote tired moritz deadline is in 50m folks, remember it's plurality and we really should split the vote (without breaking the game d1)
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  100YrsofAttitude (4): Diqnol, Jeabus Mahogany, Tired Moritz, peramene Tired Moritz (3): Tired Moritz, Pinterest Mom, b-minus1 (1): QuoProQuid Mordiceius (1): 100YrsofAttitude Retro Futurist (1): Retro Futurist Diqnol (0): Jeabus Mahogany, Jonathan Fisk (0): Pinterest Mom, peramene (0): this is a stickup, Not Voting (5): b-minus1, Hal Incandenza, Jonathan Fisk, Mordiceius, vector_toWith 15 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is September 29th, 2017 at 6 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 51 minutes.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
the desperation you're exhibiting right now worries me a lot more than wasting an investigation on d1, so no, I'm not worried about investigating you. I think you're by far the best candidate.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:Can I just quickly ask for your reasoning before I tie things up? I don't have any strong feelings about his posts. he seems his usual d1 slash town self thus far. but, I am historically bad at reading moritz and agree with the idea that picking a hard to read player is good. he is a wildcard and can be a threat to the town as either alignment. tends to say scummy things. I think he's a solid choice to confirm to avoid this down the road, and as confirmed town, he is less of a threat to town and more to scum tbqh
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
deadline was 6 lil homies 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:See, the thing is, you could have said, at any point yesterday, "I'm not town". to be fair his posts d1 all scream that he is not town
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2017 12:17
|
|
|
I agree with the above, today should be a quick and easy pmom 100yrs split
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Again, "should be an easy 100yrs and pmom split" is a ridiculous concept. Show your work, and show me who every voter in the game is on at the end of the day to make that split work. here's my work, thus far: you should be confirmed as town due to the events of day one, and 100yrs isn't town
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
if YOU want to show why you think it doesn't work, you can go ahead and do that
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:The vote is 6 on 100yrs, 6 on me. Where is 100yrs' vote? you assume that everyone is going show up and vote as someone else tells them to, and I don't understand why you are assuming that
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I'm saying that any scenario where there's a tie between 100yrs and another player requires 100yrs to go along with the scenario, and I don't see a reason for him to agree to that. yes, that's true, but this risk is the same in every case. anyone can manipulate the vote if they don't want to be potentially investigated or killed, or to protect/harm someone else I'm fine with taking the risk and going for a tie. if the consensus is to deal with 100yrs first, or later, I guess that's fine too. what would you suggest?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
hi hello, I am catching up on these terrible ugly broken forums
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
almost ##vote 100yrs still think pmom needs to be investigated
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
I believe that gulag the kind is the scum
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2017 15:46
|
|