|
Jesus, remind me to never have a board game night with you people.
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 20:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:43 |
|
|
I'm wondering if the cucu/pre-cucu strategy should be used here. That would mean KB investigates DB, Cpig makes DB his chancellor and then DB makes KB his chancellor. This should force any fascist to fake liberal or out themselves and the chances of all three of them being facist seems unlikely. Theoretically that should get us to 4L1S since DB would presumably be investigated as liberal and then provide a backup check on KB. The danger would be if KB and DB are fascists together.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 20:35
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Jesus, remind me to never have a board game night with you people. Rofl, this would obviously be way different in RL where people are sitting there and can yay or nay quickly. But just like mafia on a message board, it is like herding cats to get everyone to comment on everything.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 20:35
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I'm wondering if the cucu/pre-cucu strategy should be used here. That would mean KB investigates DB, Cpig makes DB his chancellor and then DB makes KB his chancellor. This should force any fascist to fake liberal or out themselves and the chances of all three of them being facist seems unlikely. I was sort of assuming we'd be doing something like this regardless of who I picked. Like in the RF example, if he investigates liberal, Pig should draft him as his chancellor.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 20:41
|
|
|
##investigate RF
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 22:08
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Rofl, this would obviously be way different in RL where people are sitting there and can yay or nay quickly. Hahaha I wish, there's a guy I often play Resistance/SH with who always goes on about the mathematically perfect way to nominate people. I've started voting against whatever he proposes every time he uses the word "algorithm"
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 22:41
|
|
|
On phone so no effort post. KB was given the investigation result, new day can start
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 00:25
|
|
|
On phone so no effort post. KB was given the investigation result, new day can start. Nomination deadline in 72 hours.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 00:51
|
|
|
Dancer posted:Game status:
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 01:00
|
|
|
Oops, meant to add that the above should be the current situation with no addition given information. I just quoted Dancer from the start of the investigation period and stripped out the extra words.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 01:02
|
|
|
Welp. Rf is a fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:00
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Welp. Rf is a fascist. 
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:13
|
|
|
So we now know for sure that either KingB or RF is a fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:17
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:So we now know for sure that either KingB or RF is a fascist. Or both, but for now we wait on a word from RF?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:20
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:So we now know for sure that either KingB or RF is a fascist. Yah, that is really good to know. So who do we think is good for chancellor this go round? Let us discuss.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:20
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Or both, but for now we wait on a word from RF? Not really sure what you’re looking for here. I’m a liberal so KB is a bad guy, but it’s not like I’d admit it if I were bad so it’s literally my word against his until we get that second investigation done
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:33
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Yah, that is really good to know. Should be me. I kind of have to pick a liberal policy now, even if I was a fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:34
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Yah, that is really good to know. I really would have preferred a liberal result personally. So were the folks pointing away from rf as their first choice his buddies? Would they be that obvious?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 02:57
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Should be me. I kind of have to pick a liberal policy now, even if I was a fascist. This is utter nonsense. Obviously RF should not be chosen. Probably strategy would dictate that I am also locked out from any admin until we have more info.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 03:00
|
|
|
Hmm...well this is certainly interesting information and I'm going to have to ponder it for a bit. On the surface, I think I'm more willing to believe KB than RF but that is mostly just a gut call. Plus, a fascist KB could have claimed that he gave me a choice and then used the investigation to claim someone was a fascist and thus lock two people besides himself out of government until things got resolved. And while the chances might be low, there is still the possibility that KB gets investigated before an RF presidency opportunity which would essentially ruin this whole play unless one of CPig/DB is also a fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 03:26
|
|
|
As for the Chancellor recommendations. I would suggest one of AA, kumba or me. AA hasn't been in government yet (neither has DB, but he's next up for President) and both kumba and I weren't given choices, so we should be able to get information from any of those choices. I'm not sure I'd want to try either PMush or CapnAndy until after a reshuffle, but I think I trust PMush maybe a little bit more right now.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 03:30
|
|
|
Oh yeah, and Byers...I'm not sure what to think about Byers just yet, but I'm not sure I want to give him a shot again just yet either.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 03:32
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:As for the Chancellor recommendations. I would suggest one of AA, kumba or me. AA hasn't been in government yet (neither has DB, but he's next up for President) and both kumba and I weren't given choices, so we should be able to get information from any of those choices. I am inclined to say AA or kumba
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Should be me. I kind of have to pick a liberal policy now, even if I was a fascist. The nice thing about this being not mafia is that we don't really have to guess which one, we can just contain both.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 04:41
|
|
|
Suppose that's fair. Also thanks I love you too.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 04:57
|
|
|
Just reposting with deadline. Game status: 8 cards in the policy deck 6 cards in the discard pile 1 Fascist policies passed 2 Liberal policies passed Presidency order: CapitalistPig Dick Bastardly Retro Futurist kumba Anomalous Amalgam TMMadman Byers2142 PMush Perfect CapnAndy King Burgundy Previous administration was King Burgundy and TMMadman. CapitalistPig must nominate a player by May 13th, 23:00 GMT.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 15:16
|
|
|
I would nominate me for chancellor.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 15:57
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Should be me. I kind of have to pick a liberal policy now, even if I was a fascist. lol nice try i think i believe KB especially after this post CapitalistPig posted:I am inclined to say AA or kumba i'm down for that, i dont have a good read on AA so would be nice to have some info right now my Secret Hitler Lumpen List looks like totally liberal: myself, tmm probably liberal: kb, andy neutral: cpig, AA, pmush, DB probably fash: byers totally fash: rf
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 16:43
|
|
|
I'm fine with AA or Kumba.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
kumba posted:lol nice try I'm about to start driving to Milwaukee today so I probably won't be posting much during work hours today, but I'm a little surprised to see that you've listed me as totally liberal. I mean it's right of course, but you may be the lone person in the thread thinking it. I would have expected to see myself in the neutral category. I also disagree about CapnAndy, but that's because I'm a little paranoid. I'd rank him at neutral too. Although thinking about it, I'm not sure I have anyone I think is totally liberal yet. I think the highest I'm willing to go is to mark you as probably liberal.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:02
|
|
|
Also, I forgot that I was term limited earlier, so yeah the chancellor basically has to be one of AA/kumba. I'm still trying to decide which way I think is best.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:09
|
|
|
We have four fascists, right? Including Hitler?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:10
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:We have four fascists, right? Including Hitler? That's right. 3 regular fascists + Secret Hitler
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:That's right. 3 regular fascists + Secret Hitler I'm pretty sure that the remaining two regular fascists are PMush and TMM. PMush is mostly a gut read; I remember that she reacted to or explained something about her Presidency that struck me as immediately suspicious, but I've forgoten exactly what it is. She's done nothing since to allay my suspicions. TMM is a bit more obvious of a case, I think. He's been talking and talking and talking and yet somehow it all always adds up to very little; he advocates bad plans and goes inquisitorial about why people won't immediately fall in line with them and yet doesn't defend the plans all that fiercely when pushed back, and always seems to have two opinions and three possibilities about any one subject. I'll be voting no if either of them is made Chancellor, and also would obviously prefer the next investigation to be one of them.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:32
|
|
|
Hey CapnAndy, what do you think of kumba saying I'm totally liberal?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:42
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:Okay, then no reason to sit on this any longer, because I'm not confident in my Hitler-finding abilities. Cool. So TMM and Pmush are liberal unless you are double bluffing us. Got it.  My strongest fascist reads are the obvious RF and the obvious to me CapnAndy. One thing I'll bring up on Capn, is notice how unwilling he was to name specific names about who to investigate yesterday when I called him out. He just "liked the direction" we were going in, despite it being counter to what he initially wanted.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
my read on TMM is gut based on games we've played together in the pastCapnAndy posted:TMM is a bit more obvious of a case, I think. He's been talking and talking and talking and yet somehow it all always adds up to very little; he advocates bad plans and goes inquisitorial about why people won't immediately fall in line with them and yet doesn't defend the plans all that fiercely when pushed back, and always seems to have two opinions and three possibilities about any one subject. this is TMM as a person, not necessarily TMM as a fascist. his wordiness, convoluted and wandering as it may be, is much more in line with his good guy play imo. i would expect him to be much more reserved if he were fash could be hitler, i guess, but i dont see TMM as a general fash
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 18:06
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Hey CapnAndy, what do you think of kumba saying I'm totally liberal? King Burgundy posted:One thing I'll bring up on Capn, is notice how unwilling he was to name specific names about who to investigate yesterday when I called him out. He just "liked the direction" we were going in, despite it being counter to what he initially wanted.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 18:10
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:He's guessing in good faith and I think he's reading you wrong. It happens! One of us is wrong, but we're both trying. I mean look, if I end up being wrong, I'll apologize after. But I don't think I am. In Social Deduction games, when people avoid making calls on specific people, they are hiding something. Almost everyone else was willing to make a call on someone specific in the near president list who they preferred. You on the other hand, just said you were good with whatever. Yes, changing from must be Pig, to someone else would be compromise. My problem is you didn't call out someone specific you preferred of the other choices. Nothing about this is me representing you. This is what you actually did.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 18:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:43 |
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I mean look, if I end up being wrong, I'll apologize after. But I don't think I am. In Social Deduction games, when people avoid making calls on specific people, they are hiding something. Almost everyone else was willing to make a call on someone specific in the near president list who they preferred. You on the other hand, just said you were good with whatever. Yes, changing from must be Pig, to someone else would be compromise. My problem is you didn't call out someone specific you preferred of the other choices. I'm done repeating myself on this, you can either understand it or not. I have no smaller words to put it in. actual edit: I quoted my own posts and then remembered that wasn't an okay thing to do. CapnAndy fucked around with this message at 18:20 on May 11, 2018 |
|
#
?
May 11, 2018 18:18
|
|