|
Colonel Cancer posted:Is the dude with flying eye robots the same dude who got his head crushed in Blade runner?
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 07:39 |
|
|
Gazpacho posted:who cares, his scenes contribute absolutely nothing to the "plot" (much like harley's bf in suicide squad, what was his name) It's worldbuilding 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:07
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:yeah it reminds me of the way i felt after finishing Invisible War Yep ok its over. as good as I remember 9/10 thanks for watching
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:25
|
|
|
Good movie Not a good story.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:31
|
|
|
btw the asnwer to that question is given right on screen at the beginning of the movie (in a font that is probably unreadable in the DVD version)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:31
|
|
|
as far as i can remember at no point does anyone mention that las vegas in the movie is las vegas, it's introduced as this place that is very radioactive for reasons that you are left to guess at, and there are korean statues and korean signs and its ... not korea? v v
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 05:37
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:as far as i can remember at no point does anyone mention that las vegas in the movie is las vegas, it's introduced as this place that is very radioactive for reasons that you are left to guess at, and there are korean statues and korean signs and its ... not korea? v The second movie continues off the setting of the first, Atari is still a big deal, lots of analog tech and weird physical buttons and print outs. They maintained the setting and the movie benefits from it bigly. Guess vegas got smoked at some point.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 06:00
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:as far as i can remember at no point does anyone mention that las vegas in the movie is las vegas, it's introduced as this place that is very radioactive for reasons that you are left to guess at, and there are korean statues and korean signs and its ... not korea? v No. Las Vegas is called Las Vegas clearly. Otherwise how did you know it was Las Vegas?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 06:02
|
|
|
there's nothing in blade runner (the only movie) about las vegas being a place that catered exclusively to koreans but became radioactiveFrankenstyle posted:No. Las Vegas is called Las Vegas clearly. Otherwise how did you know it was Las Vegas?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 06:03
|
|
|
in blade runner deckard actually walks around urban los angeles. he visits places. he chases people. the "urban" set in this movie was the size of a drat shoebox and, aside from the visit with a street vendor, lil blade runner just sits at a food court table saying his lines
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 06:10
|
|
|
Frog Act posted:why does the bad guy want to make self reproducing replicants to colonize the stars when there are gigantic warehouse style orphanages full of surplus human children? doesn't make any sense. because he's a gigantic narcissist and it would be flattering to his ego
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 07:04
|
|
|
Holo waifu overlay for prozzies is the future
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 10:12
|
|
|
Kazak posted:love that big motorcycle sound now I pretend I'm in cyber future whenever I heara motorcycle rev
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 10:24
|
|
|
After I watched it, I said to myself ‘that didn’t actively ruin the first one so good job I guess’.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 10:36
|
|
|
I thought those children were thrown away replicants Oops
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 10:57
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:the "urban" set in this movie was the size of a drat shoebox and, aside from the visit with a street vendor, lil blade runner just sits at a food court table saying his lines I actually really liked it. Mostly because it worked well with the first without loving up what was good with it. Maybe I liked it less because of how good it was and more because it wasn't the pile of poo poo I was expecting. But yeah, the exterior sets were a huge step down from the first, and the CGI cityscapes have already aged more poorly than the models they used in the 80's. It would have been so much better if they'd hired carpenters instead of programmers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 13:27
|
|
|
myDad posted:it was good & I'm gonna watch it again
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 13:34
|
|
|
I think gazs gimmick is posting like a total nincompoop what dont understand movies
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 14:42
|
|
|
I thought it was p alright.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 14:49
|
|
|
I liked the shower tech
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 15:09
|
|
|
Spoiler: I thought the ending was pretty hosed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 15:57
|
|
|
myDad posted:it was good & I'm gonna watch it again 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:09
|
|
|
i thought it was underrated.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:13
|
|
|
Where the gently caress is my Cyberpunk 2020 movie based on the game? They were gonna make a vidya based on the 2070 universe but I want the 2020 movie. And I want it done right. Damnit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:18
|
|
|
It could have been like 30 minutes shorter without cutting out a single scene if they made every scene shorter by cutting down on the time spent deliberately gazing and reacting
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
He runs a company that makes replicants and would make more money by building and selling more replicants
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:33
|
|
|
I'm glad that I ate drugs biscuits and went to go this movie at the imax, twice
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:36
|
|
|
that movie was super overrated
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:37
|
|
|
The scene with the daughter where she's making the memories was amazing, one of my favorite scenes in cinema ever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:38
|
|
|
Doctor J Off posted:It could have been like 30 minutes shorter without cutting out a single scene if they made every scene shorter by cutting down on the time spent deliberately gazing and reacting This is one of the things I liked about it
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:40
|
|
|
Also there are a bunch of very obvious shots of the luxor in the vegas part of the movie, they didn't need to have someone pipe up and say "Hell o it is las vegas here" or have LAS VEGAS BUT ITS BAD IN THE FUTURE pop up on the screen like in the opening scene
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:41
|
|
|
HOW DO THEY poo poo IN THE FUTURE, RIDS
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:44
|
|
|
The Big Word posted:Also there are a bunch of very obvious shots of the luxor in the vegas part of the movie, they didn't need to have someone pipe up and say "Hell o it is las vegas here" or have LAS VEGAS BUT ITS BAD IN THE FUTURE pop up on the screen like in the opening scene The best part about this movie was how you had to connect the dots like that. It doesn't out and out tell you explicitly that harrison ford is in las vegas or that robin wright has a huge uncut 8 inch cock she pegs rogue replicants with. It treats the viewers like adults, which i like.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:48
|
|
|
Doctor J Off posted:It could have been like 30 minutes shorter without cutting out a single scene if they made every scene shorter by cutting down on the time spent deliberately gazing and reacting Your time isn't that valuable
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 16:49
|
|
|
Colonel Cancer posted:New blade runner had good atmosphere but holy poo poo could this movie be better. Remove the fake robot girlfriend or make her more related to the plot, and definitely remove geriatric loving Harrison Ford. I'd say I hope his next plane crash is fatal but we now have the technology to put dead actors into movies so we'll be seeing him for the next 50 or so years anyways. Jack Off Instructions was part of the story. She is made by Leto's company and spies on Gosling. Plus, near the end the advertisement says something like "everything you want to hear" or some poo poo which is exposition that says the audience is too dumb so we will tell you outright. What they needed to get rid of was Harrison Ford. Old people need to die faster.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 17:13
|
|
|
time to die
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 17:21
|
|
|
I dunno it was pretty good and enjoyable. Sorry ya can't enjoy a few hours diversion from whatever's going on in your life.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 17:37
|
|
|
It was basically beautiful cinematography: the movie and not a whole lot else, but I'm into that so that was enough for me to like it. It definitely could have been 30 minutes shorter and Gosling's character doesn't feel like an emotionless android but more like an angsty depressed teenager, and Ford either didn't want to do this at all or was given nothing to say or do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 18:15
|
|
|
The replicants are not and never have been meant to be emotionless. That's such a fundamental misunderstanding of the whole premise I question whether you even saw the movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 18:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 07:39 |
|
|
SweetMercifulCrap! posted:It was basically beautiful cinematography: the movie and not a whole lot else, but I'm into that so that was enough for me to like it. It definitely could have been 30 minutes shorter and Gosling's character doesn't feel like an emotionless android but more like an angsty depressed teenager, and Ford either didn't want to do this at all or was given nothing to say or do. He used all his autism spoons in drive
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 18:18
|
|
