|
I'm up for this!
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2018 17:00
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 04:44 |
|
|
Do I need to understand DBZ to play? I never watched it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
Deelop #4594
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2018 00:33
|
|
|
Bagsy jumping in the power up chamber first, I wanna get my swole on and start yelling about my power levels
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2018 03:42
|
|
|
I don't get what the video is, a secret message breadcrumb thing or a meme common in mafia?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2018 13:33
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:There was no mention of alignment change or cults in the OP. If there is a cult mechanic or any possibility that my win condition can be altered, replace me now. What is role madness and what does a deathmiller do? I get alignment change would men swapping sides from scum to town and back.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2018 20:16
|
|
|
At the moment there seems to be a clear divide in those that think flavour is important and those that don't, which is interesting because I haven't got a clue about our DBZ universe or what you guys are talking about.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2018 10:23
|
|
|
But isn't it the case that this early on we are voting blind anyway, and that until we have a reveal we have nothing to go on. Once we get past the first night we will be able to go back and look at who voted for who ever went first. Hence why if there was a deathmiller it really screwing over the game.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2018 10:54
|
|
|
I don't have a read on anyone this early.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:01
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:Maybe this will help encourage you to try. Your right it will ##vote mordiceius
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:12
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:@mona: my townread of 50 was not based on his scumread of asiina post. it's more of a meta read. ive been on a scumteam with 50 twice, and couldnt help but notice that his post style is very different compared to his scum games That's interesting. Do peoples posting style normally change depending on role and if so doesn't that make the game a lot easier for experienced players who have played together before?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:17
|
|
|
I think having certainty about anything this early on is daft and a lot of words are getting posted about nothing, so I can understand the need for a recap because I haven't followed whats going on and I've been reading the posts!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:33
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:I am seriously asking though. You said something, and you want it to be taken as your true thoughts, so please go on and expand on what you said. You sound like your looking for a fight more than anyone else so far with this post.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:35
|
|
|
Xad posted:Was rereading some posts and this one stuck out to me a bit, really don't like the "hm welp guess you have to claim or get executed It does read that way but is that a bad thing? Why is forcing people to claim an issue if it gets the ball rolling early on when we have nothing else to go on.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 01:37
|
|
" line there
|
50 pounds of bread posted:The other two people voting mord right now (gtg didn't hold their unvote) are rhjamiz and Willie Dee. I'm only voting for him because he voted for me. I'll ## unvote if we are getting too close to the end of the day and read the 150 posts that have come up over night to try and get some reads.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 09:40
|
|
|
I'm at work so can't do a big post, but when I'm back tonight I'll do a long post on who I would vote for and why.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 14:21
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:This didn't really get picked up by anyone since it was in the middle of the android flavor debacle but Lumpen is dead on about Xad's comment here. I disagree, I think that makes perfect sense and can see the logic. It would be too obvious but this reads like causing trouble out of nothing and that you are aligned with Lumpen. 50 pounds of bread posted:The other two people voting mord right now (gtg didn't hold their unvote) are rhjamiz and Willie Dee. I'm not going to lie, I was only voting for him because he was voting for me, I am happy to ## unvote and vote for someone based on the logic of scum hunting rather than newbie retaliation. Nothing anyone has posted has read to me as decisively scum, and the theories are all wild speculation from what I can tell. I think I would be more likely to vote based on lurking than I have been on anyones posts. Or I'll go back to voting for Mord because he voted for me, but that feels petty, at least hes posting and providing content for us to go on later.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 18:29
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:It's kind of weird that people keep forgetting they already said something and unvoted previously. Yea I thought I had but this thread is moving very quickly and I couldn't find it. That and posting on my phone from work doesn't always work so I thought better be safe than sorry.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 18:43
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:I forgot who had the meltdown earlier but I do wanna point out that every single player who had one in the past few games was scum. Can anyone else with experience vouch for this?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 18:57
|
|
|
Rhjamiz posted:To me, this is your scummiest post so far. I get being frustrated with being mislynched d1. And yeah, you've made your scum reads clear. But you've done nothing to inform anyone not onboard with them already, or unsure about your own trustworthyness. This attitude you've taken toward it is, basically, only helpful to you if you're actually scum. What you've done here is set up a sort of "Lynch me, cowards" situation where any town watching get paralyzed by this sort of WIFOM gambit where "Scum wouldn't paint a target on themselves, but wait, scum would know people would think that so it's the perfect gambit, but town would know that and lynch them anyway" endless loving rabbithole where no one watching, unless they have extensive experience with you, can reliably read you as either scum or town. Being unreadable is a Scum move. I get the logic here, but at least he is posting content, there are people lurking way harder aren't there? That being said this is the only convincing theory on scum I have seen so far based on what is being posted in the thread, I am not convinced by it (hard to be sure about much this early on im guessing as we are all voting blind) but I can at least see Rhjamiz's point where as most of the other bickering seems to be either based on nothing or is going over my head.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 19:20
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:It's never fun. Playing this is never fun. If you are having such a miserable time, im happy to vote you out of the game based on it being a mercy for you but also the comment about breakdowns normally equalling scum historically. ##vote Jeabus Mahogany
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 19:32
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:This is a really loving bad post and you should really not do this. We're not in joke phase and now you're just coming across as an rear end in a top hat. A few things. The dude wanted out of the game, I was helping him out, now he's changed his mind so ## unvote. How's that being an rear end in a top hat, one guy who doesn't want to play gets to leave the game and we get to see how accurate the theory of scum only meltdown. Its makes perfect logical sense. I didn't factor in "7. No replacements after D2." from the op correctly, I assumed it meant irl day 2 not game day 2. I feel dumb that I didn't bother to think about it. Now that's been pointed out as well yes it was a bad post now I have more accurate information.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 22:18
|
|
|
Dancer posted:
I get how I omgus but how is that a scum trait? And can you explain how I role fished? (Genuinely want to know so I can learn not to do that)
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 22:20
|
|
|
Asiina posted:willie's post history is adorable, btw. I recommend everyone read this baby deer fumbling around on his spindly legs I demand to be taken seriously and feel all my posts had logic and rationale behind them.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 22:36
|
|
|
I R SMART LIKE ROCK posted:I've dug into Sal a bit and something that stood out to me: Don't the two bolded bits in each quote support each other rather than contradict? As in, he's saying he doesn't take claims seriously and his own claim confirms that to him. He hasn't actually claimed what that claim is, just other peoples claims don't sync with his own so his initial statement not to trust claims stands.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2018 23:37
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:
These are unsettling. I'm going to sleep soon and should probably vote for someone based on a good theory I can even slightly get behind, just thinking out loud here. If I don't vote will that be a problem?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 00:02
|
|
|
I R SMART LIKE ROCK posted:Well that is an interpretation but they specifically state that they are town and that flavor would contradict the claims other people have made Right but I can understand that, I don't think it makes him hypocritical though or scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 00:04
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:
This is the post in question, and I can kind of see your point Sal, it reads to me like "Hey I went for some people but no one else bought it and now someone else has been mentioned I'm jumping on them".
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 00:55
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:where the hell is everyone Agreed, Ice Phoenix fits both my criteria in that I don't like his posts and he has been pretty lurky in comparison to other people. ##vote Ice Phoenix I'm voting because I'm British and need to go to sleep soon and more experienced people than me are telling me it's good to vote for someone. Happy to have my mind changed before I fall asleep.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:00
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:
Maybe I'm being a bit omgus, but here is your post no one agreed with you on to the point where it didn't take off and you then jumped on the quickest alternative.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:02
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I like where you’re coming from but is there anyone with other votes on them at the moment that you think are the scum! I'd vote for Mord, he's been deeply unpleasant to me (and I am to him probably in fairness, not taking it personally), I don't follow his 50 vote and enough people have danced with him that it would reveal a lot about the game depending on which way he flips.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:11
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:If I just jumped on the quickest alternative, shouldn't I have voted for someone that had more than two votes at the time? I was specifically trying not to omgus you and not take it personally. People were going for Sal, they might not have voted but he was talked about enough. Everyone's being kind of lapse with the voting, 2 is plenty in this game for a ball to start rolling.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:13
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:This is a bad post and you should try harder. Teach me why it's bad. It makes sense to me. If your going to call me bad fair enough, I'm new and I bow to greater experience, but at least be productive with it like other people have. Calling my posts bad every time I post with my logic and thought out reasoning makes you seem arrogant at best, scum at worst.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:16
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:scum have to be lurking to try to cause a no lynch. but why? I thought no lynch helped scum? The logic being that they have a chance to murder at night a town person at no risk of any of them being lynched that day.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:19
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:I will ask this question, then. Why do you think I should take my vote off of Sal? When I voted his posts were basically "don't claim," "it takes a lot of votes to lynch," and "oh this is a good post." I'm not sure what makes my statement about his posting at that point false. Because his posts are more thought out and don't read scummy to me, and he's posted more than some lurkers, including you I think.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:27
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:If Scum could say nothing and and never vote, and Town was so lurky and disorganized they could never pull together a lynch, then Scum would nightkill their way to victory easily. Scum benefit for any nolynch because it's a free bonus nightkill. Town can only win if they lynch Scum and they only get one chance per day/night cycle. Town may waste their chance, Scum won't waste theirs. Yea that's really obvious, questioning it does seem too dumb to be true.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:30
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:Mafia edit But even with that factored in he has still posted more than other people. I can see your point now it's being fleshed out but you triggered my scumdar initially
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 01:39
|
|
|
I refuse to watch anime ever since Cowboy Bebop because apparently nothing is any where near close as good
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 13:59
|
|
|
I'm going to go back and see who told me that all meltdowns were scum.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 04:44 |
|
|
I'm just trying to follow the logic here on how bigger games work. If there was only one death it means that there's either only one scum team, or there are others and they either didn't do anything or were prevented from doing it? How likely is it a scum team decide not to kill?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 22:11
|
|