Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
gohmak
Feb 12, 2004
cookies need love
I loved the A New Hope reference.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tommy 2.0
Apr 26, 2008

My fabulous CoX shall live forever!

14/f/ca

forest spirit
Apr 6, 2009

Frigate Hetman Sahaidachny
First to Fight Scuttle, First to Fall Sink


Sir Kodiak posted:

At no point does theorycrafting about what a potential safety feature might look like improve a reading of the film.

I don't know what the issue is, Spielberg didn't address it because it doesn't matter. It doesn't seem like you're using the fact that they don't trip up or anything to critique the film or to reinforce a specific reading. The guy who understands how jokes work provided the explanation, a wzrd did it.

Also it's not really theory crafting, just common sense. We never see anyone trip up or run full tilt into a wall. Spielberg is telling you this

Sir Kodiak posted:

The reason this is dumb is not because it's impossible to safely walk down a sidewalk, but that it is ridiculous to control a video game wherein,
It's ridiculous to control a videogame wherein they have photorealistic graphics good enough to fool people very familiar with VR. Everything in this movie is ridiculous. I don't follow how the buck stops there with regards to poo poo not making sense in a sci fi movie

FiftySeven
Jan 1, 2006


I WON THE BETTING POOL ON TESSAS THIRD STUPID VOTE AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS HALF-ASSED TITLE



Slippery Tilde
So one thing that I strongly took from this film despite enjoying it on the whole, is that Wade Watts relationship with Artemis is extremely unhealthy and I have since been told that the film actually doesn't even scratch the surface when it comes to books depiction of their relationship. I can't even begin to imagine how dysfunctional he must be in the books to be worse than what I saw in the film because honestly, he soars past cringey straight into creepy in the film already.

Its a bit of a shame really because I felt that there was lots of stuff to like about the film otherwise. I loved the soundtrack and aesthetics overall, even if the whole obsession with the 80s felt fairly unrealistic but then again its worth remembering that some people are like that with the 60s even now.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

FiftySeven posted:

So one thing that I strongly took from this film despite enjoying it on the whole, is that Wade Watts relationship with Artemis is extremely unhealthy and I have since been told that the film actually doesn't even scratch the surface when it comes to books depiction of their relationship. I can't even begin to imagine how dysfunctional he must be in the books to be worse than what I saw in the film because honestly, he soars past cringey straight into creepy in the film already.

In the book he interacts with her a lot less directly. Like in the book the way he learns she has a port wine stain is by hacking into IOI and finding out they are going to murder her and that they have photos in her home (and then looking at the photos of her). Like in general the book has the same love story but most information in the movie that is portrayed by her telling him is in the book him somehow searching the information on line then telling her he knows already.

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

FiftySeven posted:

So one thing that I strongly took from this film despite enjoying it on the whole, is that Wade Watts relationship with Artemis is extremely unhealthy and I have since been told that the film actually doesn't even scratch the surface when it comes to books depiction of their relationship. I can't even begin to imagine how dysfunctional he must be in the books to be worse than what I saw in the film because honestly, he soars past cringey straight into creepy in the film already.

Its a bit of a shame really because I felt that there was lots of stuff to like about the film otherwise. I loved the soundtrack and aesthetics overall, even if the whole obsession with the 80s felt fairly unrealistic but then again its worth remembering that some people are like that with the 60s even now.

In the movie, it's just one of those "we are in love instantly" dumb online relationships that will probably fail in a week. In the book, I recall him cyber stalking her a lot more and a lot more entitlement.

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry
RPO is a great movie because it reminded me that my life isn't so lovely after all... :unsmith:

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."
It’s been a long while since I read the book, but don’t Wade and Artemis not meet up until about 3/4 way through the book? I do remember that he travels halfway across the country to get to her.

The film’s terrible ‘oh, we all lived in Columbus this whole time, what a coincidence’ thing really bothered me for some reason.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

The_Doctor posted:

It’s been a long while since I read the book, but don’t Wade and Artemis not meet up until about 3/4 way through the book?

They don't meet up until after the final battle and wade finds out she has a birth mark by hacking surveillance footage inside her house.

Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Penpal posted:

Also it's not really theory crafting, just common sense.

Specific technical solutions, which is what I'm arguing against fans writing into the movie, are not "common sense."

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry
"Ready Player One is as exciting as reading the numbers off of a Quebec license plate."

forest spirit
Apr 6, 2009

Frigate Hetman Sahaidachny
First to Fight Scuttle, First to Fall Sink


Sir Kodiak posted:

Specific technical solutions, which is what I'm arguing against fans writing into the movie, are not "common sense."

Oh yeah I don't think we disagree. I don't care about a diegetic answer to how any of the vr works, it's all fairytale. The film has people run full tilt in VR on the streets because it makes for a cool shot to match cut to thhhhee oooaaasiis

DC Murderverse
Nov 10, 2016

"Tell that to Zod's snapped neck!"

here's a take I think we all need right now:

quote:

eady Player One starts with dystopia: a Columbus, Ohio, housing ghetto in 2045, known as “The Stacks” for its resemblance to piled-up recreational vehicles, that is home to the film’s hero. Then the movie shifts gears from depressing hyperrealism to escapist fantasy.

But this escapism is so self-aware that it remains unconvincing. Wade Watts (Tye Sheridan), the film’s 18-year-old hero, seems younger. He’s become accustomed to nearly autistic diversion; he evades the misery of poverty, joblessness, isolation, and orphanhood (he lives with his aunt in a makeshift broken home oppressed by an abusive adult male). Secluding himself behind a visor and a pair of hand switches, Wade enters the OASIS, a virtual-reality-simulator game that provides his only release. His avatar is “Parzival,” named after a character from Arthurian mythology, who acts out his desperate venture in digital battles. Haptic technology gives him virtual contact (both visible and tactile) with anonymous but politically diverse playmates. They are Wade’s OASIS tribe, even including an adolescent love interest.

The above description should concern you because it’s full of cultural politics. Cultural politics enter Ready Player One when it becomes clear that Wade and the gamers all uncritically worship the digital manufacturer of OASIS, the late James Halliday (Mark Rylance acting absent-minded). As a way out of their dystopian despair, they pursue Halliday’s posthumous challenge to find three special keys to his bequest, a kingdom of corporate riches and earthly dominance. Unthinking viewers will see Wade’s venture as mere entertainment. But thinking viewers should see this tale as director Steven Spielberg’s parallel for the modern condition and a justification for escapism — another disappointing, though confessional, version of The Greatest Showman.

Look at how Halliday clearly represents techno mogul Steve Jobs, hybridized with an earlier generation’s Walt Disney. Spielberg plays sorcerer’s apprentice to both, causing competition between the techno and visionary sides of his genius: Insidious commercialism clashes with quasi spirituality, the mogul vs. the artist. The Halliday scenes evoke Citizen Kane yet are almost as hallowed as those in Lincoln.

Spielberg submits himself to playing out scenes of ultimate fanboy fantasy, but his nimble storytelling can’t hide depths of unacknowledged political despair. The social conflict implicit in Wade’s race for Halliday’s prize (hidden within digital “Easter eggs”) works against the adolescent thrall with pop culture that inspired Ernest Cline’s 2011 source novel. (Cline also wrote the script for the charmingly innocent, unjustly overlooked 2009 film Fanboys.) Now Spielberg uses that thrall to inveigle his audience; this film’s title blatantly invites viewers to enjoy a cascade of pop trivia.

Paul W. S. Anderson’s game-based movies, especially his stirring remake of Death Race, and Edgar Wright’s exhilarating Scott Pilgrim vs. the World have definitively presented gamer fantasy as an allegory for real life. But Spielberg never gets to the irony of virtual reality’s vicarious experience — which Luc Besson already spoofed throughout Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. None of this story’s dramatic tensions — Wade’s rivalry with the corporate boss Sorrento (Ben Mendelsohn) and a longed-for romance with Art3mis/Samantha (Olivia Cooke) — ever amounts to real-world awakening. Spielberg’s imagery makes one’s head spin without provoking thought. The finale is as trite as Bong Joon-ho’s in Okja. The desire to celebrate video games and pop junk is such an unrewarding idea that it makes The Lego Movie’s satire seem transcendent.

Spielberg’s insistence on this juvenilia after four demoralizing political films suggests a creative crisis. While The Post looked and felt tossed-off, Spielberg is clearly applying himself here, as shown in the immediacy of the lead performances. Wade’s anxiety is conveyed through Sheridan’s awkward-age pubescence, and he’s ideally paired with Cooke, who evokes the womanly promise of Deborah Van Valkenburgh and Carla Gugino (the film’s true movie-geek Easter egg). Though Spielberg’s genius has been missing of late, it shows up in the film’s one great, dramatically adroit image, when Wade confronts Sorrento. The face of the villainous adult is reflected in Wade’s visor — right between the boy’s eyes — perhaps a prophetic image of Wade’s unconscious self. That one shot surpasses all of The Last Jedi.

Marvel fanboys who are unaccustomed to action-movie panache will probably be wowed by Spielberg’s ten-minute gaming race, an extended tour de force. Parzival and other virtual-reality gladiators speed past one another, crashing through explosions and obstructions that could be a condensed history of our collective pop-culture detritus — from King Kong to Jurassic Park. This sequence, patterned after Spielberg’s dazzlement in The Adventures of Tintin, is so advanced that it seems post-cinematic. Laughter is cut short by awe. Super-video-game images hurtle by, beyond dream logic, into a realm of pop phenomenology where nothing appears as it seems. Each phantasm can morph or combust, resulting in either doom for the player or a reward of points or coins (with spangly bursts of enthusiasm like those Edgar Wright depicted as visual onomatopoeia in Scott Pilgrim vs. the World).

This demolition derby suggests a kinetic version of A.I.’s Flesh Fair — but without the moral or emotional consequences. It’s a breathless bender that, as it goes along, hollows out Parzival’s symbolic quest for an unspecified holy grail. The pell-mell action never pauses so that we can consider how this relentless excitation rattles the senses. And that, tragically, is how gaming’s trash pop culture has deprived several generations of spiritual reflection. It merely reflects their alienation (which was the underlying theme of Anderson’s Death Race but here is virtually forgotten).

The fallacy at the heart of Ready Player One is that Wade’s win as Parzival takes on sentimental, if not philosophical, dimensions; that the puzzlingly violent razzle-dazzle workout prepares its characters for life; and that gaming implicitly provides new cognitive patterns for its players. Spielberg immerses himself in the delusion that virtual reality equates to cinema, the photographic reflection of life. Although the film moves with Spielberg’s signature flair, it is slowed down intellectually when Wade’s anxiety and desperation are replaced with an unreal commitment to demigod Halliday and his ersatz principles. The “fun” becomes meaningless.

Ready Player One’s concept is so apologetic about pop-culture deception that it is kryptonite for a director who doesn’t apply all his intelligence or discover anything new. Note how the pop-music cues feign nostalgia: Spielberg’s synthetic Saturday Night Fever homage should rightly refer to Michael Jackson’s Thriller (a genuine civilizing phenomenon that belongs to the film’s ’80s gestalt); it might have elevated the film’s concept of pop-culture bliss. This pop jamboree demands satire, but Spielberg doesn’t go there, either for fear of losing his audience or because the movie is fundamentally empty.

A once-great filmmaker has taken on a new avatar less heroic than Parzival. It is the avatar of a pandering crowd-pleaser. Spielberg, the D. W. Griffith of the sound era — who ironically, when the politically correct putsch began in 1999, turned his back on Griffith by failing to speak up as the Directors Guild of America stripped Griffith’s name and legacy from its awards — now celebrates Hollywood’s most craven tendencies. The crowd-pleaser has outdone himself.

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
:same:

This movie sucks.

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy
I have to disagree that Marvel fanboys would be wowed. I'm not sure anyone is wowed by this movie.

Gnome de plume
Sep 5, 2006

Hell.
Fucking.
Yes.
The thing with people running around in public with OASIS gear reminds me of this segment in a local sketch comedy show from the 90s about a guy walking around in VR helmet getting into all kinds of trouble not realising he was interacting with real people and things at the same time he was experiencing the VR world, and at one point he eventually ends up looking like this https://imgur.com/ONTYO6l (nsfw)

The show was probably not all that good tbh but I wish I could find more than the 4 clips online.

nerd_of_prey
Mar 27, 2010

The_Doctor posted:

It’s been a long while since I read the book, but don’t Wade and Artemis not meet up until about 3/4 way through the book? I do remember that he travels halfway across the country to get to her.

The film’s terrible ‘oh, we all lived in Columbus this whole time, what a coincidence’ thing really bothered me for some reason.

Yeah it annoyed me how easily they all met up, in the book it seemed much more worldwide, and they were only bought together because of Simon Peggs characters money at the very end, but in the film they all just bumped into each other no problem!

I generally thought the film was better than the book (which was tedious beyond belief), I thought visually it was stunning, the stacks looked great, the oasis looked impressive. Halliday was portrayed well, as a deeply flawed creator.

I didn't like the car race first task as in the book Parcival found the first clue on the school/education planet which I thought was a nice touch because he was really poor and only had access to the free to play planets and his free educational oasis interface. It seemed more believable that an obscure corner of a schooling planet might be overlooked than people wouldn't have realised to go backwards in a race.

The end of the film got a bit ridiculous, seeing the hench woman chasing a van down the street on foot and all she can do is watch it drive away when she has minions and drones and stuff!

Jukebox Hero
Dec 27, 2007
stars in his eyes
Why didn't the evil corporation send a guy to shoot Wade in the head?

Not the dumbass bomb attack that's way too obvious. Just send a dude with a gun to blow all the kids' brains out. The bad guy's a CEO, he probably can't even get an erection without killing a prostitute.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Jukebox Hero posted:

Why didn't the evil corporation send a guy to shoot Wade in the head?

Not the dumbass bomb attack that's way too obvious. Just send a dude with a gun to blow all the kids' brains out. The bad guy's a CEO, he probably can't even get an erection without killing a prostitute.
They sent a raid of privatized corporate paramilitary to find opponents of IOI (I forgot if they were specifically looking for Wade). They also used a privatized surveillance apparatus to find him and send goons to murder him. The ceo himself literally chased after him with a gun.

The drone bomb attack is suggested in the film to look like a gas explosion to reduce police scrutiny. Sending drone bombers (or drones with other murder weapons) seems like a less risky way to murder someone. They just did it movie incompetently by warning the victim, not confirming Wade's presence, and not confirming his corpse.


The film provides interesting commentary about drones. Weaponized miniature drones are essentially used for mass surveillance and murder in the film. I can very easily envision a near future America of police drones dropping tear gas on crowds, firing tasers, and firing rubber bullets.

comedyblissoption fucked around with this message at 12:04 on Apr 5, 2018

Jukebox Hero
Dec 27, 2007
stars in his eyes
They're an evil megacorporation. In the post apocalypse. There are no drat police outside of the giant bubble cities. Why not just cap him while he's playing video games for twelve hours...?

Don't they literally know when he's playing the game? God, I hate this book. The movie was like, a tiny bit better but it was brutally generic.

Jukebox Hero fucked around with this message at 12:28 on Apr 5, 2018

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

Jukebox Hero posted:

They're an evil megacorporation. In the post apocalypse. There are no drat police outside of the giant bubble cities. Why not just cap him while he's playing video games for twelve hours...?

Don't they literally know when he's playing the game? God, I hate this book. The movie was like, a tiny bit better but it was brutally generic.

They should have done that and then Tye Sheridan transforms into Raul Julia and shouts "I AM INTERFACE" and then Tye Julia becomes the Oasis.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Jukebox Hero posted:

They're an evil megacorporation. In the post apocalypse. There are no drat police outside of the giant bubble cities. Why not just cap him while he's playing video games for twelve hours...?

Don't they literally know when he's playing the game? God, I hate this book. The movie was like, a tiny bit better but it was brutally generic.
It might seem unrealistic, but to be fair, irl megacorporations even in the tech industry can be criminally incompetent.

A fantastic example of this is breaking labor laws with anti-poaching agreements to suppress worker wages by silicon valley tech companies. They wrote down their conspiracy in e-mail that later showed up in the courts.

The even dumber thing about attempting to murder Wade was saying his murder conspiracy on the Oasis in a way Wade and the game platform could probably record.

comedyblissoption fucked around with this message at 13:01 on Apr 5, 2018

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

DC Murderverse posted:

here's a take I think we all need right now:

Shouldn't White praise this garbage for uhhh triggering liberals or something

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

he's a scumbag but fairly consistent in his reviewing

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

Jukebox Hero posted:

They're an evil megacorporation. In the post apocalypse. There are no drat police outside of the giant bubble cities. Why not just cap him while he's playing video games for twelve hours...?

I feel like the setting in the book was made weird because the real world was so clearly just references the same way OASIS was. So the real world could have cyberpunk stuff but then also mad max raiders then also a weather report style news broadcast listing where there was nuclear fallout that day. It was just kitchen sink future and didn't mean anything.

The movie seems to be more vague, it's hard to tell if he's poor or everyone is poor. Like he lived in a slum and the resistance lived in a slum so slums existed but when they weren't driving in back alleys it seemed like it was a reasonable city with teens in nice clothes using VR cell phones.

Like the book was very "just have whatever, it doesn't matter" and if they had mentioned an alien invasion it wouldn't really have felt out of place, the movie feels kinda unclear on how bad off the world was supposed to be.

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend
It was really weird when the police showed up at the end. IOI has been bombing housing developments and halling people off to debtors' prison with impunity- was the CEO showing up and firing a gun in the air the last straw for some reason? Why now? I guess maybe we're to assume that IOI has thrown him under the bus?

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

General Dog posted:

It was really weird when the police showed up at the end. IOI has been bombing housing developments and halling people off to debtors' prison with impunity- was the CEO showing up and firing a gun in the air the last straw for some reason? Why now? I guess maybe we're to assume that IOI has thrown him under the bus?

I think a lot of double standards in policing work that way, where the police will do everything they can to give the powerful group a benefit of the doubt or look the other way, but you still gotta not like, walk out in broad daylight and fire a gun personally.

Like you can look at like the 1930s south and see a huge lynchings and mob 'justice' and stuff against black people, just open killings for all sorts of minor or imagined crimes. But you can also find some cases of white people arrested for killing blacks, and they are all times someone just took it too far and didn't play by the established rules of categories that would be overlooked or sanctioned by the police and were to the point the police couldn't make up an excuse why not to investigate.

Scoops My Goops
Dec 3, 2004

by Reene

Jukebox Hero posted:

They're an evil megacorporation. In the post apocalypse. There are no drat police outside of the giant bubble cities. Why not just cap him while he's playing video games for twelve hours...?

Don't they literally know when he's playing the game? God, I hate this book. The movie was like, a tiny bit better but it was brutally generic.

His hideout was supposed to be stupidly well hidden.

The Cameo
Jan 20, 2005


His van is hidden under a big pile of cars that he's either burrowed or found a path into the center of that seems to be clear across the stacks from his laundry room-turned-bedroom. Seems like it'd be pretty hard to find.

There's mentions of there being a nicer part of Cleveland, specifically when his aunt gets pissed over her lovely boyfriend wasting 50,000 on Doomworld stuff when that money was going to go to getting them out of the stacks - and I think Sorrento tries to bribe Wade with having an apartment worth a million, so it felt like to me that things had gotten to the Brazil "golf courses and penthouses surrounded by shanty towns" level of inequality in America, and the idea was "a bunch of poor kids take down the impossibly rich empire" with the specific echoes of modern justice taken to their logical conclusion - where the Uber-rich don't really feel repercussions unless they do something wildly blatant (like fire a gun near a group of white people and show intent to murder a white person as the cops arrive) and corporations basically have even more carte blanche than that to override the law with no reprisal. Aech specifically mentions being from Detroit, which as we all know is a hollow shell of a city now. Sho and Daito are a bit odd, though, since they're pretty clearly either first-generation immigrants or somehow ended up in Cleveland directly from Japan, and they're not really explored at all. I suppose in this future, Abenomics and a continued dominance from the LDP has continued not to work and left the middle and working classes there as hosed as ever, leading to a migration?

It's all a bit odd as it is, since Cleveland has evidently expanded massively into the fastest growing city in the US just off of Gregarious Games and IOI being headquartered there. The background of everything is a bit blurry, a bit ramshackle, but that might be more an effect of the narrative being solely focused on Wade and the OASIS and his crusade inside it. Like, this Wade has checked out from the rest of the world. He doesn't want to engage in it - he falls in love with a girl from Twitch streams and walkthroughs, for crying out loud (and she calls him out on his refusal to engage with reality, falling in love with an avatar and an idea of a person in his head... and then kidnaps him to bring him in on her revolution, although they go far enough to quickly explain that he's useful to the revolution's current situation as the #1 Halliday Nerd In The World). And "escapism is a drug, and like any other drug, if you let it guide your life, you'll miss everything" is pretty much the moral, so maybe it all works?

It's such a weird movie.

hiddenriverninja
May 10, 2013

life is locomotion
keep moving
trust that you'll find your way

I would assume in that day and age running a VPN would be standard with all the weird stuff you can get into in the Oasis.

Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


R. Guyovich posted:

he's a scumbag but fairly consistent in his reviewing

If anything he's calmed down from how vitriolic and professorial his reviews were a few years ago.

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Jukebox Hero posted:

Why didn't the evil corporation send a guy to shoot Wade in the head?

Not the dumbass bomb attack that's way too obvious. Just send a dude with a gun to blow all the kids' brains out. The bad guy's a CEO, he probably can't even get an erection without killing a prostitute.

I've said for years the real problem with villains is they simply lack good henchmen.

Conal Cochran
Dec 2, 2013

I like how in the future, with all its technological advancements, we've pretty much gone back to "Ask Jeeves."

Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Yeah, though natural language data retrieval is a fine idea. 1996 was just decades too early for it to be practical.

Corrosion
May 28, 2008

The Cameo posted:

And "escapism is a drug, and like any other drug, if you let it guide your life, you'll miss everything" is pretty much the moral, so maybe it all works?

The drug in question renders people in a fantasy where the image of exploding into money like Mario Bros, Faxanadu, countless other video games, is a rather appropriate image of what happens when games remove the subject-object relationship between participants and the game. So the contradiction here is that you have people running around as their favorite heroes, but in terms of what most of us become and what this film presents as everyone's ideal fantasy is that you look like a protagonist but you really "die" like a Goomba so the tech start up kid can fill up his gas tank. And I think that's a pretty visually accurate representation of the Libertarian fantasy relative to video games. It's a type of populism relative to video games and the arcade era. When it was said by, I think it was Spielberg, that "This is a movie that takes place both in the future and in the 80s", the aforementioned types of visuals represents that assertion well. Like when Parzival just opens his door to collect literal chump change, etc. Hell, I think it represents how lovely YouTube channels like Core-A-Gaming are following in the footsteps of Seth Killian in terms of creating the perfect spectator because people still welcome those special few rising to the top, even as they're playing the game themselves. There's no room for that sort of personal ownership of what you play before a scoreboard and your substance gets distributed to someone else in the game if you inevitably lose.

We have people engaged in play, fantasizing about being a hero, but even if you keep that to 5 out of 7 days of the week, the fantasy is about gamers inviting themselves to be obliterated to the advantage of a few chosen/lucky few. In that sense, I think the fact that an entire generation of games like what happened in the 90s where score gradually started disappearing (before eventually reemerging) kind of represents the nostalgia for specific eras of games and that libertarian ideology. I mean, you could read the movie as itself being an adventure game, but it's still conveyed by those old visual staples of arcade era video games.

I mean, that being said, I thought that this type of imagery was well-rendered on screen and the movie is quite accurate to what it's invoking at least on that level.

Corrosion fucked around with this message at 05:37 on Apr 8, 2018

GonSmithe
Apr 25, 2010

Perhaps it's in the nature of television. Just waves in space.
This movie was alright, but the scene where a horde of 12 year olds are running forward and then it shows them in the Oasis and they're all Master Chief cracked me up.

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

This movie kinda reminded me of Starship Troopers, where the movie itself is propaganda and skewed in favor of cutthroat capitalist society that exists within the movie's universe.

Capn Jobe
Jan 18, 2003

That's right. Here it is. But it's like you always have compared the sword, the making of the sword, with the making of the character. Cuz the stronger, the stronger it will get, right, the stronger the steel will get, with all that, and the same as with the character.
Soiled Meat
Saw this last week; I will say it was more self-aware than I expected. Overall not that great, but I was mildly entertained, and the movie wasn't as far up its own rear end as I feared.

The movie makes it pretty clear that the obsession with 80s/90s/00s pop culture is rooted in two things:

1. The future is so depressing that society has forgotten how to make new pop culture, leading to this sort of cargo-cult revolving around past pop culture. Or, I suppose you could argue that society can't make new pop culture because they're so obsessed with 80s/90s/00s pop culture. Either way, it's not healthy.

2. Everyone's obsessed with learning everything about the Mark Rylance character, who is unambiguously on the spectrum. That's right, everyone models their entertainment preferences after a known autist.

Now, the movie doesn't really commit to this, but I found this interesting. Also The Shining sequence was fun; I enjoyed the shot at the end where they're showing the IOI office with everyone freaking out in their headsets.

GonSmithe posted:

This movie was alright, but the scene where a horde of 12 year olds are running forward and then it shows them in the Oasis and they're all Master Chief cracked me up.

This too.

Blisster
Mar 10, 2010

What you are listening to are musicians performing psychedelic music under the influence of a mind altering chemical called...
Well this was better than I expected. Most of the action sequences were just kind of exhausting to watch though, especially the final battle. Didn't help that that scene had the highest volume of characters shouting "IT'S THIS CHARACTER FROM A THING YOU LIKE." Still it was cool that the solution to the puzzle was understanding the creator as a human being, rather than trivia from stuff he liked.

Overall though it was pretty fun. I really loved when the movie would contrast the Oasis scenes with what was happening in the real world. The army of corporate gamers cracked me up every time.

For some reason the stakes seemed super low for the whole thing though. I think we needed a bit more info about the real world to make it really work. And the ending was pretty unsatisfying. I mean they do something that materially improves peoples lives by shutting down the debt prisons, but closing the Oasis 2 days a week is a pretty lame triumph.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

The Lego Movie celebrated play. Ready Player One celebrated consumption of 'play'. It felt like a world of references in a way that people like the idea of liking something. And the best way to signal that was trivia. Like, I've played a LOT of Civ1 for MS-DOS. A lot. And I could spout off way too much civ1 trivia to ever be invited to parties. But I wouldn't say my knowledge of civ1 is the basis or the content for my love of it. RPO seemed to LOVE the idea of liking stuff. Also, whats with not subverting the most basic tropes oh wait this is a movie from teenage boys in the 80s to teenage boys in the 10s. Just lol at the last line of the movie: Reality is real.

  • Locked thread