|
Oh yeah I guess it could be PGO. And I'm back on NGO with no case because nothing happened to change my mind since the case I made yesterday
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 21:06 |
|
|
SalTheBard posted:So 2 posts is your whole case? I said your posts in general but yeah.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Oh yeah I guess it could be PGO. oh yes your case, this one? Retro Futurist posted:See now that's interesting. NGO hated my gimmick so much that she wanted me out of the game for it, but now she's mad that I didn't commit enough. where I thought posting spackit over and over is stupid and then thought you were weak for not committing to it? you gotta commit to a bit my friend, that's what comedy is all about
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
Yes that one
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:It’s day 2 and we are already talking about a pgo. Makes sense... Either: A. Scum visited a PGO and got got B. Scum visited someone who was protected in some capacity and failed their kill. A Vigilante got lucky and nailed scum or an SK just killed someone at random and it happened to be scum. So doesn't seem far-fetched to me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
I don't know about NGO, but the meta case on tone difference against sal is weak, but I don't know if that paints them as a scumbo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
The case on Sal is bad but it actually makes me feel ok about NGO
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
I mean I'm sure they got stuff going on, but monathin and asiina both are suss to me. Asiina more just the lack of anything. Monathin the joke vote close to deadline. *chin rubbing intensifies*
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
same for stone cold I suppose on lack of anything, but that could just be ~things~
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
Venom Soag posted:Occam’s razor, maybe closer to a PGO. Maybe this is confirmation bias but I really don’t like this post. The first sentence reads like scum who knows the action of Bird and is saying something to seemingly contribute. The second sentence is pure hypocrisy since he had just accused Inf of bussing with no backup case.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
Going to back off the "no content" cases for now because there are a few, but given how long this day is I'd like to see something. Admittedly probably will just be phone checking mostly through weekend, but I'll be here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Aha caught one ##vote ngo I'm not sure I understand the gotcha on this one. Also if your case against NGO is that they were wishy washy about your joke phase gimmick then that's a bad case. Definitely not something to double down on in light of scum getting NK'd, imo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:24
|
|
|
Actually, that seems real donkeybrained to me. ##vote RF
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Yes that one That case is even worse than my case on sal which is admittedly bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:That case is even worse than my case on sal which is admittedly bad NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Based on sal’s posting yesterday I believe he’s scum. Case forthcoming NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Nah you're scum. Do me a favor and explain the apparent discrepancy of confidence between these two bottom posts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'm not sure I understand the gotcha on this one. Also if your case against NGO is that they were wishy washy about your joke phase gimmick then that's a bad case. Definitely not something to double down on in light of scum getting NK'd, imo. I have no idea what that has to do with anything
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Do me a favor and explain the apparent discrepancy of confidence between these two bottom posts. Just because I don't have the eloquence or wherewithal to make an effective case doesn't make my belief any weaker it just means I'm bad at making a case. As my mafia hero (flerp) says u gotta follow yr heart
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I have no idea what that has to do with anything Great deflection, mate. 10/10. It just seems to me, that doubling down on that case has nothing to do with the actual unfolding content of the game. Seems like something weird to hone in on lol.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Just because I don't have the eloquence or wherewithal to make an effective case doesn't make my belief any weaker it just means I'm bad at making a case. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Great deflection, mate. 10/10. It just seems to me, that doubling down on that case has nothing to do with the actual unfolding content of the game. I talked about the NK, but we don't actually know anything about it so I'm not sure how it's supposed to affect my thoughts on NGO. I'm not trying to deflect I legit have no idea what you're trying to say
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
it's me
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'm not sure I understand the gotcha on this one. Also if your case against NGO is that they were wishy washy about your joke phase gimmick then that's a bad case. Definitely not something to double down on in light of scum getting NK'd, imo. yeah
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I talked about the NK, but we don't actually know anything about it so I'm not sure how it's supposed to affect my thoughts on NGO. I'm not trying to deflect I legit have no idea what you're trying to say I get that the logic in calling out your case in light of the NK isn't the best, but I feel that my point about your case overall being poorly developed and not on anything concrete still stands as its own argument. I feel like you are avoiding addressing the points about your case on NGO being bad. Explain your aha vote, and subsequent conviction please.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Don’t like rf or sal but is my judgement clouded by omgus?
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Don’t like rf or sal but is my judgement clouded by omgus? I mean your case on sal is still bad  I just personally think RF looks worse, but also feel like maybe just being obtuse unintentionally??? Not sure... more convinced on RF. Also suss of the no content players who should POST OR DIE. (not literally, that would be terrible <3)
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
I'll ## unvote for now, we have 2 days
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
looking over the votes and such on D1 and I just don't have much hope that Sal is a nice person. ##vote SalTheBard
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I get that the logic in calling out your case in light of the NK isn't the best, but I feel that my point about your case overall being poorly developed and not on anything concrete still stands as its own argument. It is what it is. Make a better case if you want
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
I would never bus a scumbro D1. D2 onwards maybe ##vote SOAG
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
While i agree with muse and his concern toward ngo, i dont think sal is the vote or is scum. Everything I'm seeing from him is lining up the same as when he was town in the prior few games I've played with him. I think he's a guy who just comes off super scummy with his regular gameplay as a result of his general timidity and fear to go into heavy cases where he could ve put in a visible light.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:looking over the votes and such on D1 and I just don't have much hope that Sal is a nice person. At what point was I rude?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
are you always this dense?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:I would never bus a scumbro D1. D2 onwards maybe Weak. Weaker still for being an OMGUS.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
I am not getting scum vibes from sal
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Actually, friend, I think NGO is town, as his bad case on Sal reads as NGO thinking the case on Sal was gangbusters and then going back and realizing it wasn’t I assure you this makes sense in my head
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
Wait how did my post get screwed up
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
God drat phone posting
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
I'm voting NGO. The weak accusation against me and considering at one point they had 3 or 4 votes D1 makes me think they are trying to flip the vote away from them (scum team) and force a lynch on a townie (me). I think Zetsuba is the scumbro trying also make a generally weak case for voting for me. ##vote NGO
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:My vote isn't going to matter today, Mon still needs 2. ##vote Monathin but I'm a team player so whatever that is the most worthless post in this thread even considering anidav
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 21:06 |
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:that is the most worthless post in this thread I felt pressured to vote, Monathin was still two votes down and there was literally like 5 minutes left of the day. If I said something you thought was rude I really do apologize. I enjoy playing mafia. I played in a DBZ game that got heated so I would like to avoid that here but I understand how it happens.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 06:11
|
|