Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

zoux posted:

Oooh wee Time magizines review

I'm not sure she actually watched the show.

It doesn't even make sense the way she frames it, since whitewashing traditionally means taking a minority role from the source material and giving it to a more palatable, white actor. She's just following a knee jerk script.

That's bad, but not quite as lazy as the reviewers complaining that the show exploits violence against women.

I'm only 6 episodes in, but the gendered body count has got to be at least 25 to 1, and the one protracted torture scene has a male-bodied victim, in an intentional change from the book.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

zoux posted:

The most laughable thing imo is saying they don't explore the ethical implications of stacks/re-sleeving/immortality, and is why I don't think she watched it.

My favorite show addition along those lines is the total nonchalance of the hospital receptionist to the character with poor credit bleeding to death in front of her. The kind of thing that would come across as a trying-too-hard-for-edgy parody of modern norms in another work, but is here totally fitting and plausible when you consider the implications of stacks.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Basticle posted:

I'm avoiding reading this thread so I go in completely blind but question about episode 4:

Who was the dissected woman in the room while Kovacs got tortured and what was the purpose of taking out all of her organs like that?

she was the prostitute that he asked to ask around, who injected him with tranquilizers when he came back. Organs are a valuable commodity.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Neddy Seagoon posted:

Speaking of that stupid tower, could they have gotten any less subtle about Meths "looking down on people"? :cripes:


Yeah, somewhere between the meth turning a poor person into a pet snake for show-and-tell and the basement fight to death between poor people, I thought Netflix got a little carried away with that sequence.


Spatula City posted:

Everything is ludicrously on-the-nose in this series, it's kind of great. If there's any complaints I have about it, it's that it sort of loses the plot of the Bancroft mystery, and then belatedly remembers to wrap it up.

Also, jfc Kovacs' sister is just a complete irredeemable demon shitbird.

instead of Kovacs's sister, her backstory in the book was that she was a 'water carrier', a Yakuza enforcer that would go to the homes of debtors with a lead flask of recycled coolant water from reactors and force them to drink it in front of their families. She's proud of this.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

nessin posted:


1) The government prosecutor would have cut a deal to forgo prosecution and announced to the public that he'd been arrested, made his plea, and was receiving a slap on the wrist thanks to the contributions he made in the other cases. Also it's hard to say how serious some of his crimes are, for example is double sleeving actually that illegal or just so taboo it's talked about like it. The only real major crime, explicit in the show, I can think of is the stuff in the clinic but if we assume he was good at his job then there probably isn't any connection between him and clinic. Only Ortega and her partner knew that.


I think its less that he was good about cleaning up his fingerprints and more that the clinic was doing so much illegal poo poo that they wouldn't want detectives anywhere near the crime scene. The book is also more explicit about the fact that Kovacs has not one but two meths (Bancroft and Rei) spending a small fortune in cash and influence to keep him out of jail during his investigation.

And double sleeving is super illegal, punished by mandatory erasure. I think the only other crime they mention that gets that is unauthorized possession of a viral WMD.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Strom Cuzewon posted:

Book spoilers: Not sure she's the one who specifies Tak. I think Bancroft finds him of his own accord. I might be wrong.

Importantly, Tak is less of a big deal in the books. The Envoy's are the elite strike forces of the protectorate, and rogue Envoys that can be hired by the super-rich are a dime a dozen.

She does specifically recommend Takeshi to Bancroft, because she knows that Bancroft will take an Envoy's findings seriously and she can force Takeshi to punt the investigation by holding his lover Sarah (woman killed in episode 1) hostage and threatening to put her in VR hell.

Takeshi and Reileen are not related in the book, their prior relationship is that they worked together on another world, probably to stamp out a rebellion or install a new government.

The main role of Envoys is not really super-soldiering, but what Takeshi calls "regime engineering." They are master manipulators, lacking in compassion, and have intuition-bordering-on-ESP. I think Kovacs even reflects on the fact that this incidentally makes them supreme detectives.

I don't think it's said explicitly, but it makes sense that hiring a jailed ex-Envoy from hundreds of light years away would appeal to Bancroft's vanity in a way that hiring a local gumshoe would not.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Kegslayer posted:


In the book Quellcrist isn't anti technology but flat out anti Protectorate because she believes that they're the ones holding humanity back.

The books point to capitalism and fundamentalism (like Islam) being the main issue. It's basically the system that is broken and in some way, even the rich assholes at the top are unable to break out of their gilded cages. Kovacs is all about smashing revolutions and deriding the leadership of a revolution but at the same time, there are certain places where he does want to smash the state and bring out the guillotine.

Especially with how the trilogy ends, power by itself isn't seen to be a problem.

You could give society infinite technological power and a capitalist society will stay right where they are building centralised power structures on the ruins of the old. The rich and powerful will continue to enrich themselves before they all just stagnate while a, I don't know you'd call it but a socialist/transhuman society will use those same powers and go out exploring into the stars, build wormholes, discover FTL travel etc.


Quellcrist is explicitly pro-stack technology, IIRC. Considers it a vital tool of the revolution.

An annoying pattern I've noticed with TV/Hollywood sci-fi is a knee-jerk tendency to brand any technology that makes someone superhuman, especially immortal, as coming at a terrible cost. Immortals always wish they could get cancer and die miserably after 70 years, so that "their life would have meaning". It's almost like writers feel the need to reassure viewers that superhuman characters are actually worse off.

I liked BSG a lot at first because it seemed to eschew this- the Cylons reveled in the fact that they were effectively immortal and all of the advantages that came with it. And then they hit season 4 and bam, Cylons nobly sacrifice their immortality so that their lives could be short and meaningful.

So one of the things that I liked about Altered Carbon was that the protagonist not only embraces the technology the way most of us would any medical advance, but views people who reject it for themselves as naive and people who reject it for others as despicable.

It was disappointing if unsurprising that they made Kovacs ultimately go (slightly) antivaxxer just like all the others.

quote:

[spoiler]
Are they even going to bring this stuff in? The show seems to have made a deliberate choice in cutting a lot of the Protectorate and the alien stuff out in favour of just focusing on the technology. It's a pretty big jump to go from a noir story to the next two books about [spoiler]aliens or space wars

I'm disappointed that they cut a lot of the world building stuff but found room for side plots I didn't care about, like Elliot's and Ortega's families. Although skinhead grandma was amazing.


In fairness though, as much as I liked the sequels, that genre jump was pretty jarring for the books too. I wouldn't mind if they just stuck with the cyberpunk noir instead, provided Morgan was involved.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

pile of brown posted:

Not really a spoiler but stacks being Martian technology really fucks with a plot point from a later book, although now that I type this they hosed with that book in a more significant way already.

How so? I've read the sequels and I don't know what you're referencing.

Gyges posted:

His entire plan is to save his sister by using the available tech to give her a couple centuries time out, forcing her to once again be "normal". The overriding push of the show is that the tech isn't actually a problem, it's money and power that corrupt. The Meths are bad not because they're immortal, it's because they're immoral.

"Slightly", because I meant his backstory, where they made the Quellists anti-immortality.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Zaphod42 posted:

This show has great ideas for all of its awkward ones.

Specifically, the awkward ideas mostly come from the adaptation and the great ideas mostly come from the source, with the notable exception of skinhead grandma.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Phi230 posted:

The flashback made the Envoys into YA novel levels of uncool

I was wincing through that entire episode, and YA novel is a perfect characterization.

Maybe I missed it in the all the wincing, but was there ever any grounded explanation for why Quell is basically Neo? Like shooting guns out of people's hands, catching knives with her back turned, rewriting VR rules from inside the simulation? Did they just bring in an edgy 14-year-old to write that episode?

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

dead comedy forums posted:

honestly I really want to know why the gently caress netflix shows don't just drop but go into freefall after 6 or 7 episodes

ReileenI am curious to know how it develops in the book, because it was such a hard switch that I went wtf considering all the plot points that were presented so far.

Don't know if you've been following the thread, but Kovacs's and Reileen's familial connection, her insane, incestuous jealousy of Ortega/Quell, and her plot-convenient idiocy are all products of the adaptation.

Book Reileen had a brief, previous professional relationship with Kovacs. She manipulates Bancroft to bring him in because she knows she can force him to abort the investigation, and once he does what she wants she pretty much loses all interest in him until he shows up pointing a gun in her face.


Like most of the other posters, I'm fine with them making major changes and even prefer it, as long as it's logically-consistent. I got bored with GoT season 1 because it was so true to the first book that I knew everything that was going to happen.

But a lot of the "logic on vacation" moments in the second half of AC are the result of the show writers overhauling the book motivation of characters but not their book actions, causing a lot of painful incongruities that they tried to gloss over in the last 3 episodes.

e.g. Reileen having closely watched Kovacs through a series of minor characters would have been a neat episode-ender, except that it made no loving sense given that her self-proclaimed reason for bringing him to Earth was to reunite with him and he had every reason to love and trust her upon his arrival before her henchmen nearly killed him 8 times and he stumbled on her child snuff ring.

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

Tiggum posted:


Actually this made me think of something; what was the reason Reileen needed Bancroft to bring Takeshi back? Why couldn't she just do that herself if that was her end goal? Why hadn't she already done it years ago? There was the UN vote issue as well, but I don't think that was connected, except that she apparently thought it would be more convenient to combine her two goals into one overly complicated plan?

A charitable explanation would be that Reileen doesn't have quite enough pull, but Bancroft does.

Probably more accurately, it's because all of her pre-episode 8 actions are consistent with book Reileen, who has no personal attachment to Kovacs whatsoever and whose entire goal is getting Bancroft to punt the bill.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Avasculous
Aug 30, 2008

404notfound posted:

Seriously, I just finished episode 10 and started reading more about the series on the internet (doing so before finishing is just asking to get spoiled), and it seems like this thread has already reached off-season status.

1 week after release = off-season seems about right for a 10-episode Netflix series.

  • Locked thread