Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

akadajet posted:

i wonder how apple feels about the unity drama right now since they went with them as their vr game engine partner.

I’m guessing unity is trying to get bought out

probably a combination of "this is between game devs and unity, we're just a distributor" and "when you say 'charge the distributor' you'd better not mean us"

with a little dash of "vr game engine partnerships can be spun up and down pretty fast if it comes to that"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

there's also "vr games are a tiny niche that we could throw away without even blinking as we are buried by piles of money from our 30% cut of merge mansion premium gem packs"

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
what "unity drama" we talking here

Twerk from Home
Jan 17, 2009

This avatar brought to you by the 'save our dead gay forums' foundation.

Beeftweeter posted:

what "unity drama" we talking here

They said they're going to start charging devs a fee every time someone installs a game.

Devs are furious.

Silver Alicorn
Mar 30, 2008

The game has only just b̶̰̤͛̆e̶͔̎̕g̸͉͋u̷̮̍ń̶̹
unity is going to start charging a "per installation" fee for any games made with the engine. they've also been really wishy washy about who pays (developer or distributor?) and how they're tracking installs

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
wtf? how would they even determine that? what if someone uninstalled and reinstalled it?

that's real stupid

Sniep
Mar 28, 2004

All I needed was that fatty blunt...



King of Breakfast
maybe they should just move to a microtransactions model where they charge on asset/texture/model loads while in game in fractions of a cent

...on the blockchain!

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005




[ASK] Me About OS/2 WARP
not that i'm trying to make this work or w/e, but if you wanted to make something work, maybe offer higher resolution stuff or framerate for a [higher] price? like 1080 is free but if you want 4k60 or w/e its a few bucks. idfk

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
even aside from what they’re actually doing, it’s a big problem that they’re forcing this on everyone who has ever used unity with no opt-out or renegotiation. if you released a unity game five years ago and its long tail is almost entirely burned out, and suddenly it gets rediscovered and gets a burst of new users, you now owe unity money

when asked how they would track installs and reinstalls, considering that on many platforms that may not even be possible, their answer was “we’ll buy user activity from data brokers and use that to estimate, then send you a bill for it, just trust us”

there are also reports that they’re offering to waive the fees if you replace competing ad libraries with their in-house one, which, lmao

Achmed Jones
Oct 16, 2004



Sagebrush posted:

i have a titanium spork that i keep in my bag so i don't have to get plastic utensils when i buy lunch.

my set has a knife, fork, spoon, and chopsticks. the extra weight is worth it.

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


Beeftweeter posted:

wtf? how would they even determine that? what if someone uninstalled and reinstalled it?

that's real stupid

they said that would count for 2 installs, and therefore 2 charges. then they said it would only count as one install but would count as 2 if it was installed on a new device. then they said games installed as part of a subscription service like xbox game pass, or apple arcade would have install fees charged to the distributor. so microsoft or apple. good luck with that.

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
well if they don't backtrack i have a feeling a lot less people are going to be using unity

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

Beeftweeter posted:

well if they don't backtrack i have a feeling a lot less people are going to be using unity

they have employees quitting over it

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

problem for apple is if they have a lot of 3rd party projects on unity that now won’t ship for the vision pro launch. most existing vr software is on unity.

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
oh sounds like they should use unreal engine

...hang on, i've got something coming into my earpiece here

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

unreal engine is just a flat percent of revenue and not some random poo poo that nobody did the math on:

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
lol "unity takes more than 100% of your revenue"? great system there

also that was also a reference to epic suing apple :colbert:

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

haveblue posted:

even aside from what they’re actually doing, it’s a big problem that they’re forcing this on everyone who has ever used unity with no opt-out or renegotiation. if you released a unity game five years ago and its long tail is almost entirely burned out, and suddenly it gets rediscovered and gets a burst of new users, you now owe unity money

also to be fair (to someone who doesn't deserve the benefit, but still), no you wouldn't. not unless you signed a new contract with them allowing for it for using their engine, anyway, and why the gently caress would anyone do that?

they can't just change the terms and say "pay us for this thing you never agreed to", that would get laughed out of court pretty much anywhere

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Beeftweeter posted:

also to be fair (to someone who doesn't deserve the benefit, but still), no you wouldn't. not unless you signed a new contract with them allowing for it for using their engine, they can't just change the terms and say "pay us for this thing you never agreed to", that would get laughed out of court pretty much anywhere

well. they are literally saying that thing at the moment and are acting as though they want to be laughed out of court

Twerk from Home
Jan 17, 2009

This avatar brought to you by the 'save our dead gay forums' foundation.

Beeftweeter posted:

lol "unity takes more than 100% of your revenue"? great system there

also that was also a reference to epic suing apple :colbert:

Battle of the Tims

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Beeftweeter posted:

also to be fair (to someone who doesn't deserve the benefit, but still), no you wouldn't. not unless you signed a new contract with them allowing for it for using their engine, anyway, and why the gently caress would anyone do that?

they can't just change the terms and say "pay us for this thing you never agreed to", that would get laughed out of court pretty much anywhere

you'd think that, but unity has had a lot of TOS changes over the years and some of the wording may have granted them the right to change your pay structure at will, including new recurring fees

it is unclear enough and there is enough money and big players involved that it's more likely to end up in court than not if unity doesn't back all the way down

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

hobbesmaster posted:

well. they are literally saying that thing at the moment and are acting as though they want to be laughed out of court

perhaps, but them sending you a bill would have exactly as much legitimacy as one of those spam invoice emails

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

haveblue posted:

you'd think that, but unity has had a lot of TOS changes over the years and some of the wording may have granted them the right to change your pay structure at will, including new recurring fees

it is unclear enough and there is enough money and big players involved that it's more likely to end up in court than not if unity doesn't back all the way down

i don't feel like looking up precedents or anything but i'm comfortable saying that's probably not legal

Achmed Jones
Oct 16, 2004



just because you write something into a contract doesn't make it legal/enforceable. they aren't magic spells. it's always really funny that people forget this. same goes with laws, see also gold fringe on flags etc

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

Achmed Jones posted:

just because you write something into a contract doesn't make it legal/enforceable. they aren't magic spells. it's always really funny that people forget this. same goes with laws, see also gold fringe on flags etc

can't tell if you're serious here because of that last bit but the first part is absolutely true, doubly so if you don't follow the rules around modification

Achmed Jones
Oct 16, 2004



...i know, beef. if writing something down automatically made it enforceable, that would mean that contracts were like magic spells. and they are not.

the people who think that there is no oversight to contracts are of a species with people who think that finding some nonsense about admiralty jurisdiction will magically make them not have to pay taxes

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
unity can go eat a bag of dog poops

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

Beeftweeter posted:

unity can go eat a bag of dog poops

unity the software is good. shame about the management

Progressive JPEG
Feb 19, 2003

wonder what usbc accessories will now work out of the box with iphones

like can i plug my usbc headphone amp in there, or the usbc "for android" flir camera, or the controller for my dji mini 2, etc

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


Progressive JPEG posted:

wonder what usbc accessories will now work out of the box with iphones

like can i plug my usbc headphone amp in there, or the usbc "for android" flir camera, or the controller for my dji mini 2, etc

the reporting so far from companies that have gotten preview devices to test on is there's no licensing or proprietary checks on the port, everything they've plugged into it has just worked. the one thing i have seen is backbone saying their usb-c controllers will need a firmware update before they work properly on a 15 which is probably more to do with apple's controller handling than the port itself.

i did enjoy some more podcast whining about the usb-c earpods supporting lossless audio while the airpods don't, like my dude wired headphones have supported lossless audio since the loving 90s this is easy poo poo.

njsykora fucked around with this message at 02:37 on Sep 17, 2023

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
i'm assuming it's the same as ipad. pretty much anything i've plugged into it worked, including a headphone amp/dac and several mirrorless cams

e: worth noting a lot of that poo poo worked with the old ipad usb 3 lightning camera connection kit on iphone too

Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 02:42 on Sep 17, 2023

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


yeah but there was some supposedly reliable leaker pushing that apple were going to keep the MFi licensing program going and only certified products would work, which kinda defeats the whole point of switching to a universal standard.

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
i mean, see the edit. just because something isn't MFi doesn't mean it won't work, it's just not guaranteed to

Last Chance
Dec 31, 2004

njsykora posted:

yeah but there was some supposedly reliable leaker pushing that apple were going to keep the MFi licensing program going and only certified products would work, which kinda defeats the whole point of switching to a universal standard.

apple rumors are often horse poo poo

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

Last Chance posted:

apple rumors are often horse poo poo

yeah but they also get a lot right somehow

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


Beeftweeter posted:

i mean, see the edit. just because something isn't MFi doesn't mean it won't work, it's just not guaranteed to

yeah but i don't think the program is continuing at all, more because apple can't rent seek on making usb-c stuff like they could on lightning and limiting what you could use would probably be a pr nightmare.

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

it’d be super dumb if their existing usb-c chargers couldn’t charge the new phones quickly

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

njsykora posted:

yeah but i don't think the program is continuing at all, more because apple can't rent seek on making usb-c stuff like they could on lightning and limiting what you could use would probably be a pr nightmare.

i guess i could see them keeping it going by certifying that certain things would absolutely work and if they don't you can get service at an apple store, or something, idk. they'd need to sweeten the deal somehow there or else only just the most credulous rubes would buy that stuff

but otoh maybe they've calculated that's not worth the cost. either way i think that's good, gatekeeping peripherals is horseshit

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
they might still need some kind of program for stuff the phone’s case has to mate with, like battery enclosures or those split game controllers. then leave it as the wild west for anything that just has a usbc cable sticking out


e: why does autocorrect want to capitalize Wild West

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

njsykora posted:

i kinda want the one they showed during the event that holds the phone sideways like an alarm clock

https://www.apple.com/shop/product/HPKW2ZM/A/twelve-south-fort%E9-for-magsafe-charger

literally why i got it. tim sent it to me free. thanks, tim

the base is nice and heavy the plastic bit is kinda chintzy but it looks nice and standby comes out monday

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply