|
If he out I'm in so I can ruin the all star cast
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jan 18, 2021 05:08 |
|
|
Wait am I playing or does no one like me or both?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
I didn’t either. RF certainly has lost a step
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
Actually it’s CC, he said he would be mean in his first case
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
I need more proof before I’ll vote asiina
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
Guys I am starting to doubt CC’s claim. I think he’s just a d0 cop and not a self watcher bulletproof
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
flerp posted:keane wouldnt lie Hmm the only way you would know is if you knew Asiina’s role and actions hmmm
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I never claimed bulletproof...how would you know...unless you tried to kill me? How else would you be able to survive Asiina visited you if she’s scum? Bad case bad player.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
GeneX posted:I already soft-claimed jesus by saying I was jewish in this christmas themed game, so yes, 100% Time for hamfistedly telling people you are VT is over ##vote genesus Christ
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Monathin posted:Check up is doctor softclaim, cmon, get it together A visiting doctor? Sounds like a poisoner
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:And with this, jokephase is over. I think you’ll find gene is much more insidious
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Bus the new guy!!!????
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
bus the new guy who isn’t really new but would like a newbie pass
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Bus the new guy who rolled over and offered to claim as soon as he had one (1) vote on him
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Mona come back I want to chat and then murder you
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Busssss!?! (it’s when scum try to lynch each other for town cred)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Oh I didn’t know Mona voted you I thought it was only CC
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
Gene I meant gene voted you
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
Hello Mona do you think gene is scum
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
Mona you have my permission to vote the scum named gene
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:This is a misrepresentation. He said: I misread it, but I also definitely was trying to raise suspicion on him and really didn’t try to read it carefully
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
Monathin posted:I dunno if Gene is scum but first to vote + obviously targetting the odd duck out reads to me as something that could fly under the radar easily while theoretically scoring an easy D1 mislynch. It reads to me as an awkward entrance by scum who is voting for someone that they can safely switch off of.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:YPM why are you picking on new players. That's not very christmasy of you I hate them
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:YPM’s “I wasn’t really reading his content well because I just wanted to make him look susp” isn’t sitting great with me. I didn’t say I wanted to make him look suspicious. I said that I want to put suspicion on him because, get this, it’s loving day 1 and I don’t know who is scum so I gotta yell a bit about nothing until something happens. You know this. What do you think about Gene?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Monathin posted:Hey YPM while the shoe is on the other foot: why did you think Gene was suspicious if you hadnt read him voting me at the start of the day? His casual mention of being vanilla town. It read forced.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Yeah, that is a very odd phrase. I wasn’t trying to make a case (meaning, trying to convince others to lynch him). I was trying to put pressure on him to see how he responded.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
Hi flerp. If you refuse to latch yourself to Mona’s airtight case involving Gene’s inexcusable confusion over fake sports leagues, is there anyone you would like us to brutally murder
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 21:50
|
|
|
Quid. Everyone makes everything out of nothing on day 1. You are barking up the wrong tree and it’s weird. Me not having much of a case is like surface level scummy but if you think about it for two seconds you realize that it’s day 1 and it’s either this or no lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
What the gently caress is an RVS
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
What if quid is the scum how crazy
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:I’d love for you to case me instead of continuing to prove my case regarding you throwing poo poo to see what sticks Okey dokies. You know better. You know how day 1 works. You really think that I’m going to have a slam dunk case on Gene? Like do you really think that I would believe in my heart of hearts Gene is scum because he hamfistedly mentioned vanilla town? I thought it was minor evidence, but minor evidence was all I had just like every town ever on day one barring role madness games. I make a mountain out of that mole hill, someone attacks that mole hill, someone attacks that person for attacking that mole hill, and someone eventually does something of substance enough that a real case is born. I am just more open about what I’m doing than others. Same with Hal. You “caught” Hal with a limpwristed contradiction. You can look at it for two seconds and say “hmm flerp also said something positive about Gene’s response” and perhaps conclude that Hal was impressed by the temerity of Gene’s response instead of the substance, which is basically what Hal said. My point is you aren’t looking for scum. You are looking for a case, surface level scummy behavior that you, as potential scum, could hang your hat on and pretend to be scumhunting. And if you were a newbie, it would be one thing, but you’ve been part of a bunch of day ones and know how it goes. Yet you specifically and, I would say, deliberately, tried to derail the pressure on Gene while admitted that you only tangentially read the pressure on him. It demonstrates no thought in your posting or your hunting, just searching for out of context bits that you can use to pretend to case someone despite knowing their alignment.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:11
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:That doesn’t even make sense. You are in the same breath defending yourself for poking at people to see how it snowballs, then calling me potential scum for doing what, by your account, seems to be the exact same behavior. If you were just doing what I was doing, and not, say, trying to find an easy target, why did you jump on me for it? If I was mirroring your behavior, I would have thrown shade at CC for casing a poor newbie
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Because I don’t see you offering any real opinions. There’s a difference between asking everyone what they think of other people while throwing out broad suspicions (what I see you doing) and asking people you are suspicious of to explain their actions (where I started) and then moving in to opinions on case. The latter is grounded in your OWN thoughts and feelings; the former just looks like faking it. First of all, how would I possibly have real opinions at that point? How do you possibly have real opinions at this point? You yell and complain and see how people react and the get real opinions. The idea that you expect anyone to have any hard opinions is ridiculous The difference is you didn’t show your work. You wrote down the answer (that I was being scummy) without even thoroughly reading what was going on. I don’t have hard opinions right now, and the fact that you have hard opinions doesn’t show a real conclusion on your part. Hell, the fact that you think it’s possible or good to have hard opinions right now shows you are removed from the town mindset.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Maybe we just play D1 differently? I’m having a hard time believing you are writing all this with genuine intent. I’ve never seen you get on, say, Inf for being 100% certain he was right about reading someone based on a tangential gut read, at least not in a format that caused you to write five paragraphs about it. I’ve gotten on Inf plenty of times. The game that I recently played with him that I didn’t really get on him were special circumstances where I wanted him to think I was scum so I was super buddying up to him. Unfortunately it worked on everyone but him. Like I’ve been called scum in every game because I’m aggressive. I have become uninterested in brutally murdering you
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Why? Because it read as town defending his play style rather than scum defending his alignment.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:So are you saying you can’t form any opinions on anyone until you engage them directly or something? I really want to ask you who you think are scum right now but I am getting the feeling you’re gonna be all “too early for opinions,” and I think you can see why that’s frustrating and suspicious. I think Gene is scum due to his forced posting which is why I voted him. I don’t have any other scum reads. Quid, one day you’ll realize that I yell and batter at people in good faith
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
GeneX posted:That sure was a slapfight over D1 pressuring people for the sake of mediocre reads, yup. You continue to amaze
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Okay I will do this. Yes, I was saying we would no lynch otherwise. No lynching is bad that's my opinion I hope you like it
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 05:05
|
|
|
Also what does biting off way more than I can handle even mean? Mona are you scum after I decided not to murder you?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jan 18, 2021 05:08 |
|
|
Asiina posted:Right but are you saying it's either a bad case or no lynch OR your bad case or no lynch? A bad case or no lynch. All day 1 cases are bad.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 05:44
|
|