Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Volcott posted:

Well at least they're not doing it in Nanking!

uhhhh

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Jose posted:

does china have free universal healthcare or a welfare state yet

no, but the state owns a lot of businesses and bernie sanders told me That's Socialism

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Taiwan not red = 1 like&subscribe

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
marxism right, theism wrong

simple as that folks

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Top City Homo posted:

excellent journalist

Julius Malema good

these are talking points from like 1967

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Karl Barks posted:

China's leadership's obsession with Marx is kind of Western centric, imo, they can do better

Marxism is a universal truth, actually

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

actually turning this into a chinese history thread while continuing to mock the financial times would be good

150 years ago some christians caused a rebellion in China that caused more death and displacement than the european theater of WWII but it didn't make it into western history books and has been erased from eastern ones

oops

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I was thinking of moving back to Taiwan but this midterm really makes me want to reconsider

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
you guys are kinda misunderstanding what communist party member means in china

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
does china's communist party have a modern left wing at all

I know there's some stalinist hardliners still clinging to life peppered here and there

but I don't think they have any fresh, contemporary communist thinkers

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I don't mean liberal reformer elements... China does need more personal freedom but it doesn't necessarily need western style liberal democracy with it. I just mean are there people looking to make education and healthcare free and well funded, worried about the growth of a billionaire class and looking to curb it, worried about worker empowerment in the workplace etc... any modern marxist/left thinkers who are worried about contemporary problems from that framework

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
that article is like a wet fart PSL.web article where some politician somewhere mentions socialism in a positive way and they decree that a new revolution has started, rinse and repeat every month or so

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747


this kind of stuff

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

cargo cult posted:

if it makes u feel any better i took two 400 lvl chinese history classes in collefe, got As in them and now i dont remember anything and now i dont even attempt to understand china. i also racistly struggle with Chinese names sometimes

its not racist to have trouble speaking a foreign language, relax

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
yeah what they said

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
yawn

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I'm excited for China to start lending money to UK after no deal. Will be cool to see the british isles part of a global empire again, even if this time as a colony

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

Xi Jiping is the de facto leader of the free democratic world order, the American-led capitalist order is a dictatorship, effectively dictating exploitation to every other country by the bourgeois based in Washington DC and New York. The Chinese vision of international order would be more democratic by giving every nation a greater say in how the world order is governed along with respect for sovereignty, freedom, and rights of exploited countries on the world stage.

Tell me more

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Deng pretty much doomed China to being an authoritarian capitalist state until the next bloody civil war can overthrow it.

There was a brief period in the 80s where China was getting pretty good but he squashed it.

He also arbitrarily made his hometown, a large city but in the middle of nowhere, a first tier city with special economic status on par with Beijing and Shanghai lol

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

LOL had the counter-revolutionaries/anti-party groups succeeded in the 1980s 1990s China would have being like 1990s Russia

90s russia happened because western economists were emboldened by the "polish miracle" and decided to heartlessly experiment with the livelihood of a hundred million people.

There were plenty of political thinkers in China asking for more worker control, freedom, and democracy (not meaning western liberal republic style government but rule by the people). They were not looking for social experiments or foreign experts.

Deng had every potential to set a path for a more democratic and free China but instead decided that the future was in the party's hands, not the nation or the people.

What do you think about Kronstadt?

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Gorbachev was right that socialism needed reform, and I think he was right to address the obvious problems and flaws the USSR had created.

He incredible misshandling of his reforms lead to his coup and I don't think you can say that 1980s china was in an identical position... if anything after the gang of four was removed China was for a moment open to a lot of possibilities and they also chose a regretful path.

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Fallen Hamprince posted:

I'll note that Marx formulated this theory in the 19th century before environmentalism became a big thing; IMO it's more likely that industrial society collapses due to lack of resources or catastrophic environmental change than any intrinsic long-term trend in capitalist political economy.

Marx was actually interested in all the systems of accumulation and wrote about how Capitalism placing so many humans into cities disrupts the nutrient cycle i.e. we take nutrition from the soil, feed the people in the city, and it washes down the river and out to sea, leaving the system. Of course modern petrochemicals and bioscience means we can add it back in but it's pretty incredible Marx of all people was the first to think of this problem.

It's also really interesting that on this kinda marxist forum most people don't get past the Crisis, Falling Profit, Blah Blah thing of Marx. Him and Engles really fuckin' owned at analyzing social systems to a level no one has even gotten close to and most of it will be an important consideration in what the hell to do after capitalism

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 23:18 on Jan 2, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

A really fascinating point of comparative politics is to contrast The August coup of 1991 vs Tienanmen Square of 1989, and why one regime collapsed while the other didn't and the consequences of each.

lol how are these anything alike other than Famous Foreign Event

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

both are the direct consequences of trying to reform the Socialist states which were built up in the immediate post-war era

in both cases you had a reformist general secretary (Zhao Ziyang/Gorbachev) out of line with rest of the party besieged by hardliners

in both cases you had crowds gathered in the capital in support of radical reformers, and the hardliners sitting in the halls of power

on a more abstract level, in both cases it was the contradictions between Marxist-Leninism and recent policy reforms came to head literally in the public square and threaten the regime's existence. In one of the them the party ordered the tanks to open fire on the crowd to resolve that particular contradiction, in the other they waffled. Why and how the decisions were made to suppress/vs surrender to the crowd is rather informative. The consequences of those decisions is still felt to this day and will be for the next 50 years at least.

This is kinda a stretch when the tanks were pointing in completely opposite directions in these two events

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
It's like extremely bad analysis to say that normal people coming to the halls of power for various reasons and being run over by military hardware

is the same as Yeltsin standing on a tank and then a coup attempt shooting into the parliament

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 23:56 on Jan 2, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Tiananmen square is also a "first as farce, then as tragedy" situation when Deng himself orchestrated a protest in the square 15 years prior to the more famous event, following the death of Zhou Enlai. People were questioning the direction of the government and asking for reforms. The precedent of protesting in the square and using the "Democracy Wall" to air grievances were, in 1989, well established, in fact Deng was placed on house arrest explicitly for supporting their use.

When Hu Yaobang died and several student movements met in the square, a completely organic protest of exactly the same type Deng had previously orchestrated against his enemies was squashed with martial force. Few (none?) were calling for the end of the Chinese Communist Party's rule or a even change in leadership, just a change in the direction of the development of Chinese society.

Deng Xiaoping sucks and it's too bad a billion people are brainwashed into thinking he does not, in fact, suck

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Fuligin posted:

his point (i think) is that the very attempt to reform precipitated a crisis of the old order. having now successfully contained or erased popular demand for reform, and witnessed the SU's spectacular collapse and russia's diminished state, i'm sure that most of the ccp think tiananmen square was crushed appropriately. xi's strange contortions between gung-ho savior of international trade (and the capitalist order it perpetuates) and maoist nostalgia and red values is a response to perceived constraints.he faces the problem of what to do with a capitalist sector that is important to enrich the country/increase national self-sufficiency but which simultaneously perpetuates inequality and erodes party authority and discipline. One party rule, with its opacity, factionalism, and sheer sprawl, is deeply vulnerable to corruption and crony capitalism
btw this is not a gimmick post
btw btw xi of course is a direct benefactor from the ccp's undemocratic and clubby nature so that doesnt help either lol


btw btw btw i assume these screengrabs are in reference to recent tax reform, which was actually well thought out and good for working people

Are you talking about the very Communist thing he did raising the tax rate on the wealthy from 25% to 45% overnight. Or the funny thing that china has an essentially flat tax for anyone living in a city so everyone got hosed really hard.

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

Of course, poster Modest Mao first unironically perpetuate propaganda brought by the anti-party gang of four (the leader of which admitted she never understood Maoism while beguiling Mao and responsible for his 30% bad) against Deng over 1976 and then unironically perpetuate propaganda against the party

The Chinese leadership acknowledged that most of the students had legitimate demands, but at the same time, had proof that "bad elements" within the protests were directed by USA, Taiwan, and Hong Kong to use and manipulate protests as a "command center" for a final showdown against the party, annihilate socialism, destroy Chinese sovereignty, and return colonialism. While not mentioning that 95% of protests in 1989 were diffused peacefully and protesters went home satisfied that the government will change for the better. While not mentioning at all that Marxist-Leninist-Dengism brought more people out of poverty than any other country in history and continues to guide China's advancement into 21st century socialism. This is the sort of social fascism that must be struggled against.

this is really gross behavior

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Typo posted:

I don't think we are even talking about the same coup, the coup you are thinking of is the 1993 Russian constitutional crisis which occurred after the USSR fell, that's distinct from the 1991 August coup which precipitated the fall of the USSR

You're right my brain merged parts of those events in a very confusing way

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

is this postmodernism?

It's literally marginal utility economic theory laid bare

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

sincx posted:

Lmao, the China thread in the Unnamed Forum is once again just sexpats defending their Asian fetishes. Modest Mao is very angry that the local guys aren't willing to facilitate his sexpating.

I literally don't have sex (incel)

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

tino posted:

Taiwan doesn't have high tech stuff to steal.

huh

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
oh you mean it's already been stolen or what

edit: that post is very ignorant and it upsets me

literally just today 6 people were arrested after being paid 1 million each to leak tech info to China

https://www.ft.com/content/e8cf1de0-1274-11e9-a581-4ff78404524e

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 01:46 on Jan 8, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

The Great Autismo! posted:

I thought serpentza was married to a chinese woman and that modest Mao lived in Taiwan with his Taiwanese girlfriend

I really don't think what these people are saying is "mainland women won't have sex with me!" that's a heck of a decoder ring you got there

I mean serpentza's wife makes videos on his account, just search "serpentza wife" on youtube, it took like two seconds. I don't think he's really all that fussed about girls not having sex with him

I work in media (photographer/cinematographer) so I gotta travel a lot, I've been based in Taiwan and L.A. The party I missed that sincx is obsessed with was an industry thing, media people just hanging out and I'd be there to make business connections & have fun. I'm probably the least sex-patty guy.

It's extremely easy to gently caress over foreign people who are in China temporarily for a job. I've invested basically my entire adult life in my career in Asia. In LA speaking mandarin is a novelty.

It actually really blows to be so vulnerable but I guess it's funny cause I'm white and historically it is the Chinese people's turn to be racists.

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 06:41 on Jan 9, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
They are probably nervous about being a bad host with a foreigner or a million other minor things but you're just afraid of race mixing. Projecting that into every social situation is pretty cool!

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I kinda think there's another thread for the foreign male experience in China. It's a little interesting that people can go to jail for weeks for posts they make in small private chat groups but this thread is better suited for more less trivial subjects that whiteness abroad.

Also your obsession with interracial couples is bordering /r/hapa

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 20:04 on Jan 10, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

sincx posted:

I think the biases, racist tendencies, and hidden motives of the "foreign white male," who are almost the exclusive source of English-language news about and discourse regarding China, is a very relevant topic for this thread.

E.g.: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/18/sexpat-journalists-are-ruining-asia-coverage/

uhhhh I don't think anyone gives a poo poo about this.

This article has some interesting stuff, definitely. But her opening example of sexpat is foreign men in China trying to rape a Canadian journalist. I think you really need some self reflection about why you find this topic so fascinating.

Modest Mao has issued a correction as of 20:34 on Jan 10, 2019

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
The journalism article you posted is a lot more on topic. You're taking things from the white expat experience thread and bringing them into the China politics thread in a weird and obsessive way.

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Yeah but you have ulterior motives, clearly. Maybe I'm just creeped out because you're following me around the forums in a not-gimmick-poster way.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Darkman Fanpage posted:

oh cool this thread has become like the gbs one where all the weird goons that went to china and hated it talk about how much they hate china

Actually China owns

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply