|
CannonFodder posted:Would it have a chance to be the first ever 0-0 final score? I assumed 3-3, but that would be even better.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2017 22:46 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 10:21 |
|
4-4 would also be remarkable.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2017 22:58 |
|
Niners are going to beat the Giants
|
# ? Oct 15, 2017 23:08 |
|
and then there were two
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 04:34 |
|
No more undefeated teams and we're down to just the Niners and Browns. Catch the excitement!
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 04:36 |
|
Niners I'll hold judgment on until the Giants game. If they lose that, I think they go the distance Right now I maintain that an opponent actively tanking wouldn't be able to prevent them from beating the Browns. Gonna take a lot for 0-16 to not happen this year, and basically starts with putting anyone but Hue in charge at gametime
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 04:42 |
|
I've got a feeling that the race for 0-16 was more or less unaffected by today.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 04:46 |
|
im going to laugh so hard if the loving browns manage to squeak out a single win last season, only for their grand plan of "get a bunch of free agents" to result in a 0 win season
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 13:55 |
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:im going to laugh so hard if the loving browns manage to squeak out a single win last season, only for their grand plan of "get a bunch of free agents" to result in a 0 win season The 2016 Browns were a 3-13 type of team that had some bad luck (missed game winning FG against Miami, maybe should have beaten the Landry Jones Steelers in Week 17). This year's team absolutely should have won last week against the Jets, but the missed two FGs, were 0/3 in the red zone and had 3 turnovers. Both teams are quite bad but last year they also had a lot of ill-timed injuries and bizarre penalties that killed momentum (remember Pryor's "taunting" penalty against the Ravens?) I think this team will bumble into a win or two down the line somehow.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 14:17 |
|
Bigass Moth posted:The 2016 Browns were a 3-13 type of team that had some bad luck (missed game winning FG against Miami, maybe should have beaten the Landry Jones Steelers in Week 17). This year's team absolutely should have won last week against the Jets, but the missed two FGs, were 0/3 in the red zone and had 3 turnovers. Both teams are quite bad but last year they also had a lot of ill-timed injuries and bizarre penalties that killed momentum (remember Pryor's "taunting" penalty against the Ravens?) I think this team will bumble into a win or two down the line somehow. I think their most winnable game is next week with Tennessee at home. They have a killer schedule.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2017 19:28 |
|
Che's Analytics Driven Week 6 Chase Commentary GIANTS WIN, GIANTS WIN! Macadoo gave up play calling probably saving his job if he keeps his hands off the wheel. The run game looked like a thing that actually existed rather than the fucks the league gives about domestic violence. Destroying the Bronco's WR corps like the gods did to you previously did have something to do with this. Good job avoiding the poo poo dungeon. I envy you even though your coach is a semi-sentient collection of Brylcreem loving 49ers I hate you and your coach. Somehow you keep competitive with a collection of scrappy dumpster fires assembled into a barely functioning transformer that manages to put up a good fight. Shanahan will figure out finishing games eventually and after the tank it looks like you'll have a solid well scouted and coached young roster full of promise. I remember that feeling. Your owner is still a moron though. Till he fucks it up we can't hang out. gently caress analytics and by extension statistics they're an abomination on the world.We don't deserve Joe Thomas or Myles Garrett. There is only darkness. I can't drink anymore.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2017 05:33 |
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Che's Analytics Driven Week 6 Chase Commentary You forgot the elimination of the Chiefs from 16-0.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2017 05:42 |
|
iospace posted:You forgot the elimination of the Chiefs from 16-0. The Chiefs have won games this is not where they belong.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2017 22:26 |
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:The Chiefs have won games this is not where they belong. You have them in the op
|
# ? Oct 17, 2017 22:29 |
|
x-posting from N/V https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/920435531460333568
|
# ? Oct 18, 2017 00:46 |
|
Nothing is stopping this train
|
# ? Oct 29, 2017 17:45 |
|
i'm officially on the Brownwagon now trip report: day 1 we're already circled the wagon train and our horses are all dead
|
# ? Oct 29, 2017 17:51 |
|
You have died of dysentery.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2017 19:51 |
|
Tickets for Browns games are as low as $5
|
# ? Oct 29, 2017 23:22 |
|
The 49ers somehow managed to both be dominated and not look like a completely garbage team but welp I guess their record speaks volumes.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2017 23:30 |
|
Lote posted:Tickets for Browns games are as low as $5 lmao
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 00:38 |
|
Guaranteed you can get them for free if you just show up at game time.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 01:59 |
|
You know the '07 Dolphins were a mediocre team with really awful luck. The '08 Lions were a bad team with awful luck. The '17 Browns are just, bad bad bad bad.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 02:05 |
|
If they had a mediocre QB they would have 2-3 wins but they have the worst QB in the league by a country mile, plus terrible backups.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 03:11 |
|
Plus a terrible o-line. Plus terrible receivers. Plus a terrible defense. Plus terrible front office.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 03:26 |
|
a very good dog on the sidelines, however
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 03:44 |
|
DJExile posted:Plus a terrible o-line. Plus terrible receivers. Plus a terrible defense. Plus terrible front office. With Garrett And McCourtney healthy there defense isnt bad. But they get no help when their offense goes out for 3 plays at a time.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 06:51 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:You know the '07 Dolphins were a mediocre team with really awful luck. The Lions that year were the accumulation of about seven years worth of absolutely awful draft picks, and that's discounting Calvin Johnson who played through that year. No wonder he wanted to retire early
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 09:56 |
|
DJExile posted:Plus a terrible o-line. Plus terrible receivers. Plus a terrible defense. Plus terrible front office. Oline is fine. Defense is fine/good. Receivers, QB and play calling are garbage.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 13:52 |
|
Johnny Five-Jaces posted:a very good dog on the sidelines, however Swagger owns
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 14:27 |
|
Dogs are so loyal. If Swagger was a cat he would have taken a poo poo on the 50 and left like Romo cat.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 14:34 |
|
Bigass Moth posted:Oline is fine. Defense is fine/good. Receivers, QB and play calling are garbage. Dead last in takeaway/giveway, bottom third in total defense, bottom third passing defense, (solid run D), bottom third in points against, and a combination of bad QB signings and o-line play murdering even the average ones that has caused them to have 10 more starting QBs than they've had years of existence as a returned franchise. I get that there are a few highlights every once in a while, and there's a lot to be said for a poo poo offense making life worse for the D. That said, the team is 88-208, it has 4 wins in the last 3 seasons, they're extremely likely to go winless this year, and I have a hard time seeing why anyone would have faith in this franchise at all at this point.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 15:01 |
|
How come the oline is so bad, because they made 2 solid signings (Tretter, Zeitler) and Thomas before IR? That should be the basis for a good oline, right?
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 19:57 |
|
OperaMouse posted:How come the oline is so bad, because they made 2 solid signings (Tretter, Zeitler) and Thomas before IR? That should be the basis for a good oline, right? Its actually not bad, when the QB can move around in the pocket and get rid of the ball in a decent amount of time.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 20:09 |
|
OperaMouse posted:How come the oline is so bad, because they made 2 solid signings (Tretter, Zeitler) and Thomas before IR? That should be the basis for a good oline, right? Kizer holds to ball forever taking coverage sacks because he's an indecisive bitch even against soft zone. The opposing front 7 + safety can play the run every down effectively wrecking any chance it would have.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2017 20:42 |
|
The Browns and 49ers don't play each other. If they bothgo 0-16, how is draft pick order decided in this scenario? Is it just strength of schedule or are there other factors involved?
|
# ? Oct 31, 2017 00:29 |
|
3 DONG HORSE posted:The Browns and 49ers don't play each other. If they bothgo 0-16, how is draft pick order decided in this scenario? Is it just strength of schedule or are there other factors involved? Reverse strength of schedule is the big one. As in whoever played the weaker schedule will get the higher pick. Because, you see, if you're shittier against shittier teams that means you're the worst. If that ties I think there might be a couple of more things but it doesn't go down to points scored or anything like that. It is relatively common for draft order to come down to a coin flip, as in it happens every third or fourth year for someone. I don't think it's happened for #1 overall though.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2017 00:33 |
|
Strength of schedule is the only tiebreaker in draft order, if it's tied at that then they just go to the coin flip.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2017 00:37 |
|
Ah I wasn't sure about that, thanks.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2017 00:41 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 10:21 |
|
Benne posted:Strength of schedule is the only tiebreaker in draft order, if it's tied at that then they just go to the coin flip. Yes and no. For two teams in different conferences, it's overall record -> strength of schedule (weaker schedule "wins") -> coin flip. If the two teams are in the same division, divisional tiebreakers are used after SoS. If they're in the same conference, conference tiebreakers are used. Division has 11 tiebreakers, conference has 10, with several criteria overlaping. (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_playoffs#Breaking_ties) iospace fucked around with this message at 00:45 on Oct 31, 2017 |
# ? Oct 31, 2017 00:43 |