|
SPACKIT!
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 02:08 |
|
|
b-minus1 posted:^^^^NOOOO. Well I guess I'll choose KOWAKKA lol 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
SPACKIT!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
SPACKIT!?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:The beaver conspiracy is clearly at work here. SPACKIT! 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:Spackit SPAACCCKIITTT!!!1! 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
Aha caught one ##vote ngo
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 04:33
|
|
|
No i was just having fun before
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
See now that's interesting. NGO hated my gimmick so much that she wanted me out of the game for it, but now she's mad that I didn't commit enough.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
Haha nice
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 04:57
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:So you think the scum team decided to nightvig one of their own to build town cred? I think this, actually. I mean the alternative is that a vig/SK got lucky and hit scum, AND scum went after a BP/doc got lucky. It's too perfect a storm for my tastes and I suspect fuckery. That said, ##vote NGO not sure how we got off track yesterday
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Oh yeah I guess it could be PGO. And I'm back on NGO with no case because nothing happened to change my mind since the case I made yesterday
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
Yes that one
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'm not sure I understand the gotcha on this one. Also if your case against NGO is that they were wishy washy about your joke phase gimmick then that's a bad case. Definitely not something to double down on in light of scum getting NK'd, imo. I have no idea what that has to do with anything
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Great deflection, mate. 10/10. It just seems to me, that doubling down on that case has nothing to do with the actual unfolding content of the game. I talked about the NK, but we don't actually know anything about it so I'm not sure how it's supposed to affect my thoughts on NGO. I'm not trying to deflect I legit have no idea what you're trying to say
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I get that the logic in calling out your case in light of the NK isn't the best, but I feel that my point about your case overall being poorly developed and not on anything concrete still stands as its own argument. It is what it is. Make a better case if you want
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
I'll flip to Soag if I have to but I'd rather people just do what I say.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
##vote Soag
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2017 05:39
|
|
|
Ok so does anyone have anything useful to say or can we kill NGO for being scum now?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2017 03:42
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:what are your thoughts on Anomalous Amalgam, who wanted to kill you yesterday Not great, given their boneheaded reasons for voting me and the fact that it looks like they were still on me when we no lynched
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:RF's case is essentially that NGO was noncommittal about being annoyed with his jokephase SPACKIT gimmick.  Neither of those things are true.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:can't wait to hear this one 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 19:04
|
|
|
You know sure, you got me. Let's kill NGO today and when she flips scum you can go ahead and kill me tomorrow.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
Yes. After NGO flips scum and we kill me, then go after AA next.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:In that case I have no idea what he is talking about. The post directly before that, the one you were responding to
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
I'm not sold on Zeb
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:Just trying to figure out rfs strange posts. Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm a jester
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:I know that. You are absolutely convinced ngo is scum? Pretty much
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
##vote NGO I'd rather get this day over with. If we go into next week without a lynch we might as well throw in the towel
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
Or me, we could also just kill me so I'm free, either or. NGO, Thunderdome.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
Town
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:Then why would I vote you? Personally, I'd recommend voting for NGO who is scum
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
Inf was clearly lying. Like to a degree where I don't feel like he was actually attempting subterfuge
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 07:05
|
|
|
Nah
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 07:11
|
|
|
I don’t get what inf is doing. At no point has he been believeable and can’t possibly expect anyone to believe him, so I don’t see it as a bluff, but he’s also clearly lying so?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
Venom Soag posted:Best case scenario is he’s convinced I’m scum and is doing this as an all-out attempt to get me lynched. I’m going to go with that + trying to make something, anything happen
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 05:14
|
|
|
Huh. That's a surprising kill choice and an even more surprising flip.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
Anyways, Inf, are you: 1) a loving idiot townie who thought that was a good plan, or 2) a loving idiot scum who miscounted when LYLO was?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
And here's NGO with the out of the gates vote on MYLO ##vote NGO
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 02:08 |
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:RF, how did you know Inf was lying? He acted like you are supposed to as a cop who doesn’t want to draw a nightkill. And please don’t respond with “it was obvious” because it wasn’t to me and I’m not a complete idiot. I mean I really don't have an answer that you're going to like here, man.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2017 16:14
|
|